来自欧洲基线系列的皮炎患者对橡胶促进剂接触性过敏的患病率:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 4.6 1区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY
Daniel Isufi, Christoffer Kursawe Larsen, Mikkel Bak Jensen, Kian Karimian, Claus Zachariae, Jakob Ferløv Baselius Schwensen, Farzad Alinaghi, Jeanne Duus Johansen
{"title":"来自欧洲基线系列的皮炎患者对橡胶促进剂接触性过敏的患病率:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Daniel Isufi, Christoffer Kursawe Larsen, Mikkel Bak Jensen, Kian Karimian, Claus Zachariae, Jakob Ferløv Baselius Schwensen, Farzad Alinaghi, Jeanne Duus Johansen","doi":"10.1111/cod.70024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rubber accelerators are chemicals used as vulcanizers in the production of rubber items and may cause contact allergy (CA). The aim of this study was to assess the worldwide prevalence of CA to rubber accelerators from the European baseline series among dermatitis patients. A comprehensive literature search across PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science yielded 106 studies with 826 543 individuals patch tested between 1984 and 2023. Meta-analysis showed pooled prevalence rates of 2.55% for thiuram mix, 0.86% for mercapto mix, and 0.83% for mercaptobenzothiazole. Marked geographical variations were observed: North America and Asian regions showed the highest prevalences whereas Europe had lower rates. Comparisons before and after the year 2000 revealed a decline in CA to all three accelerators. Sub-analysis of the extended rubber series revealed the prevalence of CA to tetraethylthiuram disulphide of 3.73% and to zinc diethyldithiocarbamate of 0.60%. The prevalence of CA to carba mix was 3.96%. These findings underscore the public health implications of rubber accelerator-induced CA. Strengthened preventive measures and regulatory efforts, including improved labelling, safe limits of rubber gloves, and reduced use of high-risk accelerators are needed to mitigate disease burden. The results emphasise a need for ongoing surveillance, especially concerning extended rubber series.</p>","PeriodicalId":10527,"journal":{"name":"Contact Dermatitis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence of Contact Allergy to Rubber Accelerators From the European Baseline Series in Dermatitis Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Isufi, Christoffer Kursawe Larsen, Mikkel Bak Jensen, Kian Karimian, Claus Zachariae, Jakob Ferløv Baselius Schwensen, Farzad Alinaghi, Jeanne Duus Johansen\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cod.70024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Rubber accelerators are chemicals used as vulcanizers in the production of rubber items and may cause contact allergy (CA). The aim of this study was to assess the worldwide prevalence of CA to rubber accelerators from the European baseline series among dermatitis patients. A comprehensive literature search across PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science yielded 106 studies with 826 543 individuals patch tested between 1984 and 2023. Meta-analysis showed pooled prevalence rates of 2.55% for thiuram mix, 0.86% for mercapto mix, and 0.83% for mercaptobenzothiazole. Marked geographical variations were observed: North America and Asian regions showed the highest prevalences whereas Europe had lower rates. Comparisons before and after the year 2000 revealed a decline in CA to all three accelerators. Sub-analysis of the extended rubber series revealed the prevalence of CA to tetraethylthiuram disulphide of 3.73% and to zinc diethyldithiocarbamate of 0.60%. The prevalence of CA to carba mix was 3.96%. These findings underscore the public health implications of rubber accelerator-induced CA. Strengthened preventive measures and regulatory efforts, including improved labelling, safe limits of rubber gloves, and reduced use of high-risk accelerators are needed to mitigate disease burden. The results emphasise a need for ongoing surveillance, especially concerning extended rubber series.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10527,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contact Dermatitis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contact Dermatitis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.70024\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contact Dermatitis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.70024","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

橡胶促进剂是橡胶制品生产中用作硫化剂的化学品,可能引起接触性过敏(CA)。本研究的目的是评估来自欧洲基线系列的皮炎患者中橡胶加速剂CA的全球患病率。对PubMed、Embase和Web of Science的综合文献检索得出了106项研究,在1984年至2023年期间对826543名个体进行了贴片测试。荟萃分析显示,硫脲混合物的总患病率为2.55%,硫醇混合物为0.86%,硫醇苯并噻唑为0.83%。观察到明显的地理差异:北美和亚洲地区的患病率最高,而欧洲的患病率较低。2000年前后的比较显示,对所有三个加速因素的CA都有所下降。扩展橡胶系列的亚分析显示,CA对二硫化四乙基硫脲的患病率为3.73%,对二乙基二硫代氨基甲酸锌的患病率为0.60%。CA对碳水化合物混合物的患病率为3.96%。这些发现强调了橡胶促进剂诱发的CA对公共卫生的影响。需要加强预防措施和监管工作,包括改进标签、橡胶手套的安全限制和减少使用高风险促进剂,以减轻疾病负担。结果强调需要持续监测,特别是对延长的橡胶系列。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prevalence of Contact Allergy to Rubber Accelerators From the European Baseline Series in Dermatitis Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Rubber accelerators are chemicals used as vulcanizers in the production of rubber items and may cause contact allergy (CA). The aim of this study was to assess the worldwide prevalence of CA to rubber accelerators from the European baseline series among dermatitis patients. A comprehensive literature search across PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science yielded 106 studies with 826 543 individuals patch tested between 1984 and 2023. Meta-analysis showed pooled prevalence rates of 2.55% for thiuram mix, 0.86% for mercapto mix, and 0.83% for mercaptobenzothiazole. Marked geographical variations were observed: North America and Asian regions showed the highest prevalences whereas Europe had lower rates. Comparisons before and after the year 2000 revealed a decline in CA to all three accelerators. Sub-analysis of the extended rubber series revealed the prevalence of CA to tetraethylthiuram disulphide of 3.73% and to zinc diethyldithiocarbamate of 0.60%. The prevalence of CA to carba mix was 3.96%. These findings underscore the public health implications of rubber accelerator-induced CA. Strengthened preventive measures and regulatory efforts, including improved labelling, safe limits of rubber gloves, and reduced use of high-risk accelerators are needed to mitigate disease burden. The results emphasise a need for ongoing surveillance, especially concerning extended rubber series.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Contact Dermatitis
Contact Dermatitis 医学-过敏
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
30.90%
发文量
227
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Contact Dermatitis is designed primarily as a journal for clinicians who are interested in various aspects of environmental dermatitis. This includes both allergic and irritant (toxic) types of contact dermatitis, occupational (industrial) dermatitis and consumers" dermatitis from such products as cosmetics and toiletries. The journal aims at promoting and maintaining communication among dermatologists, industrial physicians, allergists and clinical immunologists, as well as chemists and research workers involved in industry and the production of consumer goods. Papers are invited on clinical observations, diagnosis and methods of investigation of patients, therapeutic measures, organisation and legislation relating to the control of occupational and consumers".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信