治疗视网膜色素变性的净现值成本分析。

IF 3 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Medical Economics Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-16 DOI:10.1080/13696998.2025.2559533
Sarah Hellems, Sanjit Puri, Salina Yip, Jason Fehr, Dejan Milentijevic
{"title":"治疗视网膜色素变性的净现值成本分析。","authors":"Sarah Hellems, Sanjit Puri, Salina Yip, Jason Fehr, Dejan Milentijevic","doi":"10.1080/13696998.2025.2559533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To provide insights into the financial burden and opportunity cost of vision loss from retinitis pigmentosa (RP) in the US by using net present value (NPV) of direct medical and nonmedical costs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Assumptions, including economic (discount rate, median income, cost-of-living, Social Security and Medicare taxes, public insurance/supplemental benefits, nutrition assistance, and prescription drug assistance), medical (federal National Health Expenditure tables, a recent retrospective claims analysis, and Optum Health claims database) and demographic (mortality rate, increase in mortality due to visual impairment, progression of blindness, probability of survival, retirement rate, rate of disability, and RP diagnosis probability) were made to develop a NPV model. Scenario analyses were performed on benefits and costs arising from patients with RP, if vision could be preserved <i>via</i> novel gene therapies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on modeled assumptions, for a patient with RP treated with gene therapy at age 15, the NPV opportunity cost of not treating was $3,973,909 ($1,027,358 in lost accrual of government benefits throughout employment and $2,946,551 paid by government programs due to visual impairment). For a patient treated at age 35, the NPV opportunity cost of not treating was $2,866,964 ($719,926 in lost accrual of benefits and $2,147,038 paid by government programs). For a patient treated at age 55, the NPV opportunity cost of not treating was $2,091,032 ($758,445 in lost accrual of government benefits and $1,332,587 paid by government programs).</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>As it was not possible to include all potential factors, the model may under- or overestimate true NPV. Potential treatment costs were included as hypothetical estimates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Novel gene therapies for RP likely offset significant government costs toward disability payments; these savings may be even greater when administered during adolescence.</p>","PeriodicalId":16229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Economics","volume":" ","pages":"1591-1601"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Net present value cost analysis for treating retinitis pigmentosa.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Hellems, Sanjit Puri, Salina Yip, Jason Fehr, Dejan Milentijevic\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13696998.2025.2559533\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To provide insights into the financial burden and opportunity cost of vision loss from retinitis pigmentosa (RP) in the US by using net present value (NPV) of direct medical and nonmedical costs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Assumptions, including economic (discount rate, median income, cost-of-living, Social Security and Medicare taxes, public insurance/supplemental benefits, nutrition assistance, and prescription drug assistance), medical (federal National Health Expenditure tables, a recent retrospective claims analysis, and Optum Health claims database) and demographic (mortality rate, increase in mortality due to visual impairment, progression of blindness, probability of survival, retirement rate, rate of disability, and RP diagnosis probability) were made to develop a NPV model. Scenario analyses were performed on benefits and costs arising from patients with RP, if vision could be preserved <i>via</i> novel gene therapies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on modeled assumptions, for a patient with RP treated with gene therapy at age 15, the NPV opportunity cost of not treating was $3,973,909 ($1,027,358 in lost accrual of government benefits throughout employment and $2,946,551 paid by government programs due to visual impairment). For a patient treated at age 35, the NPV opportunity cost of not treating was $2,866,964 ($719,926 in lost accrual of benefits and $2,147,038 paid by government programs). For a patient treated at age 55, the NPV opportunity cost of not treating was $2,091,032 ($758,445 in lost accrual of government benefits and $1,332,587 paid by government programs).</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>As it was not possible to include all potential factors, the model may under- or overestimate true NPV. Potential treatment costs were included as hypothetical estimates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Novel gene therapies for RP likely offset significant government costs toward disability payments; these savings may be even greater when administered during adolescence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Economics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1591-1601\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2025.2559533\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2025.2559533","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:通过使用直接医疗和非医疗费用的净现值(NPV),深入了解美国色素性视网膜炎(RP)视力丧失的经济负担和机会成本。方法:假设,包括经济(贴现率、收入中位数、生活成本、社会保障和医疗保险税、公共保险/补充福利、营养援助和处方药援助)、医疗(联邦国家卫生支出表、最近的回顾性索赔分析和Optum健康索赔数据库)和人口(死亡率、因视力障碍导致的死亡率增加、失明的进展、生存概率、退休率)。残障率、RP诊断概率)建立NPV模型。如果通过新的基因疗法可以保留视力,对RP患者的收益和成本进行了情景分析。结果:基于模型假设,对于15岁时接受基因治疗的RP患者,不治疗的NPV机会成本为3,973,909美元(整个就业期间损失的政府福利为1,027,358美元,由于视力障碍而由政府项目支付的2,946,551美元)。对于35岁时接受治疗的患者,不接受治疗的NPV机会成本为2,866,964美元(719,926美元的应计福利损失和2,147,038美元的政府项目支付)。对于55岁时接受治疗的患者,不接受治疗的NPV机会成本为2,091,032美元(758,445美元为政府福利损失,1,332,587美元为政府项目支付)。局限性:由于不可能包括所有潜在因素,该模型可能会低估或高估真实NPV。潜在的治疗费用作为假设估计包括在内。结论:RP的新型基因疗法可能抵消政府在残疾补贴方面的大量成本;如果在青春期服用,这些节省可能会更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Net present value cost analysis for treating retinitis pigmentosa.

Objectives: To provide insights into the financial burden and opportunity cost of vision loss from retinitis pigmentosa (RP) in the US by using net present value (NPV) of direct medical and nonmedical costs.

Methods: Assumptions, including economic (discount rate, median income, cost-of-living, Social Security and Medicare taxes, public insurance/supplemental benefits, nutrition assistance, and prescription drug assistance), medical (federal National Health Expenditure tables, a recent retrospective claims analysis, and Optum Health claims database) and demographic (mortality rate, increase in mortality due to visual impairment, progression of blindness, probability of survival, retirement rate, rate of disability, and RP diagnosis probability) were made to develop a NPV model. Scenario analyses were performed on benefits and costs arising from patients with RP, if vision could be preserved via novel gene therapies.

Results: Based on modeled assumptions, for a patient with RP treated with gene therapy at age 15, the NPV opportunity cost of not treating was $3,973,909 ($1,027,358 in lost accrual of government benefits throughout employment and $2,946,551 paid by government programs due to visual impairment). For a patient treated at age 35, the NPV opportunity cost of not treating was $2,866,964 ($719,926 in lost accrual of benefits and $2,147,038 paid by government programs). For a patient treated at age 55, the NPV opportunity cost of not treating was $2,091,032 ($758,445 in lost accrual of government benefits and $1,332,587 paid by government programs).

Limitations: As it was not possible to include all potential factors, the model may under- or overestimate true NPV. Potential treatment costs were included as hypothetical estimates.

Conclusions: Novel gene therapies for RP likely offset significant government costs toward disability payments; these savings may be even greater when administered during adolescence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Economics
Journal of Medical Economics HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
122
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Economics'' mission is to provide ethical, unbiased and rapid publication of quality content that is validated by rigorous peer review. The aim of Journal of Medical Economics is to serve the information needs of the pharmacoeconomics and healthcare research community, to help translate research advances into patient care and be a leader in transparency/disclosure by facilitating a collaborative and honest approach to publication. Journal of Medical Economics publishes high-quality economic assessments of novel therapeutic and device interventions for an international audience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信