新生儿第二次体外膜氧合的结果:全国登记的倾向评分匹配分析。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Humza Thobani, Muhammad Osama Khan, Timothy F Tirrell, Faraz A Khan, Saleem Islam
{"title":"新生儿第二次体外膜氧合的结果:全国登记的倾向评分匹配分析。","authors":"Humza Thobani, Muhammad Osama Khan, Timothy F Tirrell, Faraz A Khan, Saleem Islam","doi":"10.1097/MAT.0000000000002546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study analyzed the outcomes of neonates undergoing a second run of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) to determine whether there is a benefit to a repeated run. We used Extracorporeal Life Support Organization data to compare neonates undergoing a single versus two runs of ECMO from 2009 to 2019. Baseline characteristics of single-run patients were compared with the first run in two-run patients to identify clinical predictors of a second run of ECMO. Furthermore, we compared overall survival outcomes and ECMO-related complications in single-run and two-run patients, with propensity score matching to adjust for baseline differences between the groups. A total of 12,292 patients undergoing 12,668 ECMO runs met criteria. Neonates requiring a second run had a shorter duration of the first ECMO run (p < 0.001) and were more likely to have had venoarterial cannulation (p < 0.001) than single-run patients. Overall, 33.8% of patients undergoing a second run survived until discharge, compared with 62.9% of patients undergoing a single run only. Propensity score matched analysis demonstrated that patients undergoing two runs were more likely to die, irrespective of underlying physiologic status or ECMO indication (odds ratio [OR] = 3.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.75-4.56). Nevertheless, nearly a third of patients undergoing two ECMO runs survived until discharge, indicating that recannulation may be beneficial in certain patient cohorts.</p>","PeriodicalId":8844,"journal":{"name":"ASAIO Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of a Second Run of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Neonates: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis of a Nationwide Registry.\",\"authors\":\"Humza Thobani, Muhammad Osama Khan, Timothy F Tirrell, Faraz A Khan, Saleem Islam\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MAT.0000000000002546\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study analyzed the outcomes of neonates undergoing a second run of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) to determine whether there is a benefit to a repeated run. We used Extracorporeal Life Support Organization data to compare neonates undergoing a single versus two runs of ECMO from 2009 to 2019. Baseline characteristics of single-run patients were compared with the first run in two-run patients to identify clinical predictors of a second run of ECMO. Furthermore, we compared overall survival outcomes and ECMO-related complications in single-run and two-run patients, with propensity score matching to adjust for baseline differences between the groups. A total of 12,292 patients undergoing 12,668 ECMO runs met criteria. Neonates requiring a second run had a shorter duration of the first ECMO run (p < 0.001) and were more likely to have had venoarterial cannulation (p < 0.001) than single-run patients. Overall, 33.8% of patients undergoing a second run survived until discharge, compared with 62.9% of patients undergoing a single run only. Propensity score matched analysis demonstrated that patients undergoing two runs were more likely to die, irrespective of underlying physiologic status or ECMO indication (odds ratio [OR] = 3.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.75-4.56). Nevertheless, nearly a third of patients undergoing two ECMO runs survived until discharge, indicating that recannulation may be beneficial in certain patient cohorts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8844,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ASAIO Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ASAIO Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000002546\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASAIO Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000002546","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究分析了接受第二次体外膜氧合(ECMO)的新生儿的结果,以确定是否有重复运行的好处。我们使用体外生命支持组织(Extracorporeal Life Support Organization)的数据来比较2009年至2019年接受单次和两次ECMO的新生儿。将单次运行患者的基线特征与第一次运行的两组患者进行比较,以确定第二次运行ECMO的临床预测因素。此外,我们比较了单组和两组患者的总体生存结果和ecmo相关并发症,并使用倾向评分匹配来调整组间基线差异。共有12292例患者接受了12668次ECMO手术,符合标准。需要第二次运行的新生儿第一次ECMO运行的持续时间较短(p < 0.001),并且比单次运行的患者更有可能进行静脉插管(p < 0.001)。总体而言,33.8%接受第二次治疗的患者存活至出院,而仅接受一次治疗的患者存活至出院的比例为62.9%。倾向评分匹配分析表明,无论潜在的生理状态或ECMO适应症如何,接受两次手术的患者更有可能死亡(优势比[or] = 3.53, 95%可信区间[CI] = 2.75-4.56)。然而,近三分之一接受两次ECMO的患者存活至出院,这表明在某些患者队列中,再循环可能是有益的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcomes of a Second Run of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Neonates: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis of a Nationwide Registry.

This study analyzed the outcomes of neonates undergoing a second run of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) to determine whether there is a benefit to a repeated run. We used Extracorporeal Life Support Organization data to compare neonates undergoing a single versus two runs of ECMO from 2009 to 2019. Baseline characteristics of single-run patients were compared with the first run in two-run patients to identify clinical predictors of a second run of ECMO. Furthermore, we compared overall survival outcomes and ECMO-related complications in single-run and two-run patients, with propensity score matching to adjust for baseline differences between the groups. A total of 12,292 patients undergoing 12,668 ECMO runs met criteria. Neonates requiring a second run had a shorter duration of the first ECMO run (p < 0.001) and were more likely to have had venoarterial cannulation (p < 0.001) than single-run patients. Overall, 33.8% of patients undergoing a second run survived until discharge, compared with 62.9% of patients undergoing a single run only. Propensity score matched analysis demonstrated that patients undergoing two runs were more likely to die, irrespective of underlying physiologic status or ECMO indication (odds ratio [OR] = 3.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.75-4.56). Nevertheless, nearly a third of patients undergoing two ECMO runs survived until discharge, indicating that recannulation may be beneficial in certain patient cohorts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ASAIO Journal
ASAIO Journal 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
651
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ASAIO Journal is in the forefront of artificial organ research and development. On the cutting edge of innovative technology, it features peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality that describe research, development, the most recent advances in the design of artificial organ devices and findings from initial testing. Bimonthly, the ASAIO Journal features state-of-the-art investigations, laboratory and clinical trials, and discussions and opinions from experts around the world. The official publication of the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信