Yi Zhang , Erica van Herpen , Mario Pandelaere , Maggie Geuens
{"title":"当分享是恐惧时:由于害怕接受者的负面反应而犹豫分享不理想的食物","authors":"Yi Zhang , Erica van Herpen , Mario Pandelaere , Maggie Geuens","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Sharing food directly or through food banks has emerged as a viable strategy to combat food waste. However, scant work has investigated what and why consumers choose to share in this context. Through five online experiments and one lab experiment, we demonstrate that consumers are less likely to share food with suboptimal attributes that do not influence intrinsic quality than optimal food. This is because consumers anticipate that recipients will respond less positively to suboptimal than optimal food. Notably, this negative effect diminishes when food banks transform food into meals (making the suboptimality invisible to recipients) or display campaign signage highlighting recipient appreciation for every donation. Additionally, we identify a discrepancy between givers’ anticipation and recipients’ actual responses, revealing that the negative effect of suboptimality on recipient responses is smaller than givers anticipate. Our findings offer insights into consumers’ hesitance to share suboptimal food and how to address it.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":"201 ","pages":"Article 115694"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When sharing is scaring: hesitance to share suboptimal food due to fear of negative responses from recipients\",\"authors\":\"Yi Zhang , Erica van Herpen , Mario Pandelaere , Maggie Geuens\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115694\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Sharing food directly or through food banks has emerged as a viable strategy to combat food waste. However, scant work has investigated what and why consumers choose to share in this context. Through five online experiments and one lab experiment, we demonstrate that consumers are less likely to share food with suboptimal attributes that do not influence intrinsic quality than optimal food. This is because consumers anticipate that recipients will respond less positively to suboptimal than optimal food. Notably, this negative effect diminishes when food banks transform food into meals (making the suboptimality invisible to recipients) or display campaign signage highlighting recipient appreciation for every donation. Additionally, we identify a discrepancy between givers’ anticipation and recipients’ actual responses, revealing that the negative effect of suboptimality on recipient responses is smaller than givers anticipate. Our findings offer insights into consumers’ hesitance to share suboptimal food and how to address it.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Business Research\",\"volume\":\"201 \",\"pages\":\"Article 115694\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Business Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014829632500517X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014829632500517X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
When sharing is scaring: hesitance to share suboptimal food due to fear of negative responses from recipients
Sharing food directly or through food banks has emerged as a viable strategy to combat food waste. However, scant work has investigated what and why consumers choose to share in this context. Through five online experiments and one lab experiment, we demonstrate that consumers are less likely to share food with suboptimal attributes that do not influence intrinsic quality than optimal food. This is because consumers anticipate that recipients will respond less positively to suboptimal than optimal food. Notably, this negative effect diminishes when food banks transform food into meals (making the suboptimality invisible to recipients) or display campaign signage highlighting recipient appreciation for every donation. Additionally, we identify a discrepancy between givers’ anticipation and recipients’ actual responses, revealing that the negative effect of suboptimality on recipient responses is smaller than givers anticipate. Our findings offer insights into consumers’ hesitance to share suboptimal food and how to address it.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.