唐氏综合征专科诊所痴呆筛查工具的使用。

IF 1.7 4区 生物学 Q3 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Stephanie L Santoro, Alexa Gozdiff Spognardi, Caroline Bregman, Clorinda Cottrell, Elizabeth Oey, Margaret Pulsifer, Brian G Skotko, Amy Torres, Nicolas M Oreskovic
{"title":"唐氏综合征专科诊所痴呆筛查工具的使用。","authors":"Stephanie L Santoro, Alexa Gozdiff Spognardi, Caroline Bregman, Clorinda Cottrell, Elizabeth Oey, Margaret Pulsifer, Brian G Skotko, Amy Torres, Nicolas M Oreskovic","doi":"10.1002/ajmg.a.64251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To study the use of a dementia screening tool in our clinic cohort of adults with Down syndrome. To evaluate the functionality of the NTG-EDSD for Dementia as part of a dementia screening protocol for adults with Down syndrome, we conducted a cohort analysis of patients aged 40 and older followed at the Massachusetts General Hospital Down Syndrome Program, noting any clinical interpretation of dementia or mild cognitive impairment (MCI). From September 2023 to September 2024, 54 NTG-EDSD responses were collected. Of these, 14 patients had a clinical interpretation of dementia and/or MCI, and 40 did not have a clinical interpretation of either. Due to the lack of a defined cutoff for the NTG-EDSD, we evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of the NTG-EDSD across various scoring thresholds: ≥ 30, ≥ 20, ≥ 10, ≥ 5, ≥ 3, ≥ 2, and ≥ 1. Sensitivity decreased, and specificity increased as the threshold score rose. Lower thresholds (e.g., ≥ 1) captured all true positives but at the cost of many false positives, whereas higher thresholds (e.g., ≥ 20) improved specificity and positive predictive value, identifying fewer individuals overall but with greater diagnostic confidence. In a real-world clinical setting, the NTG-EDSD lacks sufficient accuracy as a stand-alone dementia screening tool for adults with Down syndrome but may still be useful for guiding caregiver conversations and identifying the need for further evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":7507,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A","volume":" ","pages":"e64251"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of a Screening Tool for Dementia in a Down Syndrome Specialty Clinic.\",\"authors\":\"Stephanie L Santoro, Alexa Gozdiff Spognardi, Caroline Bregman, Clorinda Cottrell, Elizabeth Oey, Margaret Pulsifer, Brian G Skotko, Amy Torres, Nicolas M Oreskovic\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ajmg.a.64251\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To study the use of a dementia screening tool in our clinic cohort of adults with Down syndrome. To evaluate the functionality of the NTG-EDSD for Dementia as part of a dementia screening protocol for adults with Down syndrome, we conducted a cohort analysis of patients aged 40 and older followed at the Massachusetts General Hospital Down Syndrome Program, noting any clinical interpretation of dementia or mild cognitive impairment (MCI). From September 2023 to September 2024, 54 NTG-EDSD responses were collected. Of these, 14 patients had a clinical interpretation of dementia and/or MCI, and 40 did not have a clinical interpretation of either. Due to the lack of a defined cutoff for the NTG-EDSD, we evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of the NTG-EDSD across various scoring thresholds: ≥ 30, ≥ 20, ≥ 10, ≥ 5, ≥ 3, ≥ 2, and ≥ 1. Sensitivity decreased, and specificity increased as the threshold score rose. Lower thresholds (e.g., ≥ 1) captured all true positives but at the cost of many false positives, whereas higher thresholds (e.g., ≥ 20) improved specificity and positive predictive value, identifying fewer individuals overall but with greater diagnostic confidence. In a real-world clinical setting, the NTG-EDSD lacks sufficient accuracy as a stand-alone dementia screening tool for adults with Down syndrome but may still be useful for guiding caregiver conversations and identifying the need for further evaluation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7507,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e64251\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.64251\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.64251","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究痴呆筛查工具在唐氏综合征成人临床队列中的应用。为了评估NTG-EDSD对痴呆的功能,作为唐氏综合征成人痴呆筛查方案的一部分,我们对马萨诸塞州总医院唐氏综合征项目中40岁及以上的患者进行了队列分析,注意痴呆或轻度认知障碍(MCI)的任何临床解释。从2023年9月至2024年9月,共收集了54份NTG-EDSD问卷。其中,14名患者有痴呆和/或轻度认知障碍的临床解释,40名患者没有任何临床解释。由于NTG-EDSD缺乏明确的截止值,我们评估了不同评分阈值下NTG-EDSD的敏感性和特异性:≥30、≥20、≥10、≥5、≥3、≥2和≥1。随着阈值的升高,敏感性降低,特异性增加。较低的阈值(如≥1)捕获了所有真阳性,但以许多假阳性为代价,而较高的阈值(如≥20)提高了特异性和阳性预测值,总体上识别的个体较少,但诊断信心更强。在现实世界的临床环境中,NTG-EDSD作为单独的唐氏综合征成人痴呆筛查工具缺乏足够的准确性,但在指导护理人员对话和确定进一步评估的需要方面可能仍然有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Use of a Screening Tool for Dementia in a Down Syndrome Specialty Clinic.

To study the use of a dementia screening tool in our clinic cohort of adults with Down syndrome. To evaluate the functionality of the NTG-EDSD for Dementia as part of a dementia screening protocol for adults with Down syndrome, we conducted a cohort analysis of patients aged 40 and older followed at the Massachusetts General Hospital Down Syndrome Program, noting any clinical interpretation of dementia or mild cognitive impairment (MCI). From September 2023 to September 2024, 54 NTG-EDSD responses were collected. Of these, 14 patients had a clinical interpretation of dementia and/or MCI, and 40 did not have a clinical interpretation of either. Due to the lack of a defined cutoff for the NTG-EDSD, we evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of the NTG-EDSD across various scoring thresholds: ≥ 30, ≥ 20, ≥ 10, ≥ 5, ≥ 3, ≥ 2, and ≥ 1. Sensitivity decreased, and specificity increased as the threshold score rose. Lower thresholds (e.g., ≥ 1) captured all true positives but at the cost of many false positives, whereas higher thresholds (e.g., ≥ 20) improved specificity and positive predictive value, identifying fewer individuals overall but with greater diagnostic confidence. In a real-world clinical setting, the NTG-EDSD lacks sufficient accuracy as a stand-alone dementia screening tool for adults with Down syndrome but may still be useful for guiding caregiver conversations and identifying the need for further evaluation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
432
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Medical Genetics - Part A (AJMG) gives you continuous coverage of all biological and medical aspects of genetic disorders and birth defects, as well as in-depth documentation of phenotype analysis within the current context of genotype/phenotype correlations. In addition to Part A , AJMG also publishes two other parts: Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics , covering experimental and clinical investigations of the genetic mechanisms underlying neurologic and psychiatric disorders. Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics , guest-edited collections of thematic reviews of topical interest to the readership of AJMG .
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信