Shukun Xing , Guanghui Zhang , Ning Zhang , Yatong Zhang , Yi Zhang
{"title":"秸秆还田方式对不同退化程度软土土壤水分和储水量季节变化的影响","authors":"Shukun Xing , Guanghui Zhang , Ning Zhang , Yatong Zhang , Yi Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Straw return has been widely implemented to mitigate soil erosion in agricultural land. However, the influences of straw returning method on soil moisture dynamics and water storage capacity in croplands with varying degradation degrees remain unclear. To address these knowledge gaps, seasonal variations in soil moisture and water storage in 0–100 cm soil layer were monitored throughout the soybean growing season (2023) in the black soil region of northeastern China. Four straw returning methods, namely rotary tillage (SR), deep plowing (SP), strip mulching (SM) and straw removal (CK), were evaluated across croplands with four degradation degrees: non-degradation (ND), light (LD), moderate (MD) and severe degradation (SD). The findings demonstrated that soil moisture changed greatly with soybean growth stages, especially for SP and CK treatments, with coefficients of variation ranged from 1.3 % to 18.8 % and from 0.7 % to 15.8 %. With land degradation degree intensifying, 0–60 cm soil water storage decreased from 220.2 mm to 152.4 mm. Compared to CK, soil water storage (0–60 cm) increased by 2.8–10.6 %, −5.0–3.8 %, and 15.0–19.3 % for SR, SP and SM treatments, respectively. SR method was recommended for non-degraded cropland, whereas SM method should be applied for degraded croplands. The mechanisms of straw returning method regulating soil water storage were primarily related to the resultant changes in soil porosity, temperature, and the capacity to capture rainfall. This study provides valuable insights for choosing the appropriate straw management practice to promote rainfall use efficiency in sloping farmlands, particularly in semi-humid regions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7634,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Water Management","volume":"319 ","pages":"Article 109796"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of straw returning methods on seasonal variation in soil moisture and water storage in Mollisols with different degradation degrees\",\"authors\":\"Shukun Xing , Guanghui Zhang , Ning Zhang , Yatong Zhang , Yi Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109796\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Straw return has been widely implemented to mitigate soil erosion in agricultural land. However, the influences of straw returning method on soil moisture dynamics and water storage capacity in croplands with varying degradation degrees remain unclear. To address these knowledge gaps, seasonal variations in soil moisture and water storage in 0–100 cm soil layer were monitored throughout the soybean growing season (2023) in the black soil region of northeastern China. Four straw returning methods, namely rotary tillage (SR), deep plowing (SP), strip mulching (SM) and straw removal (CK), were evaluated across croplands with four degradation degrees: non-degradation (ND), light (LD), moderate (MD) and severe degradation (SD). The findings demonstrated that soil moisture changed greatly with soybean growth stages, especially for SP and CK treatments, with coefficients of variation ranged from 1.3 % to 18.8 % and from 0.7 % to 15.8 %. With land degradation degree intensifying, 0–60 cm soil water storage decreased from 220.2 mm to 152.4 mm. Compared to CK, soil water storage (0–60 cm) increased by 2.8–10.6 %, −5.0–3.8 %, and 15.0–19.3 % for SR, SP and SM treatments, respectively. SR method was recommended for non-degraded cropland, whereas SM method should be applied for degraded croplands. The mechanisms of straw returning method regulating soil water storage were primarily related to the resultant changes in soil porosity, temperature, and the capacity to capture rainfall. This study provides valuable insights for choosing the appropriate straw management practice to promote rainfall use efficiency in sloping farmlands, particularly in semi-humid regions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7634,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agricultural Water Management\",\"volume\":\"319 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109796\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agricultural Water Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377425005104\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Water Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377425005104","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effects of straw returning methods on seasonal variation in soil moisture and water storage in Mollisols with different degradation degrees
Straw return has been widely implemented to mitigate soil erosion in agricultural land. However, the influences of straw returning method on soil moisture dynamics and water storage capacity in croplands with varying degradation degrees remain unclear. To address these knowledge gaps, seasonal variations in soil moisture and water storage in 0–100 cm soil layer were monitored throughout the soybean growing season (2023) in the black soil region of northeastern China. Four straw returning methods, namely rotary tillage (SR), deep plowing (SP), strip mulching (SM) and straw removal (CK), were evaluated across croplands with four degradation degrees: non-degradation (ND), light (LD), moderate (MD) and severe degradation (SD). The findings demonstrated that soil moisture changed greatly with soybean growth stages, especially for SP and CK treatments, with coefficients of variation ranged from 1.3 % to 18.8 % and from 0.7 % to 15.8 %. With land degradation degree intensifying, 0–60 cm soil water storage decreased from 220.2 mm to 152.4 mm. Compared to CK, soil water storage (0–60 cm) increased by 2.8–10.6 %, −5.0–3.8 %, and 15.0–19.3 % for SR, SP and SM treatments, respectively. SR method was recommended for non-degraded cropland, whereas SM method should be applied for degraded croplands. The mechanisms of straw returning method regulating soil water storage were primarily related to the resultant changes in soil porosity, temperature, and the capacity to capture rainfall. This study provides valuable insights for choosing the appropriate straw management practice to promote rainfall use efficiency in sloping farmlands, particularly in semi-humid regions.
期刊介绍:
Agricultural Water Management publishes papers of international significance relating to the science, economics, and policy of agricultural water management. In all cases, manuscripts must address implications and provide insight regarding agricultural water management.