半正式组织的管理:双灵巧创新的混合设计

IF 9.8 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Amadou Lô , Victor Dos Santos Paulino , Christina Theodoraki
{"title":"半正式组织的管理:双灵巧创新的混合设计","authors":"Amadou Lô ,&nbsp;Victor Dos Santos Paulino ,&nbsp;Christina Theodoraki","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In this study, we investigate an alternative approach to foster ambidextrous innovation through a hybrid design between formal and informal organization: the semiformal organization. This exploration challenges the traditional ambidexterity literature that focuses on the isolated roles of formal and informal ties in innovation activities. Addressing this gap, our paper uncovers the significant role of semiformal organizations in balancing exploitation and exploration activities. Central to our study is a two-year and a half investigation of a leading company in the space industry, drawing insights from 41 detailed interviews. Our findings significantly expand our comprehension of hybrid designs between formal and informal organizations, based on three managerial practices: (a) cultivating a paradoxical dynamic for the social network, (b) harnessing the polyvalence of the spaces, and (c) influence brokering between the semiformal and the formal organization. This research underscores the necessity of maintaining a paradox-embracing perspective to stimulate ambidexterity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":"201 ","pages":"Article 115644"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Managing the semiformal organization: A hybrid design for ambidextrous innovation\",\"authors\":\"Amadou Lô ,&nbsp;Victor Dos Santos Paulino ,&nbsp;Christina Theodoraki\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115644\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In this study, we investigate an alternative approach to foster ambidextrous innovation through a hybrid design between formal and informal organization: the semiformal organization. This exploration challenges the traditional ambidexterity literature that focuses on the isolated roles of formal and informal ties in innovation activities. Addressing this gap, our paper uncovers the significant role of semiformal organizations in balancing exploitation and exploration activities. Central to our study is a two-year and a half investigation of a leading company in the space industry, drawing insights from 41 detailed interviews. Our findings significantly expand our comprehension of hybrid designs between formal and informal organizations, based on three managerial practices: (a) cultivating a paradoxical dynamic for the social network, (b) harnessing the polyvalence of the spaces, and (c) influence brokering between the semiformal and the formal organization. This research underscores the necessity of maintaining a paradox-embracing perspective to stimulate ambidexterity.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Business Research\",\"volume\":\"201 \",\"pages\":\"Article 115644\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Business Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325004679\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325004679","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本研究中,我们探讨了一种通过正式组织和非正式组织之间的混合设计来促进双灵巧创新的替代方法:半正式组织。这一探索挑战了传统的二元性文献,该文献关注的是创新活动中正式和非正式关系的孤立作用。为了解决这一差距,我们的论文揭示了半正式组织在平衡开采和勘探活动方面的重要作用。我们研究的核心是对航天行业的一家领先公司进行了为期两年半的调查,从41个详细访谈中得出了见解。我们的研究结果极大地扩展了我们对正式组织和非正式组织之间混合设计的理解,基于三种管理实践:(a)培养社会网络的矛盾动态,(b)利用空间的多价性,以及(c)在半正式组织和正式组织之间的影响中介。这项研究强调了保持一种悖论拥抱的观点来刺激两面性的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Managing the semiformal organization: A hybrid design for ambidextrous innovation
In this study, we investigate an alternative approach to foster ambidextrous innovation through a hybrid design between formal and informal organization: the semiformal organization. This exploration challenges the traditional ambidexterity literature that focuses on the isolated roles of formal and informal ties in innovation activities. Addressing this gap, our paper uncovers the significant role of semiformal organizations in balancing exploitation and exploration activities. Central to our study is a two-year and a half investigation of a leading company in the space industry, drawing insights from 41 detailed interviews. Our findings significantly expand our comprehension of hybrid designs between formal and informal organizations, based on three managerial practices: (a) cultivating a paradoxical dynamic for the social network, (b) harnessing the polyvalence of the spaces, and (c) influence brokering between the semiformal and the formal organization. This research underscores the necessity of maintaining a paradox-embracing perspective to stimulate ambidexterity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.30
自引率
10.60%
发文量
956
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信