妊娠晚期超声扫描的有效性和时机:指南和基础证据的回顾。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Doaa Emam, Giulia Corbella, Caterina Poziello, Simona Fabozzo, Antonio Farina, Massimo Candiani, Karl Oliver Kagan, Paolo Ivo Cavoretto
{"title":"妊娠晚期超声扫描的有效性和时机:指南和基础证据的回顾。","authors":"Doaa Emam, Giulia Corbella, Caterina Poziello, Simona Fabozzo, Antonio Farina, Massimo Candiani, Karl Oliver Kagan, Paolo Ivo Cavoretto","doi":"10.1007/s00404-025-08172-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Recommendations regarding the use of third-trimester ultrasound lack universal consensus. Yet, there is evidence which supports its value in assessing fetal growth, fetal well-being, and a number of pregnancy-related complications. This literature review evaluates the available scientific evidence regarding its applications, usefulness, and the timing of the third-trimester scan in a low-risk population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search (PubMed, Embase, Scopus; until April 1st, 2025) identified English-language studies dealing with third-trimester ultrasound screening, its aims, and its best timing. International and national guidelines were reviewed to assess the current recommendations. Large, high-quality studies were then used to evaluate the completeness of the current recommendations and to analyze additional parameters that could be considered when assessing the usefulness of a third-trimester ultrasound screening.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six international and national sets of guidelines regarding the third-trimester ultrasound were analyzed, showing wide variability in recommendations. While all six support its use, mainly for fetal growth, amniotic fluid, and placental assessment, only ISUOG and SIEOG specify the gestational age at which it should be performed (32-36 weeks). Fetal biometry and anatomy are universally suggested, while recommendations for Doppler studies, biophysical profile, and cervical length are inconsistent. Newer applications, such as pre-eclampsia screening and prediction of labor onset and intrapartum complications, are not yet included. Recent major studies in low-risk populations suggest 36-week gestation as the optimal screening time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is a broad recognition of third-trimester ultrasound being useful for fetal monitoring, but consensus is lacking regarding its routine use in low-risk populations, its outcomes and timing. Major evidence supports ultrasound screening at 36-week gestation in low-risk pregnancies to predict fetal growth restriction, macrosomia, structural anomalies, complications due to placental abnormalities, pre-eclampsia and onset of labor. When preceded by effective risk stratification done earlier in pregnancy, this strategy may enhance pregnancy management potentially improving maternal-fetal outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":8330,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Usefulness and timing of the third-trimester ultrasound scan: a review of guidelines and underlying evidence.\",\"authors\":\"Doaa Emam, Giulia Corbella, Caterina Poziello, Simona Fabozzo, Antonio Farina, Massimo Candiani, Karl Oliver Kagan, Paolo Ivo Cavoretto\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00404-025-08172-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Recommendations regarding the use of third-trimester ultrasound lack universal consensus. Yet, there is evidence which supports its value in assessing fetal growth, fetal well-being, and a number of pregnancy-related complications. This literature review evaluates the available scientific evidence regarding its applications, usefulness, and the timing of the third-trimester scan in a low-risk population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search (PubMed, Embase, Scopus; until April 1st, 2025) identified English-language studies dealing with third-trimester ultrasound screening, its aims, and its best timing. International and national guidelines were reviewed to assess the current recommendations. Large, high-quality studies were then used to evaluate the completeness of the current recommendations and to analyze additional parameters that could be considered when assessing the usefulness of a third-trimester ultrasound screening.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six international and national sets of guidelines regarding the third-trimester ultrasound were analyzed, showing wide variability in recommendations. While all six support its use, mainly for fetal growth, amniotic fluid, and placental assessment, only ISUOG and SIEOG specify the gestational age at which it should be performed (32-36 weeks). Fetal biometry and anatomy are universally suggested, while recommendations for Doppler studies, biophysical profile, and cervical length are inconsistent. Newer applications, such as pre-eclampsia screening and prediction of labor onset and intrapartum complications, are not yet included. Recent major studies in low-risk populations suggest 36-week gestation as the optimal screening time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is a broad recognition of third-trimester ultrasound being useful for fetal monitoring, but consensus is lacking regarding its routine use in low-risk populations, its outcomes and timing. Major evidence supports ultrasound screening at 36-week gestation in low-risk pregnancies to predict fetal growth restriction, macrosomia, structural anomalies, complications due to placental abnormalities, pre-eclampsia and onset of labor. When preceded by effective risk stratification done earlier in pregnancy, this strategy may enhance pregnancy management potentially improving maternal-fetal outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8330,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-025-08172-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-025-08172-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:关于使用孕晚期超声的建议缺乏普遍共识。然而,有证据支持它在评估胎儿生长、胎儿健康和一些妊娠相关并发症方面的价值。这篇文献综述评估了现有的科学证据,关于它的应用,有用性,以及在低风险人群中进行妊娠晚期扫描的时机。方法:文献检索(PubMed, Embase, Scopus;截止到2025年4月1日)确定了涉及妊娠晚期超声筛查的英语研究,其目的和最佳时机。审查了国际和国家准则,以评估目前的建议。然后使用大型,高质量的研究来评估当前建议的完整性,并分析在评估妊娠晚期超声筛查有用性时可以考虑的其他参数。结果:六套国际和国家的指南,关于孕晚期超声分析,显示出广泛的差异建议。虽然这六种方法都支持使用它,主要用于胎儿生长、羊水和胎盘评估,但只有ISUOG和SIEOG明确了应该在胎龄(32-36周)时使用它。胎儿生物测量和解剖是普遍建议的,而多普勒研究、生物物理剖面和宫颈长度的建议是不一致的。新的应用,如先兆子痫筛查和预测分娩和产时并发症,尚未包括在内。最近在低风险人群中进行的主要研究表明,最佳筛查时间为妊娠36周。结论:人们普遍认识到妊娠晚期超声对胎儿监测是有用的,但对其在低风险人群中的常规使用、结果和时机缺乏共识。主要证据支持低风险妊娠36周超声筛查,以预测胎儿生长受限、巨大儿、结构异常、胎盘异常引起的并发症、先兆子痫和临产。如果在妊娠早期进行有效的风险分层,该策略可能会加强妊娠管理,潜在地改善母胎结局。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Usefulness and timing of the third-trimester ultrasound scan: a review of guidelines and underlying evidence.

Objectives: Recommendations regarding the use of third-trimester ultrasound lack universal consensus. Yet, there is evidence which supports its value in assessing fetal growth, fetal well-being, and a number of pregnancy-related complications. This literature review evaluates the available scientific evidence regarding its applications, usefulness, and the timing of the third-trimester scan in a low-risk population.

Methods: A literature search (PubMed, Embase, Scopus; until April 1st, 2025) identified English-language studies dealing with third-trimester ultrasound screening, its aims, and its best timing. International and national guidelines were reviewed to assess the current recommendations. Large, high-quality studies were then used to evaluate the completeness of the current recommendations and to analyze additional parameters that could be considered when assessing the usefulness of a third-trimester ultrasound screening.

Results: Six international and national sets of guidelines regarding the third-trimester ultrasound were analyzed, showing wide variability in recommendations. While all six support its use, mainly for fetal growth, amniotic fluid, and placental assessment, only ISUOG and SIEOG specify the gestational age at which it should be performed (32-36 weeks). Fetal biometry and anatomy are universally suggested, while recommendations for Doppler studies, biophysical profile, and cervical length are inconsistent. Newer applications, such as pre-eclampsia screening and prediction of labor onset and intrapartum complications, are not yet included. Recent major studies in low-risk populations suggest 36-week gestation as the optimal screening time.

Conclusions: There is a broad recognition of third-trimester ultrasound being useful for fetal monitoring, but consensus is lacking regarding its routine use in low-risk populations, its outcomes and timing. Major evidence supports ultrasound screening at 36-week gestation in low-risk pregnancies to predict fetal growth restriction, macrosomia, structural anomalies, complications due to placental abnormalities, pre-eclampsia and onset of labor. When preceded by effective risk stratification done earlier in pregnancy, this strategy may enhance pregnancy management potentially improving maternal-fetal outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
15.40%
发文量
493
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1870 as "Archiv für Gynaekologie", Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics has a long and outstanding tradition. Since 1922 the journal has been the Organ of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. "The Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics" is circulated in over 40 countries world wide and is indexed in "PubMed/Medline" and "Science Citation Index Expanded/Journal Citation Report". The journal publishes invited and submitted reviews; peer-reviewed original articles about clinical topics and basic research as well as news and views and guidelines and position statements from all sub-specialties in gynecology and obstetrics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信