秸秆还田方式对不同退化程度软土土壤水分和储水量季节变化的影响

IF 6.5 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Shukun Xing , Guanghui Zhang , Ning Zhang , Yatong Zhang , Yi Zhang
{"title":"秸秆还田方式对不同退化程度软土土壤水分和储水量季节变化的影响","authors":"Shukun Xing ,&nbsp;Guanghui Zhang ,&nbsp;Ning Zhang ,&nbsp;Yatong Zhang ,&nbsp;Yi Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Straw return has been widely implemented to mitigate soil erosion in agricultural land. However, the influences of straw returning method on soil moisture dynamics and water storage capacity in croplands with varying degradation degrees remain unclear. To address these knowledge gaps, seasonal variations in soil moisture and water storage in 0–100 cm soil layer were monitored throughout the soybean growing season (2023) in the black soil region of northeastern China. Four straw returning methods, namely rotary tillage (SR), deep plowing (SP), strip mulching (SM) and straw removal (CK), were evaluated across croplands with four degradation degrees: non-degradation (ND), light (LD), moderate (MD) and severe degradation (SD). The findings demonstrated that soil moisture changed greatly with soybean growth stages, especially for SP and CK treatments, with coefficients of variation ranged from 1.3 % to 18.8 % and from 0.7 % to 15.8 %. With land degradation degree intensifying, 0–60 cm soil water storage decreased from 220.2 mm to 152.4 mm. Compared to CK, soil water storage (0–60 cm) increased by 2.8–10.6 %, −5.0–3.8 %, and 15.0–19.3 % for SR, SP and SM treatments, respectively. SR method was recommended for non-degraded cropland, whereas SM method should be applied for degraded croplands. The mechanisms of straw returning method regulating soil water storage were primarily related to the resultant changes in soil porosity, temperature, and the capacity to capture rainfall. This study provides valuable insights for choosing the appropriate straw management practice to promote rainfall use efficiency in sloping farmlands, particularly in semi-humid regions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7634,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Water Management","volume":"319 ","pages":"Article 109796"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of straw returning methods on seasonal variation in soil moisture and water storage in Mollisols with different degradation degrees\",\"authors\":\"Shukun Xing ,&nbsp;Guanghui Zhang ,&nbsp;Ning Zhang ,&nbsp;Yatong Zhang ,&nbsp;Yi Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109796\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Straw return has been widely implemented to mitigate soil erosion in agricultural land. However, the influences of straw returning method on soil moisture dynamics and water storage capacity in croplands with varying degradation degrees remain unclear. To address these knowledge gaps, seasonal variations in soil moisture and water storage in 0–100 cm soil layer were monitored throughout the soybean growing season (2023) in the black soil region of northeastern China. Four straw returning methods, namely rotary tillage (SR), deep plowing (SP), strip mulching (SM) and straw removal (CK), were evaluated across croplands with four degradation degrees: non-degradation (ND), light (LD), moderate (MD) and severe degradation (SD). The findings demonstrated that soil moisture changed greatly with soybean growth stages, especially for SP and CK treatments, with coefficients of variation ranged from 1.3 % to 18.8 % and from 0.7 % to 15.8 %. With land degradation degree intensifying, 0–60 cm soil water storage decreased from 220.2 mm to 152.4 mm. Compared to CK, soil water storage (0–60 cm) increased by 2.8–10.6 %, −5.0–3.8 %, and 15.0–19.3 % for SR, SP and SM treatments, respectively. SR method was recommended for non-degraded cropland, whereas SM method should be applied for degraded croplands. The mechanisms of straw returning method regulating soil water storage were primarily related to the resultant changes in soil porosity, temperature, and the capacity to capture rainfall. This study provides valuable insights for choosing the appropriate straw management practice to promote rainfall use efficiency in sloping farmlands, particularly in semi-humid regions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7634,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agricultural Water Management\",\"volume\":\"319 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109796\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agricultural Water Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377425005104\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Water Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377425005104","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

秸秆还田是缓解农田土壤侵蚀的一种有效措施。但秸秆还田方式对不同退化程度农田土壤水分动态和蓄水能力的影响尚不清楚。为了解决这些知识空白,在中国东北黑土地区监测了整个大豆生长季节(2023年)0-100 cm土层土壤水分和储水量的季节变化。以不降解(ND)、轻度(LD)、中度(MD)和重度降解(SD) 4种退化程度的农田为研究对象,对旋耕法(SR)、深耕法(SP)、地膜法(SM)和秸秆还田(CK) 4种秸秆还田方式进行了评价。结果表明,土壤水分随大豆生育期变化较大,特别是SP和CK处理,变异系数分别为1.3 % ~ 18.8 %和0.7 % ~ 15.8 %。随着土地退化程度的加剧,0 ~ 60 cm土壤储水量从220.2 mm减少到152.4 mm。与对照相比,SR、SP和SM处理0 ~ 60 cm土壤储水量分别增加2.8 ~ 10.6 %、−5.0 ~ 3.8 %和15.0 ~ 19.3 %。对于未退化的农田,建议采用SR法,而对于退化的农田,建议采用SM法。秸秆还田调节土壤水分储存的机制主要与土壤孔隙度、温度和蓄雨能力的变化有关。该研究为选择适当的秸秆管理措施以提高坡耕地,特别是半湿润地区的降雨利用效率提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of straw returning methods on seasonal variation in soil moisture and water storage in Mollisols with different degradation degrees
Straw return has been widely implemented to mitigate soil erosion in agricultural land. However, the influences of straw returning method on soil moisture dynamics and water storage capacity in croplands with varying degradation degrees remain unclear. To address these knowledge gaps, seasonal variations in soil moisture and water storage in 0–100 cm soil layer were monitored throughout the soybean growing season (2023) in the black soil region of northeastern China. Four straw returning methods, namely rotary tillage (SR), deep plowing (SP), strip mulching (SM) and straw removal (CK), were evaluated across croplands with four degradation degrees: non-degradation (ND), light (LD), moderate (MD) and severe degradation (SD). The findings demonstrated that soil moisture changed greatly with soybean growth stages, especially for SP and CK treatments, with coefficients of variation ranged from 1.3 % to 18.8 % and from 0.7 % to 15.8 %. With land degradation degree intensifying, 0–60 cm soil water storage decreased from 220.2 mm to 152.4 mm. Compared to CK, soil water storage (0–60 cm) increased by 2.8–10.6 %, −5.0–3.8 %, and 15.0–19.3 % for SR, SP and SM treatments, respectively. SR method was recommended for non-degraded cropland, whereas SM method should be applied for degraded croplands. The mechanisms of straw returning method regulating soil water storage were primarily related to the resultant changes in soil porosity, temperature, and the capacity to capture rainfall. This study provides valuable insights for choosing the appropriate straw management practice to promote rainfall use efficiency in sloping farmlands, particularly in semi-humid regions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Agricultural Water Management
Agricultural Water Management 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
14.90%
发文量
648
审稿时长
4.9 months
期刊介绍: Agricultural Water Management publishes papers of international significance relating to the science, economics, and policy of agricultural water management. In all cases, manuscripts must address implications and provide insight regarding agricultural water management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信