新辅助免疫化疗对局部晚期食管癌术后肺部并发症的影响:倾向评分匹配队列研究。

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL
Drug Design, Development and Therapy Pub Date : 2025-09-03 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/DDDT.S537794
Wei Du, Xi Qiao, Jifang Yao, Zhijiao Wang, Yuanyuan Shi, Huiqun Jia
{"title":"新辅助免疫化疗对局部晚期食管癌术后肺部并发症的影响:倾向评分匹配队列研究。","authors":"Wei Du, Xi Qiao, Jifang Yao, Zhijiao Wang, Yuanyuan Shi, Huiqun Jia","doi":"10.2147/DDDT.S537794","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NICT) has shown promise in improving the oncological outcomes of locally advanced esophageal cancer (LAEC). However, concerns remain regarding its potential to induce pulmonary side effects that may increase the risk of perioperative adverse events. This study aimed to compare the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) in patients receiving NICT and those undergoing non-neoadjuvant therapy.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included 274 patients with LAEC who received either NICT or non-neoadjuvant therapy followed by radical esophagectomy. Propensity score matching was used to balance patient characteristics between the two groups. The primary outcome was the incidence of PPCs within the first seven days postoperatively. Conditional logistic regression models were used to assess the association between NICT and PPCs. Sensitivity analysis using inverse probability of treatment weighting was conducted to validate the robustness of the findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 182 patients were included in the final analysis, with 91 patients in each group. The incidence of PPCs was significantly higher in the NICT group than in the control group (46.2% vs 26.4%, <i>P</i> = 0.009). Respiratory infections (37.4% vs 22.0%, <i>P</i> = 0.035) and pleural effusions (22.0% vs 9.9%, <i>P</i> = 0.043) were more frequent in the NICT group. New-onset arrhythmia was the most common cardiovascular complication, with tachycardia occurring in 24.2% of patients in the NICT group compared to 9.9% in the control group (<i>P</i> = 0.018). Conditional logistic regression analysis revealed a significant association between NICT and PPCs (OR = 5.648, 95% CI: 1.579-20.204, <i>P</i> = 0.008). Sensitivity analysis using IPTW further confirmed these results (OR = 2.893, 95% CI = 1.537-5.446, <i>P</i> = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer who received at least two cycles of NICT had a significantly increased risk of developing postoperative pulmonary complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":11290,"journal":{"name":"Drug Design, Development and Therapy","volume":"19 ","pages":"7637-7651"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12414448/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Neoadjuvant Immunochemotherapy on Postoperative Pulmonary Complications for Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Wei Du, Xi Qiao, Jifang Yao, Zhijiao Wang, Yuanyuan Shi, Huiqun Jia\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/DDDT.S537794\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NICT) has shown promise in improving the oncological outcomes of locally advanced esophageal cancer (LAEC). However, concerns remain regarding its potential to induce pulmonary side effects that may increase the risk of perioperative adverse events. This study aimed to compare the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) in patients receiving NICT and those undergoing non-neoadjuvant therapy.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included 274 patients with LAEC who received either NICT or non-neoadjuvant therapy followed by radical esophagectomy. Propensity score matching was used to balance patient characteristics between the two groups. The primary outcome was the incidence of PPCs within the first seven days postoperatively. Conditional logistic regression models were used to assess the association between NICT and PPCs. Sensitivity analysis using inverse probability of treatment weighting was conducted to validate the robustness of the findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 182 patients were included in the final analysis, with 91 patients in each group. The incidence of PPCs was significantly higher in the NICT group than in the control group (46.2% vs 26.4%, <i>P</i> = 0.009). Respiratory infections (37.4% vs 22.0%, <i>P</i> = 0.035) and pleural effusions (22.0% vs 9.9%, <i>P</i> = 0.043) were more frequent in the NICT group. New-onset arrhythmia was the most common cardiovascular complication, with tachycardia occurring in 24.2% of patients in the NICT group compared to 9.9% in the control group (<i>P</i> = 0.018). Conditional logistic regression analysis revealed a significant association between NICT and PPCs (OR = 5.648, 95% CI: 1.579-20.204, <i>P</i> = 0.008). Sensitivity analysis using IPTW further confirmed these results (OR = 2.893, 95% CI = 1.537-5.446, <i>P</i> = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer who received at least two cycles of NICT had a significantly increased risk of developing postoperative pulmonary complications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11290,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drug Design, Development and Therapy\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"7637-7651\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12414448/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drug Design, Development and Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S537794\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Design, Development and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S537794","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:新辅助免疫化疗(NICT)有望改善局部晚期食管癌(LAEC)的肿瘤预后。然而,人们仍然担心其可能诱发肺部副作用,从而增加围手术期不良事件的风险。本研究旨在比较NICT患者和非新辅助治疗患者术后肺部并发症(PPCs)的发生率。患者和方法:这项回顾性队列研究包括274例LAEC患者,他们接受NICT或非新辅助治疗,然后进行根治性食管切除术。倾向评分匹配用于平衡两组患者的特征。主要观察指标是术后7天内PPCs的发生率。使用条件逻辑回归模型评估NICT与PPCs之间的关系。采用处理加权逆概率进行敏感性分析,以验证研究结果的稳健性。结果:最终纳入182例患者,每组91例。NICT组PPCs发生率明显高于对照组(46.2% vs 26.4%, P = 0.009)。NICT组呼吸道感染(37.4% vs 22.0%, P = 0.035)和胸腔积液(22.0% vs 9.9%, P = 0.043)发生率更高。新发心律失常是最常见的心血管并发症,NICT组患者的心动过速发生率为24.2%,而对照组为9.9% (P = 0.018)。条件logistic回归分析显示NICT与PPCs之间存在显著相关性(OR = 5.648, 95% CI: 1.579-20.204, P = 0.008)。使用IPTW进行敏感性分析进一步证实了这些结果(OR = 2.893, 95% CI = 1.537-5.446, P = 0.001)。结论:局部晚期食管癌患者接受至少两个周期的NICT治疗后发生术后肺部并发症的风险显著增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Effect of Neoadjuvant Immunochemotherapy on Postoperative Pulmonary Complications for Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Cohort Study.

Effect of Neoadjuvant Immunochemotherapy on Postoperative Pulmonary Complications for Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Cohort Study.

Effect of Neoadjuvant Immunochemotherapy on Postoperative Pulmonary Complications for Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Cohort Study.

Effect of Neoadjuvant Immunochemotherapy on Postoperative Pulmonary Complications for Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Cohort Study.

Purpose: Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NICT) has shown promise in improving the oncological outcomes of locally advanced esophageal cancer (LAEC). However, concerns remain regarding its potential to induce pulmonary side effects that may increase the risk of perioperative adverse events. This study aimed to compare the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) in patients receiving NICT and those undergoing non-neoadjuvant therapy.

Patients and methods: This retrospective cohort study included 274 patients with LAEC who received either NICT or non-neoadjuvant therapy followed by radical esophagectomy. Propensity score matching was used to balance patient characteristics between the two groups. The primary outcome was the incidence of PPCs within the first seven days postoperatively. Conditional logistic regression models were used to assess the association between NICT and PPCs. Sensitivity analysis using inverse probability of treatment weighting was conducted to validate the robustness of the findings.

Results: A total of 182 patients were included in the final analysis, with 91 patients in each group. The incidence of PPCs was significantly higher in the NICT group than in the control group (46.2% vs 26.4%, P = 0.009). Respiratory infections (37.4% vs 22.0%, P = 0.035) and pleural effusions (22.0% vs 9.9%, P = 0.043) were more frequent in the NICT group. New-onset arrhythmia was the most common cardiovascular complication, with tachycardia occurring in 24.2% of patients in the NICT group compared to 9.9% in the control group (P = 0.018). Conditional logistic regression analysis revealed a significant association between NICT and PPCs (OR = 5.648, 95% CI: 1.579-20.204, P = 0.008). Sensitivity analysis using IPTW further confirmed these results (OR = 2.893, 95% CI = 1.537-5.446, P = 0.001).

Conclusion: Patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer who received at least two cycles of NICT had a significantly increased risk of developing postoperative pulmonary complications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Drug Design, Development and Therapy
Drug Design, Development and Therapy CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
382
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Drug Design, Development and Therapy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that spans the spectrum of drug design, discovery and development through to clinical applications. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of high-quality original research, reviews, expert opinions, commentary and clinical studies in all therapeutic areas. Specific topics covered by the journal include: Drug target identification and validation Phenotypic screening and target deconvolution Biochemical analyses of drug targets and their pathways New methods or relevant applications in molecular/drug design and computer-aided drug discovery* Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of novel biologically active compounds (including diagnostics or chemical probes) Structural or molecular biological studies elucidating molecular recognition processes Fragment-based drug discovery Pharmaceutical/red biotechnology Isolation, structural characterization, (bio)synthesis, bioengineering and pharmacological evaluation of natural products** Distribution, pharmacokinetics and metabolic transformations of drugs or biologically active compounds in drug development Drug delivery and formulation (design and characterization of dosage forms, release mechanisms and in vivo testing) Preclinical development studies Translational animal models Mechanisms of action and signalling pathways Toxicology Gene therapy, cell therapy and immunotherapy Personalized medicine and pharmacogenomics Clinical drug evaluation Patient safety and sustained use of medicines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信