风向对猪场附近与未接触牲畜人群感染MRSA CC398风险之间关系的影响:一项丹麦全国人口为基础的研究

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Martin Rune Hassan Hansen, Jörg Schullehner, Steen Gyldenkærne, Øyvind Omland, Lise Marie Frohn, Torben Sigsgaard, Vivi Schlünssen
{"title":"风向对猪场附近与未接触牲畜人群感染MRSA CC398风险之间关系的影响:一项丹麦全国人口为基础的研究","authors":"Martin Rune Hassan Hansen, Jörg Schullehner, Steen Gyldenkærne, Øyvind Omland, Lise Marie Frohn, Torben Sigsgaard, Vivi Schlünssen","doi":"10.1007/s15010-025-02629-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Livestock-MRSA (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus) can cause infections in persons without known contact to livestock, but the route of transmission is unclear. We investigated whether the risk of livestock-MRSA infection among persons with no known contact to livestock is associated with the number of pig farms near the home, and whether this association is affected by the upwind/downwind location of the farms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Register-based case-control study of 518 persons from Denmark with clinical infections with livestock-MRSA in 2016-2021 and no known exposure to livestock, and 4,944 matched controls. Distances and angles from home addresses to all pig farms within a distance of 25 km were calculated, and compared with the mean wind direction in the area.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean number of pig farms within 13,127 m of the home address was 3.3 [0.3; 6.3] higher for cases (60.5) than controls (57.1), with a larger difference for farms upwind than downwind. The primary analysis showed that the livestock-MRSA exposure from a downwind farm was 59% [40%; 178%] of the exposure from an upwind farm, but the difference disappeared after confounder adjustment. In a post-hoc analysis, cases were surrounded by more pig farms at 50 - 6,250 m from the home address, and in the interval 1,250-6,250 m the difference was only seen in the upwind directions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The risk of livestock-MRSA infection among persons without known livestock contact was influenced by the number of and distance to pig farms. In an exploratory post-hoc analysis, but not the main analysis, the risk was also influenced by mean wind direction.</p>","PeriodicalId":13600,"journal":{"name":"Infection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of wind direction on the relationship between proximity to pig farms and risk of infection with MRSA CC398 among persons without known contact to livestock: a Danish nationwide population-based study.\",\"authors\":\"Martin Rune Hassan Hansen, Jörg Schullehner, Steen Gyldenkærne, Øyvind Omland, Lise Marie Frohn, Torben Sigsgaard, Vivi Schlünssen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s15010-025-02629-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Livestock-MRSA (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus) can cause infections in persons without known contact to livestock, but the route of transmission is unclear. We investigated whether the risk of livestock-MRSA infection among persons with no known contact to livestock is associated with the number of pig farms near the home, and whether this association is affected by the upwind/downwind location of the farms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Register-based case-control study of 518 persons from Denmark with clinical infections with livestock-MRSA in 2016-2021 and no known exposure to livestock, and 4,944 matched controls. Distances and angles from home addresses to all pig farms within a distance of 25 km were calculated, and compared with the mean wind direction in the area.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean number of pig farms within 13,127 m of the home address was 3.3 [0.3; 6.3] higher for cases (60.5) than controls (57.1), with a larger difference for farms upwind than downwind. The primary analysis showed that the livestock-MRSA exposure from a downwind farm was 59% [40%; 178%] of the exposure from an upwind farm, but the difference disappeared after confounder adjustment. In a post-hoc analysis, cases were surrounded by more pig farms at 50 - 6,250 m from the home address, and in the interval 1,250-6,250 m the difference was only seen in the upwind directions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The risk of livestock-MRSA infection among persons without known livestock contact was influenced by the number of and distance to pig farms. In an exploratory post-hoc analysis, but not the main analysis, the risk was also influenced by mean wind direction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13600,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infection\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-025-02629-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-025-02629-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:家畜- mrsa(耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌)可在未与家畜接触的人群中引起感染,但其传播途径尚不清楚。我们调查了没有接触过牲畜的人感染牲畜- mrsa的风险是否与家庭附近养猪场的数量有关,以及这种关联是否受到养猪场顺风/顺风位置的影响。方法:基于登记的病例对照研究,2016-2021年丹麦518例家畜- mrsa临床感染患者和4,944例匹配对照。计算了家庭住址到25公里范围内所有养猪场的距离和角度,并与该地区的平均风向进行了比较。结果:家庭住址13127 m范围内的养猪场平均数量为3.3个[0.3个;6.3]病例(60.5)高于对照组(57.1),逆风农场比顺风农场差异更大。初步分析表明,来自顺风农场的牲畜- mrsa暴露率为59% [40%;(178%),但混杂校正后差异消失。在事后分析中,病例被更多的养猪场包围,距离家庭住址50- 6250米,在1250 - 6250米的区间内,差异只在逆风方向上可见。结论:未接触过家畜的人群感染mrsa的风险受猪场数量和距离的影响。在一项探索性的事后分析(但不是主要分析)中,风险也受到平均风向的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Influence of wind direction on the relationship between proximity to pig farms and risk of infection with MRSA CC398 among persons without known contact to livestock: a Danish nationwide population-based study.

Background: Livestock-MRSA (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus) can cause infections in persons without known contact to livestock, but the route of transmission is unclear. We investigated whether the risk of livestock-MRSA infection among persons with no known contact to livestock is associated with the number of pig farms near the home, and whether this association is affected by the upwind/downwind location of the farms.

Methods: Register-based case-control study of 518 persons from Denmark with clinical infections with livestock-MRSA in 2016-2021 and no known exposure to livestock, and 4,944 matched controls. Distances and angles from home addresses to all pig farms within a distance of 25 km were calculated, and compared with the mean wind direction in the area.

Results: The mean number of pig farms within 13,127 m of the home address was 3.3 [0.3; 6.3] higher for cases (60.5) than controls (57.1), with a larger difference for farms upwind than downwind. The primary analysis showed that the livestock-MRSA exposure from a downwind farm was 59% [40%; 178%] of the exposure from an upwind farm, but the difference disappeared after confounder adjustment. In a post-hoc analysis, cases were surrounded by more pig farms at 50 - 6,250 m from the home address, and in the interval 1,250-6,250 m the difference was only seen in the upwind directions.

Conclusion: The risk of livestock-MRSA infection among persons without known livestock contact was influenced by the number of and distance to pig farms. In an exploratory post-hoc analysis, but not the main analysis, the risk was also influenced by mean wind direction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Infection
Infection 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
1.30%
发文量
224
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Infection is a journal dedicated to serving as a global forum for the presentation and discussion of clinically relevant information on infectious diseases. Its primary goal is to engage readers and contributors from various regions around the world in the exchange of knowledge about the etiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of infectious diseases, both in outpatient and inpatient settings. The journal covers a wide range of topics, including: Etiology: The study of the causes of infectious diseases. Pathogenesis: The process by which an infectious agent causes disease. Diagnosis: The methods and techniques used to identify infectious diseases. Treatment: The medical interventions and strategies employed to treat infectious diseases. Public Health: Issues of local, regional, or international significance related to infectious diseases, including prevention, control, and management strategies. Hospital Epidemiology: The study of the spread of infectious diseases within healthcare settings and the measures to prevent nosocomial infections. In addition to these, Infection also includes a specialized "Images" section, which focuses on high-quality visual content, such as images, photographs, and microscopic slides, accompanied by brief abstracts. This section is designed to highlight the clinical and diagnostic value of visual aids in the field of infectious diseases, as many conditions present with characteristic clinical signs that can be diagnosed through inspection, and imaging and microscopy are crucial for accurate diagnosis. The journal's comprehensive approach ensures that it remains a valuable resource for healthcare professionals and researchers in the field of infectious diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信