Kit Gallagher, Maximilian A R Strobl, Alexander R A Anderson, Philip K Maini
{"title":"适应性治疗的最佳治疗时机:将模型与肿瘤动力学相匹配。","authors":"Kit Gallagher, Maximilian A R Strobl, Alexander R A Anderson, Philip K Maini","doi":"10.1007/s11538-025-01525-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Adaptive therapy (AT) protocols have been introduced to combat drug resistance in cancer, and are characterized by breaks from maximum tolerated dose treatment (the current standard of care in most clinical settings). These breaks are scheduled to maintain tolerably high levels of tumor burden, employing competitive suppression of treatment-resistant sub-populations by treatment-sensitive sub-populations. AT has been integrated into several ongoing or planned clinical trials, including treatment of metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer, ovarian cancer, and BRAF-mutant melanoma, with initial clinical results suggesting that it can offer significant extensions in the time to progression over the standard of care. Prior AT protocols apply drug treatment when the tumor is within a specific size window, typically determined by the initial tumor size. However, this approach may be sub-optimal as it does not account for variation in tumor dynamics between patients, resulting in significant heterogeneity in patient outcomes. Mathematical modeling and analysis have been proposed to optimize adaptive protocols, but they do not account for clinical restrictions, most notably the discrete time intervals between the clinical appointments where a patient's tumor burden is measured and their treatment schedule is re-evaluated. We present a general framework for deriving optimal treatment protocols that account for these discrete time intervals, and derive optimal schedules for several models to avoid model-specific personalization. We identify a trade-off between the frequency of patient monitoring and the time to progression attainable, and propose an AT protocol that determines drug dosing based on a patient-specific threshold for tumor size. Finally, we identify a subset of patients with qualitatively different dynamics that instead require a novel AT protocol based on a threshold that changes over the course of treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":9372,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Mathematical Biology","volume":"87 10","pages":"146"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12417256/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deriving Optimal Treatment Timing for Adaptive Therapy: Matching the Model to the Tumor Dynamics.\",\"authors\":\"Kit Gallagher, Maximilian A R Strobl, Alexander R A Anderson, Philip K Maini\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11538-025-01525-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Adaptive therapy (AT) protocols have been introduced to combat drug resistance in cancer, and are characterized by breaks from maximum tolerated dose treatment (the current standard of care in most clinical settings). These breaks are scheduled to maintain tolerably high levels of tumor burden, employing competitive suppression of treatment-resistant sub-populations by treatment-sensitive sub-populations. AT has been integrated into several ongoing or planned clinical trials, including treatment of metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer, ovarian cancer, and BRAF-mutant melanoma, with initial clinical results suggesting that it can offer significant extensions in the time to progression over the standard of care. Prior AT protocols apply drug treatment when the tumor is within a specific size window, typically determined by the initial tumor size. However, this approach may be sub-optimal as it does not account for variation in tumor dynamics between patients, resulting in significant heterogeneity in patient outcomes. Mathematical modeling and analysis have been proposed to optimize adaptive protocols, but they do not account for clinical restrictions, most notably the discrete time intervals between the clinical appointments where a patient's tumor burden is measured and their treatment schedule is re-evaluated. We present a general framework for deriving optimal treatment protocols that account for these discrete time intervals, and derive optimal schedules for several models to avoid model-specific personalization. We identify a trade-off between the frequency of patient monitoring and the time to progression attainable, and propose an AT protocol that determines drug dosing based on a patient-specific threshold for tumor size. Finally, we identify a subset of patients with qualitatively different dynamics that instead require a novel AT protocol based on a threshold that changes over the course of treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9372,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of Mathematical Biology\",\"volume\":\"87 10\",\"pages\":\"146\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12417256/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of Mathematical Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-025-01525-y\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Mathematical Biology","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-025-01525-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Deriving Optimal Treatment Timing for Adaptive Therapy: Matching the Model to the Tumor Dynamics.
Adaptive therapy (AT) protocols have been introduced to combat drug resistance in cancer, and are characterized by breaks from maximum tolerated dose treatment (the current standard of care in most clinical settings). These breaks are scheduled to maintain tolerably high levels of tumor burden, employing competitive suppression of treatment-resistant sub-populations by treatment-sensitive sub-populations. AT has been integrated into several ongoing or planned clinical trials, including treatment of metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer, ovarian cancer, and BRAF-mutant melanoma, with initial clinical results suggesting that it can offer significant extensions in the time to progression over the standard of care. Prior AT protocols apply drug treatment when the tumor is within a specific size window, typically determined by the initial tumor size. However, this approach may be sub-optimal as it does not account for variation in tumor dynamics between patients, resulting in significant heterogeneity in patient outcomes. Mathematical modeling and analysis have been proposed to optimize adaptive protocols, but they do not account for clinical restrictions, most notably the discrete time intervals between the clinical appointments where a patient's tumor burden is measured and their treatment schedule is re-evaluated. We present a general framework for deriving optimal treatment protocols that account for these discrete time intervals, and derive optimal schedules for several models to avoid model-specific personalization. We identify a trade-off between the frequency of patient monitoring and the time to progression attainable, and propose an AT protocol that determines drug dosing based on a patient-specific threshold for tumor size. Finally, we identify a subset of patients with qualitatively different dynamics that instead require a novel AT protocol based on a threshold that changes over the course of treatment.
期刊介绍:
The Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, the official journal of the Society for Mathematical Biology, disseminates original research findings and other information relevant to the interface of biology and the mathematical sciences. Contributions should have relevance to both fields. In order to accommodate the broad scope of new developments, the journal accepts a variety of contributions, including:
Original research articles focused on new biological insights gained with the help of tools from the mathematical sciences or new mathematical tools and methods with demonstrated applicability to biological investigations
Research in mathematical biology education
Reviews
Commentaries
Perspectives, and contributions that discuss issues important to the profession
All contributions are peer-reviewed.