Somayyeh Hormaty, Anwar Nather Seiwan, Bushra H. Rasheed, Hanieh Parvaz, Ali Gharahzadeh, Hamid Ghaznavi
{"title":"生物标志物增强机器学习在卵巢癌早期诊断和预后预测中的研究进展","authors":"Somayyeh Hormaty, Anwar Nather Seiwan, Bushra H. Rasheed, Hanieh Parvaz, Ali Gharahzadeh, Hamid Ghaznavi","doi":"10.1002/cam4.71224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Ovarian cancer (OC) remains the most lethal gynecological malignancy, largely due to its late-stage diagnosis and nonspecific early symptoms. Advances in biomarker identification and machine learning offer promising avenues for improving early detection and prognosis. This review evaluates the role of biomarker-driven ML models in enhancing the early detection, risk stratification, and treatment planning of OC.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We analyzed literature spanning clinical, biomarker, and ML studies, emphasizing key diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers (e.g., CA-125, HE4) and ML techniques (e.g., Random Forest, XGBoost, Neural Networks). The review synthesizes findings from 17 investigations that integrate multi-modal data, including tumor markers, inflammatory, metabolic, and hematologic parameters, to assess ML model performance.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>Biomarker-driven ML models significantly outperform traditional statistical methods, achieving AUC values exceeding 0.90 in diagnosing OC and distinguishing malignant from benign tumors. Ensemble methods (e.g., Random Forest, XGBoost) and deep learning approaches (e.g., RNNs) excel in classification accuracy (up to 99.82%), survival prediction (AUC up to 0.866), and treatment response forecasting. Combining CA-125 and HE4 with additional markers like CRP and NLR enhances specificity and sensitivity. However, limitations such as small sample sizes, lack of external validation, and exclusion of imaging/genomic data hinder clinical adoption.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Biomarker-driven ML represents a transformative approach for OC management, improving diagnostic precision and personalized care. Future research should prioritize multi-center validation, multi-omics integration, and explainable AI to overcome current challenges and enable real-world implementation, potentially reducing OC mortality through earlier detection and optimized treatment.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":139,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Medicine","volume":"14 17","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cam4.71224","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Review on Biomarker-Enhanced Machine Learning for Early Diagnosis and Outcome Prediction in Ovarian Cancer Management\",\"authors\":\"Somayyeh Hormaty, Anwar Nather Seiwan, Bushra H. Rasheed, Hanieh Parvaz, Ali Gharahzadeh, Hamid Ghaznavi\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cam4.71224\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Ovarian cancer (OC) remains the most lethal gynecological malignancy, largely due to its late-stage diagnosis and nonspecific early symptoms. Advances in biomarker identification and machine learning offer promising avenues for improving early detection and prognosis. This review evaluates the role of biomarker-driven ML models in enhancing the early detection, risk stratification, and treatment planning of OC.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We analyzed literature spanning clinical, biomarker, and ML studies, emphasizing key diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers (e.g., CA-125, HE4) and ML techniques (e.g., Random Forest, XGBoost, Neural Networks). The review synthesizes findings from 17 investigations that integrate multi-modal data, including tumor markers, inflammatory, metabolic, and hematologic parameters, to assess ML model performance.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Findings</h3>\\n \\n <p>Biomarker-driven ML models significantly outperform traditional statistical methods, achieving AUC values exceeding 0.90 in diagnosing OC and distinguishing malignant from benign tumors. Ensemble methods (e.g., Random Forest, XGBoost) and deep learning approaches (e.g., RNNs) excel in classification accuracy (up to 99.82%), survival prediction (AUC up to 0.866), and treatment response forecasting. Combining CA-125 and HE4 with additional markers like CRP and NLR enhances specificity and sensitivity. However, limitations such as small sample sizes, lack of external validation, and exclusion of imaging/genomic data hinder clinical adoption.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Biomarker-driven ML represents a transformative approach for OC management, improving diagnostic precision and personalized care. Future research should prioritize multi-center validation, multi-omics integration, and explainable AI to overcome current challenges and enable real-world implementation, potentially reducing OC mortality through earlier detection and optimized treatment.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":139,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Medicine\",\"volume\":\"14 17\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cam4.71224\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cam4.71224\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cam4.71224","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Review on Biomarker-Enhanced Machine Learning for Early Diagnosis and Outcome Prediction in Ovarian Cancer Management
Background
Ovarian cancer (OC) remains the most lethal gynecological malignancy, largely due to its late-stage diagnosis and nonspecific early symptoms. Advances in biomarker identification and machine learning offer promising avenues for improving early detection and prognosis. This review evaluates the role of biomarker-driven ML models in enhancing the early detection, risk stratification, and treatment planning of OC.
Methods
We analyzed literature spanning clinical, biomarker, and ML studies, emphasizing key diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers (e.g., CA-125, HE4) and ML techniques (e.g., Random Forest, XGBoost, Neural Networks). The review synthesizes findings from 17 investigations that integrate multi-modal data, including tumor markers, inflammatory, metabolic, and hematologic parameters, to assess ML model performance.
Findings
Biomarker-driven ML models significantly outperform traditional statistical methods, achieving AUC values exceeding 0.90 in diagnosing OC and distinguishing malignant from benign tumors. Ensemble methods (e.g., Random Forest, XGBoost) and deep learning approaches (e.g., RNNs) excel in classification accuracy (up to 99.82%), survival prediction (AUC up to 0.866), and treatment response forecasting. Combining CA-125 and HE4 with additional markers like CRP and NLR enhances specificity and sensitivity. However, limitations such as small sample sizes, lack of external validation, and exclusion of imaging/genomic data hinder clinical adoption.
Conclusion
Biomarker-driven ML represents a transformative approach for OC management, improving diagnostic precision and personalized care. Future research should prioritize multi-center validation, multi-omics integration, and explainable AI to overcome current challenges and enable real-world implementation, potentially reducing OC mortality through earlier detection and optimized treatment.
期刊介绍:
Cancer Medicine is a peer-reviewed, open access, interdisciplinary journal providing rapid publication of research from global biomedical researchers across the cancer sciences. The journal will consider submissions from all oncologic specialties, including, but not limited to, the following areas:
Clinical Cancer Research
Translational research ∙ clinical trials ∙ chemotherapy ∙ radiation therapy ∙ surgical therapy ∙ clinical observations ∙ clinical guidelines ∙ genetic consultation ∙ ethical considerations
Cancer Biology:
Molecular biology ∙ cellular biology ∙ molecular genetics ∙ genomics ∙ immunology ∙ epigenetics ∙ metabolic studies ∙ proteomics ∙ cytopathology ∙ carcinogenesis ∙ drug discovery and delivery.
Cancer Prevention:
Behavioral science ∙ psychosocial studies ∙ screening ∙ nutrition ∙ epidemiology and prevention ∙ community outreach.
Bioinformatics:
Gene expressions profiles ∙ gene regulation networks ∙ genome bioinformatics ∙ pathwayanalysis ∙ prognostic biomarkers.
Cancer Medicine publishes original research articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and research methods papers, along with invited editorials and commentaries. Original research papers must report well-conducted research with conclusions supported by the data presented in the paper.