黑色是指昆虫吗?调查食品颜色对昆虫成分的感知可能性和消费者接受程度的影响

IF 4.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Zining Wang , Zhuo Gong , Jaewoo Park
{"title":"黑色是指昆虫吗?调查食品颜色对昆虫成分的感知可能性和消费者接受程度的影响","authors":"Zining Wang ,&nbsp;Zhuo Gong ,&nbsp;Jaewoo Park","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To mitigate the aversion triggered by visible insect cues, many food manufacturers process insect ingredients to make them visually imperceptible and incorporate them into familiar products. This strategy increases ambiguity for consumers in judging whether a product contains insect ingredients. In this context, this research examines whether a subtle visual cue—food color lightness—affects consumers' inferences about the presence of insect ingredients and their subsequent product acceptance. Across two online experiments, participants evaluated lighter- and darker-colored bread (Study 1) and cookies (Study 2). Results consistently showed that darker-colored foods led to a higher perceived likelihood of containing insect ingredients. Although the total effect of food color on consumer acceptance was not significant, mediation analyses revealed a significant indirect effect: darker color increased the perceived likelihood of insect content, which in turn significantly reduced acceptance. Moreover, Study 2 demonstrated that individual attitudes toward entomophagy moderated this indirect effect: it was negative for participants with unfavorable attitudes but reversed for those with highly positive attitudes. These findings contribute to the sensory marketing and food perception literature and provide valuable practical insights for developing insect-based food products.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":"135 ","pages":"Article 105689"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does dark mean insect? Investigating the impact of food color on the perceived likelihood of insect ingredients and consumer acceptance\",\"authors\":\"Zining Wang ,&nbsp;Zhuo Gong ,&nbsp;Jaewoo Park\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105689\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>To mitigate the aversion triggered by visible insect cues, many food manufacturers process insect ingredients to make them visually imperceptible and incorporate them into familiar products. This strategy increases ambiguity for consumers in judging whether a product contains insect ingredients. In this context, this research examines whether a subtle visual cue—food color lightness—affects consumers' inferences about the presence of insect ingredients and their subsequent product acceptance. Across two online experiments, participants evaluated lighter- and darker-colored bread (Study 1) and cookies (Study 2). Results consistently showed that darker-colored foods led to a higher perceived likelihood of containing insect ingredients. Although the total effect of food color on consumer acceptance was not significant, mediation analyses revealed a significant indirect effect: darker color increased the perceived likelihood of insect content, which in turn significantly reduced acceptance. Moreover, Study 2 demonstrated that individual attitudes toward entomophagy moderated this indirect effect: it was negative for participants with unfavorable attitudes but reversed for those with highly positive attitudes. These findings contribute to the sensory marketing and food perception literature and provide valuable practical insights for developing insect-based food products.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food Quality and Preference\",\"volume\":\"135 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105689\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food Quality and Preference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329325002642\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329325002642","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了减轻由可见的昆虫线索引发的厌恶,许多食品制造商对昆虫成分进行加工,使其在视觉上难以察觉,并将其纳入熟悉的产品中。这种策略增加了消费者在判断产品是否含有昆虫成分时的模糊性。在此背景下,本研究考察了一种微妙的视觉线索——食品颜色的亮度——是否会影响消费者对昆虫成分存在的推断以及他们随后对产品的接受程度。在两个在线实验中,参与者评估了浅色和深色面包(研究1)和饼干(研究2)。结果一致表明,颜色较深的食物更容易被认为含有昆虫成分。虽然食品颜色对消费者接受度的总影响不显著,但中介分析揭示了显著的间接影响:较深的颜色增加了昆虫含量的感知可能性,这反过来又显著降低了接受度。此外,研究2表明,个体对食虫行为的态度缓和了这种间接影响:对食虫行为持消极态度的参与者对食虫行为的态度为负,而对食虫行为持高度积极态度的参与者则相反。这些发现有助于感官营销和食物感知的文献,并为开发以昆虫为基础的食品提供有价值的实践见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does dark mean insect? Investigating the impact of food color on the perceived likelihood of insect ingredients and consumer acceptance
To mitigate the aversion triggered by visible insect cues, many food manufacturers process insect ingredients to make them visually imperceptible and incorporate them into familiar products. This strategy increases ambiguity for consumers in judging whether a product contains insect ingredients. In this context, this research examines whether a subtle visual cue—food color lightness—affects consumers' inferences about the presence of insect ingredients and their subsequent product acceptance. Across two online experiments, participants evaluated lighter- and darker-colored bread (Study 1) and cookies (Study 2). Results consistently showed that darker-colored foods led to a higher perceived likelihood of containing insect ingredients. Although the total effect of food color on consumer acceptance was not significant, mediation analyses revealed a significant indirect effect: darker color increased the perceived likelihood of insect content, which in turn significantly reduced acceptance. Moreover, Study 2 demonstrated that individual attitudes toward entomophagy moderated this indirect effect: it was negative for participants with unfavorable attitudes but reversed for those with highly positive attitudes. These findings contribute to the sensory marketing and food perception literature and provide valuable practical insights for developing insect-based food products.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Food Quality and Preference
Food Quality and Preference 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
15.10%
发文量
263
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信