七氟醚或雷马唑仑麻醉和成人鼻手术后出现的躁动:一项随机临床试验。

IF 6.8 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Heeyoon Jang, Jun-Young Jo, Jung-Pil Yoon, Wook-Jong Kim, Seungwoo Ku, Seong-Soo Choi
{"title":"七氟醚或雷马唑仑麻醉和成人鼻手术后出现的躁动:一项随机临床试验。","authors":"Heeyoon Jang, Jun-Young Jo, Jung-Pil Yoon, Wook-Jong Kim, Seungwoo Ku, Seong-Soo Choi","doi":"10.1097/EJA.0000000000002267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emergence agitation is common after nasal surgery under general anaesthesia. Remimazolam, a novel ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine, allows haemodynamic stability and prompt postoperative recovery, but the specific impact of remimazolam on emergence agitation is not well understood.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The primary aim of this study was to compare the effects of remimazolam-based total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) and sevoflurane-based volatile induction and maintenance of anaesthesia (VIMA) on the occurrence of emergence agitation.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A prospective, randomised, assessor-blinded clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A single-centre study in a university-affiliated tertiary hospital.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Ninety-eight adults undergoing nasal surgery under general anaesthesia.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Patients were randomised into two groups. The Sevoflurane group (n = 49) received VIMA with sevoflurane and nitrous oxide, while the Remimazolam group (n = 49) received TIVA with remimazolam and remifentanil.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The primary outcome was the occurrence of emergence agitation, which was evaluated using the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale and the Riker Sedation-Agitation Scale. The secondary outcomes were immediate complications after extubation and postoperative pain, and the interval between discontinuation of anaesthesia and extubation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Emergence agitation, as measured by the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale, occurred in six of 49 patients (12.2%) in the Sevoflurane group and none (0.0%) in the Remimazolam group. The risk difference was 12.2 (95% CI, 3.0 to 21.4, P = 0.008). The occurrence measured by the Riker Sedation-Agitation Scale was identical to that with the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale. Coughing was more frequent in the Sevoflurane group, 53.1 vs. 12.2%, risk difference = 40.8 (95% CI, 24.0 to 57.5, P < 0.001). In addition, the interval between discontinuation of anaesthesia and extubation was lower in the Remimazolam group than the Sevoflurane group (9.00 ± 4.25 min vs. 12.18 ± 4.18 min, respectively, P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The occurrence of emergence agitation in adult patients after nasal surgery under general anaesthesia can be significantly reduced using remimazolam-based TIVA.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinical Research Information Service (KCT0007387).</p>","PeriodicalId":11920,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Anaesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sevoflurane or remimazolam anaesthesia and emergence agitation after nasal surgery in adults: A randomised clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Heeyoon Jang, Jun-Young Jo, Jung-Pil Yoon, Wook-Jong Kim, Seungwoo Ku, Seong-Soo Choi\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/EJA.0000000000002267\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emergence agitation is common after nasal surgery under general anaesthesia. Remimazolam, a novel ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine, allows haemodynamic stability and prompt postoperative recovery, but the specific impact of remimazolam on emergence agitation is not well understood.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The primary aim of this study was to compare the effects of remimazolam-based total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) and sevoflurane-based volatile induction and maintenance of anaesthesia (VIMA) on the occurrence of emergence agitation.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A prospective, randomised, assessor-blinded clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A single-centre study in a university-affiliated tertiary hospital.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Ninety-eight adults undergoing nasal surgery under general anaesthesia.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Patients were randomised into two groups. The Sevoflurane group (n = 49) received VIMA with sevoflurane and nitrous oxide, while the Remimazolam group (n = 49) received TIVA with remimazolam and remifentanil.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The primary outcome was the occurrence of emergence agitation, which was evaluated using the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale and the Riker Sedation-Agitation Scale. The secondary outcomes were immediate complications after extubation and postoperative pain, and the interval between discontinuation of anaesthesia and extubation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Emergence agitation, as measured by the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale, occurred in six of 49 patients (12.2%) in the Sevoflurane group and none (0.0%) in the Remimazolam group. The risk difference was 12.2 (95% CI, 3.0 to 21.4, P = 0.008). The occurrence measured by the Riker Sedation-Agitation Scale was identical to that with the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale. Coughing was more frequent in the Sevoflurane group, 53.1 vs. 12.2%, risk difference = 40.8 (95% CI, 24.0 to 57.5, P < 0.001). In addition, the interval between discontinuation of anaesthesia and extubation was lower in the Remimazolam group than the Sevoflurane group (9.00 ± 4.25 min vs. 12.18 ± 4.18 min, respectively, P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The occurrence of emergence agitation in adult patients after nasal surgery under general anaesthesia can be significantly reduced using remimazolam-based TIVA.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinical Research Information Service (KCT0007387).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11920,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Anaesthesiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Anaesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000002267\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Anaesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000002267","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:全麻鼻手术后出现性躁动是常见的。雷马唑仑是一种新型的超短效苯二氮卓类药物,可使血流动力学稳定并迅速术后恢复,但雷马唑仑对突发性躁动的具体影响尚不清楚。目的:本研究的主要目的是比较以雷马唑仑为基础的全静脉麻醉(TIVA)和以七氟醚为基础的挥发性诱导和维持麻醉(VIMA)对出现性躁动发生的影响。设计:前瞻性、随机、评估盲法临床试验。环境:大学附属三级医院的单中心研究。参与者:98名在全身麻醉下接受鼻腔手术的成年人。干预措施:患者随机分为两组。七氟醚组(n = 49)采用七氟醚+氧化亚氮的VIMA,雷马唑仑组(n = 49)采用雷马唑仑+瑞芬太尼的TIVA。主要观察指标:主要观察指标为突发性躁动的发生情况,采用Richmond躁动-镇静量表和Riker镇静-躁动量表进行评估。次要结果为拔管后即刻并发症和术后疼痛,以及麻醉停止和拔管之间的时间间隔。结果:根据Richmond躁动-镇静量表测量,七氟醚组49例患者中有6例(12.2%)出现突发性躁动,雷马唑仑组无一例(0.0%)。风险差异为12.2 (95% CI, 3.0 ~ 21.4, P = 0.008)。Riker镇静-躁动量表测量的发生率与Richmond躁动-镇静量表相同。七氟醚组咳嗽更频繁,53.1 vs. 12.2%,风险差异= 40.8 (95% CI, 24.0 ~ 57.5, P)结论:雷马唑仑为基础的TIVA可显著降低全麻鼻手术后成人患者突发性激越的发生。试验注册:临床研究信息中心(KCT0007387)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sevoflurane or remimazolam anaesthesia and emergence agitation after nasal surgery in adults: A randomised clinical trial.

Background: Emergence agitation is common after nasal surgery under general anaesthesia. Remimazolam, a novel ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine, allows haemodynamic stability and prompt postoperative recovery, but the specific impact of remimazolam on emergence agitation is not well understood.

Objectives: The primary aim of this study was to compare the effects of remimazolam-based total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) and sevoflurane-based volatile induction and maintenance of anaesthesia (VIMA) on the occurrence of emergence agitation.

Design: A prospective, randomised, assessor-blinded clinical trial.

Setting: A single-centre study in a university-affiliated tertiary hospital.

Participants: Ninety-eight adults undergoing nasal surgery under general anaesthesia.

Interventions: Patients were randomised into two groups. The Sevoflurane group (n = 49) received VIMA with sevoflurane and nitrous oxide, while the Remimazolam group (n = 49) received TIVA with remimazolam and remifentanil.

Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was the occurrence of emergence agitation, which was evaluated using the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale and the Riker Sedation-Agitation Scale. The secondary outcomes were immediate complications after extubation and postoperative pain, and the interval between discontinuation of anaesthesia and extubation.

Results: Emergence agitation, as measured by the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale, occurred in six of 49 patients (12.2%) in the Sevoflurane group and none (0.0%) in the Remimazolam group. The risk difference was 12.2 (95% CI, 3.0 to 21.4, P = 0.008). The occurrence measured by the Riker Sedation-Agitation Scale was identical to that with the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale. Coughing was more frequent in the Sevoflurane group, 53.1 vs. 12.2%, risk difference = 40.8 (95% CI, 24.0 to 57.5, P < 0.001). In addition, the interval between discontinuation of anaesthesia and extubation was lower in the Remimazolam group than the Sevoflurane group (9.00 ± 4.25 min vs. 12.18 ± 4.18 min, respectively, P < 0.001).

Conclusion: The occurrence of emergence agitation in adult patients after nasal surgery under general anaesthesia can be significantly reduced using remimazolam-based TIVA.

Trial registration: Clinical Research Information Service (KCT0007387).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
351
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Anaesthesiology (EJA) publishes original work of high scientific quality in the field of anaesthesiology, pain, emergency medicine and intensive care. Preference is given to experimental work or clinical observation in man, and to laboratory work of clinical relevance. The journal also publishes commissioned reviews by an authority, editorials, invited commentaries, special articles, pro and con debates, and short reports (correspondences, case reports, short reports of clinical studies).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信