治理深海:国家管辖范围以外地区深海采矿的经济、生态和法律观点

IF 3.7 2区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Nathalie Hilmi , Wassim Dbouk , Matías Crisóstomo , Cheyenne Couvreur , Gisele Arruda , Annaëlle Aziza , Narissa Bax
{"title":"治理深海:国家管辖范围以外地区深海采矿的经济、生态和法律观点","authors":"Nathalie Hilmi ,&nbsp;Wassim Dbouk ,&nbsp;Matías Crisóstomo ,&nbsp;Cheyenne Couvreur ,&nbsp;Gisele Arruda ,&nbsp;Annaëlle Aziza ,&nbsp;Narissa Bax","doi":"10.1016/j.marpol.2025.106887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Environmental protection is a critical consideration for activities in the ocean to ensure the long-term sustainable use of marine resources, prevent irreversible ecological harm, and fulfill international legal obligations. In this article, we examine how economic interests in deep-sea mining, emerging scientific knowledge about environmental impacts, and recent legal developments under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) shape States’ negotiation positions in the development of the Mining Code within the International Seabed Authority. We undertake a rigorous multidisciplinary review of economic, environmental, and legal literature to identify and critically assess the key factors influencing States’ strategies during these complex negotiations. By analyzing each domain, we clarify how competing economic imperatives, evolving scientific evidence on biodiversity and carbon cycle disruption, and shifting legal norms independently inform the negotiation process and its implications for the Mining Code’s substantive content and governance mechanisms. Drawing on recent jurisprudence from the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, which elucidates the relationship between UNCLOS and international climate frameworks under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and Paris Agreement, we highlight the increasing prominence of environmental protection within States’ legal duties. We argue that this evolving legal context supports the prioritization of precautionary and protective measures in the Mining Code and encourages cautious approaches that address scientific uncertainty and climate-related risks. This may include delaying the adoption of the Code or integrating stronger safeguards to prevent ecosystem collapse and promote responsible marine stewardship.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48427,"journal":{"name":"Marine Policy","volume":"183 ","pages":"Article 106887"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Governing the deep: Economic, ecological, and legal perspectives on deep-sea mining in areas beyond national jurisdiction\",\"authors\":\"Nathalie Hilmi ,&nbsp;Wassim Dbouk ,&nbsp;Matías Crisóstomo ,&nbsp;Cheyenne Couvreur ,&nbsp;Gisele Arruda ,&nbsp;Annaëlle Aziza ,&nbsp;Narissa Bax\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.marpol.2025.106887\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Environmental protection is a critical consideration for activities in the ocean to ensure the long-term sustainable use of marine resources, prevent irreversible ecological harm, and fulfill international legal obligations. In this article, we examine how economic interests in deep-sea mining, emerging scientific knowledge about environmental impacts, and recent legal developments under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) shape States’ negotiation positions in the development of the Mining Code within the International Seabed Authority. We undertake a rigorous multidisciplinary review of economic, environmental, and legal literature to identify and critically assess the key factors influencing States’ strategies during these complex negotiations. By analyzing each domain, we clarify how competing economic imperatives, evolving scientific evidence on biodiversity and carbon cycle disruption, and shifting legal norms independently inform the negotiation process and its implications for the Mining Code’s substantive content and governance mechanisms. Drawing on recent jurisprudence from the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, which elucidates the relationship between UNCLOS and international climate frameworks under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and Paris Agreement, we highlight the increasing prominence of environmental protection within States’ legal duties. We argue that this evolving legal context supports the prioritization of precautionary and protective measures in the Mining Code and encourages cautious approaches that address scientific uncertainty and climate-related risks. This may include delaying the adoption of the Code or integrating stronger safeguards to prevent ecosystem collapse and promote responsible marine stewardship.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48427,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Marine Policy\",\"volume\":\"183 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106887\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Marine Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X25003033\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X25003033","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

环境保护是确保海洋资源长期可持续利用、防止不可逆转的生态损害和履行国际法律义务的重要考虑因素。在本文中,我们研究了深海采矿的经济利益、有关环境影响的新兴科学知识以及《联合国海洋法公约》(UNCLOS)下的最新法律发展如何影响各国在国际海底管理局制定《采矿法》过程中的谈判立场。我们对经济、环境和法律文献进行严格的多学科审查,以确定和严格评估在这些复杂谈判期间影响各国战略的关键因素。通过对每个领域的分析,我们阐明了相互竞争的经济需求、生物多样性和碳循环破坏方面不断发展的科学证据以及不断变化的法律规范如何独立地影响谈判进程及其对《采矿法》实质性内容和治理机制的影响。国际海洋法法庭最近的判例阐明了《联合国海洋法公约》与《联合国气候变化框架公约》和《巴黎协定》下的国际气候框架之间的关系,我们借鉴了这些判例,强调环境保护在各国法律义务中的日益重要地位。我们认为,这种不断发展的法律背景支持《采矿法》中预防和保护措施的优先级,并鼓励采取谨慎的方法来解决科学不确定性和气候相关风险。这可能包括推迟通过《守则》或整合更强有力的保障措施,以防止生态系统崩溃和促进负责任的海洋管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Governing the deep: Economic, ecological, and legal perspectives on deep-sea mining in areas beyond national jurisdiction
Environmental protection is a critical consideration for activities in the ocean to ensure the long-term sustainable use of marine resources, prevent irreversible ecological harm, and fulfill international legal obligations. In this article, we examine how economic interests in deep-sea mining, emerging scientific knowledge about environmental impacts, and recent legal developments under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) shape States’ negotiation positions in the development of the Mining Code within the International Seabed Authority. We undertake a rigorous multidisciplinary review of economic, environmental, and legal literature to identify and critically assess the key factors influencing States’ strategies during these complex negotiations. By analyzing each domain, we clarify how competing economic imperatives, evolving scientific evidence on biodiversity and carbon cycle disruption, and shifting legal norms independently inform the negotiation process and its implications for the Mining Code’s substantive content and governance mechanisms. Drawing on recent jurisprudence from the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, which elucidates the relationship between UNCLOS and international climate frameworks under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and Paris Agreement, we highlight the increasing prominence of environmental protection within States’ legal duties. We argue that this evolving legal context supports the prioritization of precautionary and protective measures in the Mining Code and encourages cautious approaches that address scientific uncertainty and climate-related risks. This may include delaying the adoption of the Code or integrating stronger safeguards to prevent ecosystem collapse and promote responsible marine stewardship.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Marine Policy
Marine Policy Multiple-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
13.20%
发文量
428
期刊介绍: Marine Policy is the leading journal of ocean policy studies. It offers researchers, analysts and policy makers a unique combination of analyses in the principal social science disciplines relevant to the formulation of marine policy. Major articles are contributed by specialists in marine affairs, including marine economists and marine resource managers, political scientists, marine scientists, international lawyers, geographers and anthropologists. Drawing on their expertise and research, the journal covers: international, regional and national marine policies; institutional arrangements for the management and regulation of marine activities, including fisheries and shipping; conflict resolution; marine pollution and environment; conservation and use of marine resources. Regular features of Marine Policy include research reports, conference reports and reports on current developments to keep readers up-to-date with the latest developments and research in ocean affairs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信