当分享是恐惧时:由于害怕接受者的负面反应而犹豫分享不理想的食物

IF 9.8 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Yi Zhang , Erica van Herpen , Mario Pandelaere , Maggie Geuens
{"title":"当分享是恐惧时:由于害怕接受者的负面反应而犹豫分享不理想的食物","authors":"Yi Zhang ,&nbsp;Erica van Herpen ,&nbsp;Mario Pandelaere ,&nbsp;Maggie Geuens","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Sharing food directly or through food banks has emerged as a viable strategy to combat food waste. However, scant work has investigated what and why consumers choose to share in this context. Through five online experiments and one lab experiment, we demonstrate that consumers are less likely to share food with suboptimal attributes that do not influence intrinsic quality than optimal food. This is because consumers anticipate that recipients will respond less positively to suboptimal than optimal food. Notably, this negative effect diminishes when food banks transform food into meals (making the suboptimality invisible to recipients) or display campaign signage highlighting recipient appreciation for every donation. Additionally, we identify a discrepancy between givers’ anticipation and recipients’ actual responses, revealing that the negative effect of suboptimality on recipient responses is smaller than givers anticipate. Our findings offer insights into consumers’ hesitance to share suboptimal food and how to address it.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":"201 ","pages":"Article 115694"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When sharing is scaring: hesitance to share suboptimal food due to fear of negative responses from recipients\",\"authors\":\"Yi Zhang ,&nbsp;Erica van Herpen ,&nbsp;Mario Pandelaere ,&nbsp;Maggie Geuens\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115694\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Sharing food directly or through food banks has emerged as a viable strategy to combat food waste. However, scant work has investigated what and why consumers choose to share in this context. Through five online experiments and one lab experiment, we demonstrate that consumers are less likely to share food with suboptimal attributes that do not influence intrinsic quality than optimal food. This is because consumers anticipate that recipients will respond less positively to suboptimal than optimal food. Notably, this negative effect diminishes when food banks transform food into meals (making the suboptimality invisible to recipients) or display campaign signage highlighting recipient appreciation for every donation. Additionally, we identify a discrepancy between givers’ anticipation and recipients’ actual responses, revealing that the negative effect of suboptimality on recipient responses is smaller than givers anticipate. Our findings offer insights into consumers’ hesitance to share suboptimal food and how to address it.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Business Research\",\"volume\":\"201 \",\"pages\":\"Article 115694\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Business Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014829632500517X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014829632500517X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

直接分享食物或通过食物银行分享食物已成为打击食物浪费的可行策略。然而,很少有人研究消费者在这种情况下选择分享的内容和原因。通过五个在线实验和一个实验室实验,我们证明消费者不太可能分享具有不影响内在质量的次优属性的食品,而不是最优食品。这是因为消费者预期接受者对次优食品的反应不如对优食品的反应积极。值得注意的是,当食物银行将食物转化为食物(使接受者看不到次优性)或展示活动标志时,这种负面影响就会减弱,这些活动标志突出了接受者对每一笔捐赠的感激之情。此外,我们发现了施予者的预期和受赠者的实际反应之间的差异,揭示了次优性对受赠者反应的负面影响小于施予者的预期。我们的研究结果为消费者在分享不太理想的食物时的犹豫以及如何解决这个问题提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
When sharing is scaring: hesitance to share suboptimal food due to fear of negative responses from recipients
Sharing food directly or through food banks has emerged as a viable strategy to combat food waste. However, scant work has investigated what and why consumers choose to share in this context. Through five online experiments and one lab experiment, we demonstrate that consumers are less likely to share food with suboptimal attributes that do not influence intrinsic quality than optimal food. This is because consumers anticipate that recipients will respond less positively to suboptimal than optimal food. Notably, this negative effect diminishes when food banks transform food into meals (making the suboptimality invisible to recipients) or display campaign signage highlighting recipient appreciation for every donation. Additionally, we identify a discrepancy between givers’ anticipation and recipients’ actual responses, revealing that the negative effect of suboptimality on recipient responses is smaller than givers anticipate. Our findings offer insights into consumers’ hesitance to share suboptimal food and how to address it.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.30
自引率
10.60%
发文量
956
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信