微生物介导的野生番茄对入侵昆虫长芽霉的抗性研究

IF 2.7 4区 生物学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Stalin Sarango Flores, Viviane Cordovez, Ben O. Oyserman, Luisa M. Arias Giraldo, Nejc Stopnisek, Jos M. Raaijmakers, Pieter van ’t Hof
{"title":"微生物介导的野生番茄对入侵昆虫长芽霉的抗性研究","authors":"Stalin Sarango Flores,&nbsp;Viviane Cordovez,&nbsp;Ben O. Oyserman,&nbsp;Luisa M. Arias Giraldo,&nbsp;Nejc Stopnisek,&nbsp;Jos M. Raaijmakers,&nbsp;Pieter van ’t Hof","doi":"10.1111/1758-2229.70190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Plant roots are colonised by diverse communities of microorganisms that can affect plant growth and enhance plant resistance to (a) biotic stresses. We investigated the role of the indigenous soil microbiome in the resistance of tomato to the invasive sap-sucking insect <i>Prodiplosis longifila</i> (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae). Native and agricultural soils were sampled from the Andes in Southern Ecuador and tested, in greenhouse bioassays, for leaf tissue damage caused by <i>P. longifila</i> on domesticated <i>Solanum lycopersicum</i> cv. Moneymaker and wild tomato <i>S. pimpinellifolium</i>. We observed no significant differences in insect damage between domesticated and wild tomatoes grown in live native or agricultural soils. However, when grown in sterilised native and agricultural soils, wild tomato was more severely affected by the insect than the domesticated tomato. Microbiome analyses revealed that soil sterilisation impacted overall rhizobacterial diversity and abundance in wild tomato. Particularly, <i>Actinoplanes</i> abundance was reduced upon sterilisation, which significantly correlated with loss of insect resistance. Metagenome analyses and genome assembly of Micromonosporaceae (<i>Actinoplanes</i> family) suggested a putative association between motility, chemotaxis, membrane transport, chorismate, and lanthipeptide biosynthesis and insect resistance. This indicates that wild <i>S. pimpinellifolium</i>, in contrast to domesticated <i>S. lycopersicum</i>, relies on specific members of the root-associated microbiome for <i>P. longifila</i> protection.</p>","PeriodicalId":163,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Microbiology Reports","volume":"17 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://enviromicro-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1758-2229.70190","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Microbiome-Mediated Resistance of Wild Tomato to the Invasive Insect Prodiplosis longifila\",\"authors\":\"Stalin Sarango Flores,&nbsp;Viviane Cordovez,&nbsp;Ben O. Oyserman,&nbsp;Luisa M. Arias Giraldo,&nbsp;Nejc Stopnisek,&nbsp;Jos M. Raaijmakers,&nbsp;Pieter van ’t Hof\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1758-2229.70190\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Plant roots are colonised by diverse communities of microorganisms that can affect plant growth and enhance plant resistance to (a) biotic stresses. We investigated the role of the indigenous soil microbiome in the resistance of tomato to the invasive sap-sucking insect <i>Prodiplosis longifila</i> (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae). Native and agricultural soils were sampled from the Andes in Southern Ecuador and tested, in greenhouse bioassays, for leaf tissue damage caused by <i>P. longifila</i> on domesticated <i>Solanum lycopersicum</i> cv. Moneymaker and wild tomato <i>S. pimpinellifolium</i>. We observed no significant differences in insect damage between domesticated and wild tomatoes grown in live native or agricultural soils. However, when grown in sterilised native and agricultural soils, wild tomato was more severely affected by the insect than the domesticated tomato. Microbiome analyses revealed that soil sterilisation impacted overall rhizobacterial diversity and abundance in wild tomato. Particularly, <i>Actinoplanes</i> abundance was reduced upon sterilisation, which significantly correlated with loss of insect resistance. Metagenome analyses and genome assembly of Micromonosporaceae (<i>Actinoplanes</i> family) suggested a putative association between motility, chemotaxis, membrane transport, chorismate, and lanthipeptide biosynthesis and insect resistance. This indicates that wild <i>S. pimpinellifolium</i>, in contrast to domesticated <i>S. lycopersicum</i>, relies on specific members of the root-associated microbiome for <i>P. longifila</i> protection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":163,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Microbiology Reports\",\"volume\":\"17 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://enviromicro-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1758-2229.70190\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Microbiology Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://enviromicro-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1758-2229.70190\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Microbiology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://enviromicro-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1758-2229.70190","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

植物根系被不同的微生物群落定植,这些微生物群落可以影响植物生长并增强植物对(a)生物胁迫的抗性。研究了土壤微生物群在番茄抗入侵吸血昆虫长芽蚜(Prodiplosis longifila)中的作用。从厄瓜多尔南部安第斯山脉的原生土壤和农业土壤中取样,并在温室生物测定中测试了长丝状假丝菌对驯化番茄茄造成的叶片组织损伤。野番茄和野番茄。我们观察到在原生土壤或农业土壤中种植的驯化番茄和野生番茄在昆虫危害方面没有显著差异。然而,当种植在无菌的本地和农业土壤中时,野生番茄比驯化番茄受昆虫的影响更严重。微生物组分析表明,土壤灭菌影响了野生番茄根细菌的多样性和丰度。特别是放线素平面丰度在绝育后降低,这与昆虫抗性的丧失显著相关。微单孢菌科放线菌的宏基因组分析和基因组组装表明,微单孢菌的运动性、趋化性、膜转运、choris酸盐和硫肽生物合成与昆虫抗性之间可能存在关联。这表明,与驯化的葡萄球菌相比,野生葡萄球菌依赖于根相关微生物组的特定成员来保护长叶葡萄球菌。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Microbiome-Mediated Resistance of Wild Tomato to the Invasive Insect Prodiplosis longifila

Microbiome-Mediated Resistance of Wild Tomato to the Invasive Insect Prodiplosis longifila

Microbiome-Mediated Resistance of Wild Tomato to the Invasive Insect Prodiplosis longifila

Microbiome-Mediated Resistance of Wild Tomato to the Invasive Insect Prodiplosis longifila

Microbiome-Mediated Resistance of Wild Tomato to the Invasive Insect Prodiplosis longifila

Plant roots are colonised by diverse communities of microorganisms that can affect plant growth and enhance plant resistance to (a) biotic stresses. We investigated the role of the indigenous soil microbiome in the resistance of tomato to the invasive sap-sucking insect Prodiplosis longifila (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae). Native and agricultural soils were sampled from the Andes in Southern Ecuador and tested, in greenhouse bioassays, for leaf tissue damage caused by P. longifila on domesticated Solanum lycopersicum cv. Moneymaker and wild tomato S. pimpinellifolium. We observed no significant differences in insect damage between domesticated and wild tomatoes grown in live native or agricultural soils. However, when grown in sterilised native and agricultural soils, wild tomato was more severely affected by the insect than the domesticated tomato. Microbiome analyses revealed that soil sterilisation impacted overall rhizobacterial diversity and abundance in wild tomato. Particularly, Actinoplanes abundance was reduced upon sterilisation, which significantly correlated with loss of insect resistance. Metagenome analyses and genome assembly of Micromonosporaceae (Actinoplanes family) suggested a putative association between motility, chemotaxis, membrane transport, chorismate, and lanthipeptide biosynthesis and insect resistance. This indicates that wild S. pimpinellifolium, in contrast to domesticated S. lycopersicum, relies on specific members of the root-associated microbiome for P. longifila protection.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Microbiology Reports
Environmental Microbiology Reports ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-MICROBIOLOGY
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.00%
发文量
91
审稿时长
3.0 months
期刊介绍: The journal is identical in scope to Environmental Microbiology, shares the same editorial team and submission site, and will apply the same high level acceptance criteria. The two journals will be mutually supportive and evolve side-by-side. Environmental Microbiology Reports provides a high profile vehicle for publication of the most innovative, original and rigorous research in the field. The scope of the Journal encompasses the diversity of current research on microbial processes in the environment, microbial communities, interactions and evolution and includes, but is not limited to, the following: the structure, activities and communal behaviour of microbial communities microbial community genetics and evolutionary processes microbial symbioses, microbial interactions and interactions with plants, animals and abiotic factors microbes in the tree of life, microbial diversification and evolution population biology and clonal structure microbial metabolic and structural diversity microbial physiology, growth and survival microbes and surfaces, adhesion and biofouling responses to environmental signals and stress factors modelling and theory development pollution microbiology extremophiles and life in extreme and unusual little-explored habitats element cycles and biogeochemical processes, primary and secondary production microbes in a changing world, microbially-influenced global changes evolution and diversity of archaeal and bacterial viruses new technological developments in microbial ecology and evolution, in particular for the study of activities of microbial communities, non-culturable microorganisms and emerging pathogens.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信