亚热带植被林分结构特征与碳储量估算的尺度效应——以浙江省为例

IF 2.9 Q1 FORESTRY
Huawei Wu , Huiru Lv , Guozhong Wang , Tingxiu Liu , Wu Chen , Yufeng Zhou , Yongjun Shi
{"title":"亚热带植被林分结构特征与碳储量估算的尺度效应——以浙江省为例","authors":"Huawei Wu ,&nbsp;Huiru Lv ,&nbsp;Guozhong Wang ,&nbsp;Tingxiu Liu ,&nbsp;Wu Chen ,&nbsp;Yufeng Zhou ,&nbsp;Yongjun Shi","doi":"10.1016/j.tfp.2025.100988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In subtropical forest resource inventories, the plot-based sampling method is the primary approach for obtaining stand-structure and carbon-stock information. However, for different forest types, there is still no clear consensus on how to select an optimal plot size that balances survey effort with data precision. This study addressed this gap by establishing fixed sample plots of 400 m², 225 m², and 100 m² within four representative forest types in Zhejiang Province, China: evergreen broadleaved forest (EBF), deciduous broadleaved forest (DBF), conifer-broadleaf mixed forest (CBMF), and coniferous forest (CF). We conducted field measurements of structural metrics including stand volume, mixing degree, aggregation index and competition index, as well as tree carbon stock and soil organic carbon stock. The coefficients of variation of each index and the minimum number of sample plots were calculated at different land scales. Our results indicate that different types of subtropical forests exhibit distinct community structural characteristics, leading to significant differences in their sensitivity to reductions in plot size. In CF, a reduced plot size of 100 m² effectively lowers survey costs while maintaining acceptable estimation accuracy for tree carbon stocks. As forest types approach the climax subtropical community, a significant positive correlation emerges between stand mixing degree and tree carbon stock; however, reducing plot size tends to underestimate the strength of this relationship. The results of this study provide a scientific basis for optimizing plot size selection in forest resource surveys of different forest types in subtropical regions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36104,"journal":{"name":"Trees, Forests and People","volume":"22 ","pages":"Article 100988"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scaling effects of stand structure characteristics and carbon stock estimation in subtropical vegetation: An example from Zhejiang Province, China\",\"authors\":\"Huawei Wu ,&nbsp;Huiru Lv ,&nbsp;Guozhong Wang ,&nbsp;Tingxiu Liu ,&nbsp;Wu Chen ,&nbsp;Yufeng Zhou ,&nbsp;Yongjun Shi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tfp.2025.100988\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In subtropical forest resource inventories, the plot-based sampling method is the primary approach for obtaining stand-structure and carbon-stock information. However, for different forest types, there is still no clear consensus on how to select an optimal plot size that balances survey effort with data precision. This study addressed this gap by establishing fixed sample plots of 400 m², 225 m², and 100 m² within four representative forest types in Zhejiang Province, China: evergreen broadleaved forest (EBF), deciduous broadleaved forest (DBF), conifer-broadleaf mixed forest (CBMF), and coniferous forest (CF). We conducted field measurements of structural metrics including stand volume, mixing degree, aggregation index and competition index, as well as tree carbon stock and soil organic carbon stock. The coefficients of variation of each index and the minimum number of sample plots were calculated at different land scales. Our results indicate that different types of subtropical forests exhibit distinct community structural characteristics, leading to significant differences in their sensitivity to reductions in plot size. In CF, a reduced plot size of 100 m² effectively lowers survey costs while maintaining acceptable estimation accuracy for tree carbon stocks. As forest types approach the climax subtropical community, a significant positive correlation emerges between stand mixing degree and tree carbon stock; however, reducing plot size tends to underestimate the strength of this relationship. The results of this study provide a scientific basis for optimizing plot size selection in forest resource surveys of different forest types in subtropical regions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36104,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trees, Forests and People\",\"volume\":\"22 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100988\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trees, Forests and People\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666719325002146\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trees, Forests and People","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666719325002146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在亚热带森林资源调查中,样地采样法是获取林分结构和碳储量信息的主要方法。然而,对于不同的森林类型,如何选择一个最优的样地大小来平衡调查工作和数据精度,仍然没有明确的共识。本文通过在浙江省常绿阔叶林(EBF)、落叶阔叶林(DBF)、针叶阔叶混交林(CBMF)和针叶林(CF) 4种典型森林类型中分别建立400 m²、225 m²和100 m²的固定样地,弥补了这一空白。对林分体积、混合度、聚集指数和竞争指数、树木碳储量和土壤有机碳储量等结构指标进行了野外测量。计算了不同土地尺度下各指标的变异系数和最小样地数。结果表明,不同类型的亚热带森林表现出不同的群落结构特征,导致其对样地面积减少的敏感性存在显著差异。在CF中,减少100平方米的地块面积有效地降低了调查成本,同时保持了树木碳储量的可接受估计精度。当森林类型接近亚热带顶极群落时,林分混交度与林木碳储量呈显著正相关;然而,减小地块面积往往会低估这种关系的强度。研究结果为亚热带不同森林类型森林资源调查中样地大小的优化选择提供了科学依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Scaling effects of stand structure characteristics and carbon stock estimation in subtropical vegetation: An example from Zhejiang Province, China
In subtropical forest resource inventories, the plot-based sampling method is the primary approach for obtaining stand-structure and carbon-stock information. However, for different forest types, there is still no clear consensus on how to select an optimal plot size that balances survey effort with data precision. This study addressed this gap by establishing fixed sample plots of 400 m², 225 m², and 100 m² within four representative forest types in Zhejiang Province, China: evergreen broadleaved forest (EBF), deciduous broadleaved forest (DBF), conifer-broadleaf mixed forest (CBMF), and coniferous forest (CF). We conducted field measurements of structural metrics including stand volume, mixing degree, aggregation index and competition index, as well as tree carbon stock and soil organic carbon stock. The coefficients of variation of each index and the minimum number of sample plots were calculated at different land scales. Our results indicate that different types of subtropical forests exhibit distinct community structural characteristics, leading to significant differences in their sensitivity to reductions in plot size. In CF, a reduced plot size of 100 m² effectively lowers survey costs while maintaining acceptable estimation accuracy for tree carbon stocks. As forest types approach the climax subtropical community, a significant positive correlation emerges between stand mixing degree and tree carbon stock; however, reducing plot size tends to underestimate the strength of this relationship. The results of this study provide a scientific basis for optimizing plot size selection in forest resource surveys of different forest types in subtropical regions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Trees, Forests and People
Trees, Forests and People Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.40%
发文量
172
审稿时长
56 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信