{"title":"可回收包装对微波处理鸡肉品质的影响:改性气氛PET与PP的比较。","authors":"Sherry Stephanie Chan , Dagbjørn Skipnes , Magnhild Seim Grøvlen , Nusrat Sharmin , Mats Carlehög , Birgitte Moen , Marit Kvalvåg Pettersen , Bjørn Tore Rotabakk","doi":"10.1016/j.jfp.2025.100616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study evaluated the effectiveness of combining recyclable packaging materials in preserving the quality of microwave-treated chicken meat. Specifically, it assessed the combination of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and polypropylene (PP) with modified atmosphere packaging (100% N<sub>2</sub> and 60% CO<sub>2</sub>:40% N<sub>2</sub>). Quality parameters, such as cook loss, color, microbiological stability, and sensory analysis, were monitored over 36 days. Gas composition, oxygen transmission rate (OTR), and thermal properties were also examined. Results indicated that after heat treatment, no statistically significant differences were observed among the packaging materials in terms of cook loss, color, and microbiological shelf-life. However, the PP trays exhibited a higher OTR than PET trays after heat treatment and contact with the chicken. While heat treatment did not affect the thermal properties of either tray, the PP trays showed a shift in crystallization and melting temperature after 28 days of food contact, indicating changes in material properties over time. Sensory analysis revealed lower acceptance scores and more negative sensory attributes for samples in PET trays, possibly due to the suitability and sealing properties of the films for heat treatment. These findings suggest that while microwave treatment effectively extends the microbial shelf life for chicken, the choice of packaging material and gas composition may influence other aspects through storage, such as sensory perception and material integrity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of food protection","volume":"88 11","pages":"Article 100616"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Recyclable Packaging on Microwave-Treated Chicken Quality: A Comparison of PET vs PP with Modified Atmosphere\",\"authors\":\"Sherry Stephanie Chan , Dagbjørn Skipnes , Magnhild Seim Grøvlen , Nusrat Sharmin , Mats Carlehög , Birgitte Moen , Marit Kvalvåg Pettersen , Bjørn Tore Rotabakk\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jfp.2025.100616\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study evaluated the effectiveness of combining recyclable packaging materials in preserving the quality of microwave-treated chicken meat. Specifically, it assessed the combination of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and polypropylene (PP) with modified atmosphere packaging (100% N<sub>2</sub> and 60% CO<sub>2</sub>:40% N<sub>2</sub>). Quality parameters, such as cook loss, color, microbiological stability, and sensory analysis, were monitored over 36 days. Gas composition, oxygen transmission rate (OTR), and thermal properties were also examined. Results indicated that after heat treatment, no statistically significant differences were observed among the packaging materials in terms of cook loss, color, and microbiological shelf-life. However, the PP trays exhibited a higher OTR than PET trays after heat treatment and contact with the chicken. While heat treatment did not affect the thermal properties of either tray, the PP trays showed a shift in crystallization and melting temperature after 28 days of food contact, indicating changes in material properties over time. Sensory analysis revealed lower acceptance scores and more negative sensory attributes for samples in PET trays, possibly due to the suitability and sealing properties of the films for heat treatment. These findings suggest that while microwave treatment effectively extends the microbial shelf life for chicken, the choice of packaging material and gas composition may influence other aspects through storage, such as sensory perception and material integrity.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of food protection\",\"volume\":\"88 11\",\"pages\":\"Article 100616\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of food protection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X25001681\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of food protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X25001681","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impact of Recyclable Packaging on Microwave-Treated Chicken Quality: A Comparison of PET vs PP with Modified Atmosphere
This study evaluated the effectiveness of combining recyclable packaging materials in preserving the quality of microwave-treated chicken meat. Specifically, it assessed the combination of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and polypropylene (PP) with modified atmosphere packaging (100% N2 and 60% CO2:40% N2). Quality parameters, such as cook loss, color, microbiological stability, and sensory analysis, were monitored over 36 days. Gas composition, oxygen transmission rate (OTR), and thermal properties were also examined. Results indicated that after heat treatment, no statistically significant differences were observed among the packaging materials in terms of cook loss, color, and microbiological shelf-life. However, the PP trays exhibited a higher OTR than PET trays after heat treatment and contact with the chicken. While heat treatment did not affect the thermal properties of either tray, the PP trays showed a shift in crystallization and melting temperature after 28 days of food contact, indicating changes in material properties over time. Sensory analysis revealed lower acceptance scores and more negative sensory attributes for samples in PET trays, possibly due to the suitability and sealing properties of the films for heat treatment. These findings suggest that while microwave treatment effectively extends the microbial shelf life for chicken, the choice of packaging material and gas composition may influence other aspects through storage, such as sensory perception and material integrity.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Food Protection® (JFP) is an international, monthly scientific journal in the English language published by the International Association for Food Protection (IAFP). JFP publishes research and review articles on all aspects of food protection and safety. Major emphases of JFP are placed on studies dealing with:
Tracking, detecting (including traditional, molecular, and real-time), inactivating, and controlling food-related hazards, including microorganisms (including antibiotic resistance), microbial (mycotoxins, seafood toxins) and non-microbial toxins (heavy metals, pesticides, veterinary drug residues, migrants from food packaging, and processing contaminants), allergens and pests (insects, rodents) in human food, pet food and animal feed throughout the food chain;
Microbiological food quality and traditional/novel methods to assay microbiological food quality;
Prevention of food-related hazards and food spoilage through food preservatives and thermal/non-thermal processes, including process validation;
Food fermentations and food-related probiotics;
Safe food handling practices during pre-harvest, harvest, post-harvest, distribution and consumption, including food safety education for retailers, foodservice, and consumers;
Risk assessments for food-related hazards;
Economic impact of food-related hazards, foodborne illness, food loss, food spoilage, and adulterated foods;
Food fraud, food authentication, food defense, and foodborne disease outbreak investigations.