利用多中心ILIAS登记的压降系数从微血管功能障碍中描绘冠状动脉心外膜狭窄状态

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Shreyash M. Manegaonkar , Mohamed A. Effat , Tim P. van de Hoef , Joo Myung Lee , Coen K.M. Boerhout , Seung Hun Lee , Guus A. de Waard , Ji Hyun Jung , Hernan Mejia Renteria , Masahiro Hoshino , Mauro Echavarria Pinto , Martijn Meuwissen , Hitoshi Matsuo , Maribel Madera Cambero , Ashkan Eftekhari , Tadashi Murai , Koen Marques , Joon Hyung Doh , Evald H. Christiansen , Chang Wook Nam , Rupak K. Banerjee
{"title":"利用多中心ILIAS登记的压降系数从微血管功能障碍中描绘冠状动脉心外膜狭窄状态","authors":"Shreyash M. Manegaonkar ,&nbsp;Mohamed A. Effat ,&nbsp;Tim P. van de Hoef ,&nbsp;Joo Myung Lee ,&nbsp;Coen K.M. Boerhout ,&nbsp;Seung Hun Lee ,&nbsp;Guus A. de Waard ,&nbsp;Ji Hyun Jung ,&nbsp;Hernan Mejia Renteria ,&nbsp;Masahiro Hoshino ,&nbsp;Mauro Echavarria Pinto ,&nbsp;Martijn Meuwissen ,&nbsp;Hitoshi Matsuo ,&nbsp;Maribel Madera Cambero ,&nbsp;Ashkan Eftekhari ,&nbsp;Tadashi Murai ,&nbsp;Koen Marques ,&nbsp;Joon Hyung Doh ,&nbsp;Evald H. Christiansen ,&nbsp;Chang Wook Nam ,&nbsp;Rupak K. Banerjee","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcard.2025.133864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Pressure-based fractional flow reserve (FFR) and flow-based coronary flow reserve (CFR) assess the functional status of coronary artery disease (CAD) during cardiac catheterization. Complex hemodynamics may not be adequately explained by either pressure or flow alone. Consequently, pressure-drop coefficient (CDP, the ratio between pressure-drop across a stenosis and distal dynamic pressure) that combines both pressure and flow measurements has been developed to distinguish between epicardial stenosis (ES) and microvascular disease (MVD).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A global multicenter ILIAS registry was used to analyze CDP in relation to FFR/CFR among 961 subjects for 1342 intracoronary pressure and flow measurements. The correlation between FFR and CFR with CDP was analyzed. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the CDP cut-off value, corresponding to FFR = 0.80 and 0.75 and CFR = 2.0.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Both linear (<em>r</em> = 0.68) and logarithmic (<em>r</em> = 0.75) correlation of CDP with combined FFR and CFR improved (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) in relation to either FFR or CFR individually. The CDP cut-off values to predict the four possible disease combinations based on FFR(0.8) and CFR(2.0) are: 1) 0 to 15.78 (absence of both diseases); 2) 15.78 to 27.25 (absence of ES and presence of MVD); 3) 27.25 to 73.77 (presence of ES and absence of MVD); and 4) CDP ≥ 73.77 (presence of both diseases). Similar CDP cut-off ranges were obtained for FFR = 0.75 and CFR = 2.0.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The established diagnostic cut-off values of CDP can differentiate between the concomitant ES and MVD, improving the functional assessment of CAD.</div></div><div><h3>Condensed abstract</h3><div>Fractional flow reserve and coronary flow reserve assess the functional status of coronary artery disease (CAD) during cardiac catheterization, but the complex hemodynamics may not be adequately explained by either parameter alone. Pressure-drop coefficient (CDP) is a novel composite parameter that combines both pressure and flow measurements to delineate between epicardial stenosis (ES) and microvascular disease (MVD). ILIAS registry was used to analyze the diagnostic performance of CDP relative to FFR/CFR. The receiver operating characteristic curve was used to determine the CDP cut-off values, that delineate the various combinations of ES and MVD; hence, improving the functional assessment of CAD.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13710,"journal":{"name":"International journal of cardiology","volume":"442 ","pages":"Article 133864"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Delineating coronary epicardial stenosis status from microvascular dysfunction using pressure-drop coefficient from multicenter ILIAS registry\",\"authors\":\"Shreyash M. Manegaonkar ,&nbsp;Mohamed A. Effat ,&nbsp;Tim P. van de Hoef ,&nbsp;Joo Myung Lee ,&nbsp;Coen K.M. Boerhout ,&nbsp;Seung Hun Lee ,&nbsp;Guus A. de Waard ,&nbsp;Ji Hyun Jung ,&nbsp;Hernan Mejia Renteria ,&nbsp;Masahiro Hoshino ,&nbsp;Mauro Echavarria Pinto ,&nbsp;Martijn Meuwissen ,&nbsp;Hitoshi Matsuo ,&nbsp;Maribel Madera Cambero ,&nbsp;Ashkan Eftekhari ,&nbsp;Tadashi Murai ,&nbsp;Koen Marques ,&nbsp;Joon Hyung Doh ,&nbsp;Evald H. Christiansen ,&nbsp;Chang Wook Nam ,&nbsp;Rupak K. Banerjee\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijcard.2025.133864\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Pressure-based fractional flow reserve (FFR) and flow-based coronary flow reserve (CFR) assess the functional status of coronary artery disease (CAD) during cardiac catheterization. Complex hemodynamics may not be adequately explained by either pressure or flow alone. Consequently, pressure-drop coefficient (CDP, the ratio between pressure-drop across a stenosis and distal dynamic pressure) that combines both pressure and flow measurements has been developed to distinguish between epicardial stenosis (ES) and microvascular disease (MVD).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A global multicenter ILIAS registry was used to analyze CDP in relation to FFR/CFR among 961 subjects for 1342 intracoronary pressure and flow measurements. The correlation between FFR and CFR with CDP was analyzed. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the CDP cut-off value, corresponding to FFR = 0.80 and 0.75 and CFR = 2.0.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Both linear (<em>r</em> = 0.68) and logarithmic (<em>r</em> = 0.75) correlation of CDP with combined FFR and CFR improved (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) in relation to either FFR or CFR individually. The CDP cut-off values to predict the four possible disease combinations based on FFR(0.8) and CFR(2.0) are: 1) 0 to 15.78 (absence of both diseases); 2) 15.78 to 27.25 (absence of ES and presence of MVD); 3) 27.25 to 73.77 (presence of ES and absence of MVD); and 4) CDP ≥ 73.77 (presence of both diseases). Similar CDP cut-off ranges were obtained for FFR = 0.75 and CFR = 2.0.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The established diagnostic cut-off values of CDP can differentiate between the concomitant ES and MVD, improving the functional assessment of CAD.</div></div><div><h3>Condensed abstract</h3><div>Fractional flow reserve and coronary flow reserve assess the functional status of coronary artery disease (CAD) during cardiac catheterization, but the complex hemodynamics may not be adequately explained by either parameter alone. Pressure-drop coefficient (CDP) is a novel composite parameter that combines both pressure and flow measurements to delineate between epicardial stenosis (ES) and microvascular disease (MVD). ILIAS registry was used to analyze the diagnostic performance of CDP relative to FFR/CFR. The receiver operating characteristic curve was used to determine the CDP cut-off values, that delineate the various combinations of ES and MVD; hence, improving the functional assessment of CAD.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13710,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of cardiology\",\"volume\":\"442 \",\"pages\":\"Article 133864\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167527325009076\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167527325009076","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于压力的分数血流储备(FFR)和基于流量的冠状动脉血流储备(CFR)评估心导管置入术中冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的功能状态。复杂的血流动力学可能不能充分解释压力或流量单独。因此,结合压力和流量测量的压降系数(CDP,狭窄处压降与远端动压之比)已被开发出来,用于区分心外膜狭窄(ES)和微血管疾病(MVD)。方法采用全球多中心ILIAS注册表,分析961例受试者1342例冠状动脉内压力和血流测量中CDP与FFR/CFR的关系。分析FFR、CFR与CDP的相关性。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线确定CDP截止值,对应FFR = 0.80和0.75,CFR = 2.0。结果与单独的FFR或CFR相比,CDP与联合FFR和CFR的线性(r = 0.68)和对数(r = 0.75)相关性均得到改善(p < 0.001)。基于FFR(0.8)和CFR(2.0)预测四种可能的疾病组合的CDP临界值为:1)0 ~ 15.78(无两种疾病);2) 15.78 ~ 27.25 (ES缺失和MVD存在);3) ES存在和MVD不存在(27.25 ~ 73.77);4) CDP≥73.77(两种疾病均存在)。当FFR = 0.75和CFR = 2.0时,获得相似的CDP截止范围。结论建立的CDP诊断临界值可以区分并发ES和MVD,提高对CAD功能的评价。摘要分流血流储备和冠状动脉血流储备评价心导管术中冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的功能状态,但复杂的血流动力学可能不能单独用任何一个参数来充分解释。压降系数(CDP)是一种结合压力和流量测量来描述心外膜狭窄(ES)和微血管疾病(MVD)之间的新型复合参数。采用ILIAS注册表分析CDP相对于FFR/CFR的诊断性能。使用受试者工作特征曲线确定CDP截止值,该截止值描绘了ES和MVD的各种组合;从而改进CAD的功能评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Delineating coronary epicardial stenosis status from microvascular dysfunction using pressure-drop coefficient from multicenter ILIAS registry

Introduction

Pressure-based fractional flow reserve (FFR) and flow-based coronary flow reserve (CFR) assess the functional status of coronary artery disease (CAD) during cardiac catheterization. Complex hemodynamics may not be adequately explained by either pressure or flow alone. Consequently, pressure-drop coefficient (CDP, the ratio between pressure-drop across a stenosis and distal dynamic pressure) that combines both pressure and flow measurements has been developed to distinguish between epicardial stenosis (ES) and microvascular disease (MVD).

Methods

A global multicenter ILIAS registry was used to analyze CDP in relation to FFR/CFR among 961 subjects for 1342 intracoronary pressure and flow measurements. The correlation between FFR and CFR with CDP was analyzed. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the CDP cut-off value, corresponding to FFR = 0.80 and 0.75 and CFR = 2.0.

Results

Both linear (r = 0.68) and logarithmic (r = 0.75) correlation of CDP with combined FFR and CFR improved (p < 0.001) in relation to either FFR or CFR individually. The CDP cut-off values to predict the four possible disease combinations based on FFR(0.8) and CFR(2.0) are: 1) 0 to 15.78 (absence of both diseases); 2) 15.78 to 27.25 (absence of ES and presence of MVD); 3) 27.25 to 73.77 (presence of ES and absence of MVD); and 4) CDP ≥ 73.77 (presence of both diseases). Similar CDP cut-off ranges were obtained for FFR = 0.75 and CFR = 2.0.

Conclusion

The established diagnostic cut-off values of CDP can differentiate between the concomitant ES and MVD, improving the functional assessment of CAD.

Condensed abstract

Fractional flow reserve and coronary flow reserve assess the functional status of coronary artery disease (CAD) during cardiac catheterization, but the complex hemodynamics may not be adequately explained by either parameter alone. Pressure-drop coefficient (CDP) is a novel composite parameter that combines both pressure and flow measurements to delineate between epicardial stenosis (ES) and microvascular disease (MVD). ILIAS registry was used to analyze the diagnostic performance of CDP relative to FFR/CFR. The receiver operating characteristic curve was used to determine the CDP cut-off values, that delineate the various combinations of ES and MVD; hence, improving the functional assessment of CAD.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of cardiology
International journal of cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
5.70%
发文量
758
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Cardiology is devoted to cardiology in the broadest sense. Both basic research and clinical papers can be submitted. The journal serves the interest of both practicing clinicians and researchers. In addition to original papers, we are launching a range of new manuscript types, including Consensus and Position Papers, Systematic Reviews, Meta-analyses, and Short communications. Case reports are no longer acceptable. Controversial techniques, issues on health policy and social medicine are discussed and serve as useful tools for encouraging debate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信