Jingkang Zhang , Xingjie Wang , Liyuan Ma , Yao Fu , Peng Liu , Hongmei Wang , Jianwei Zhou
{"title":"人工湿地处理酸性矿山废水中金属去除效率的关键操作参数:一种可解释的机器学习方法","authors":"Jingkang Zhang , Xingjie Wang , Liyuan Ma , Yao Fu , Peng Liu , Hongmei Wang , Jianwei Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.psep.2025.107850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Constructed wetlands have long been recognized as a sustainable, effective and economical approach for treating acid mine drainage (AMD). The varying components of AMD at different locations impose significant site-specific constraints on the construction and maintenance of these wetlands. Herein, machine learning (ML) was utilized to predict and analyze multi-metal removal efficiencies, and address the complex interactions in constructed wetlands. Five ML models were developed, among which the XGBoost model achieved high apparent accuracy (<em>R</em><sup><em>2</em></sup> > 0.8) for the removal efficiency of total iron, manganese, aluminum and zinc in the main pipeline. While model performance generally declined (<em>R</em><sup><em>2</em></sup> decreased by approximately 0.2 overall) under leakage-safe out-of-fold evaluation and forward-chaining time-series tests with naive baselines, tree-based models remained dominant, providing conservative estimates. Detailed feature and sensitivity analyses identified operation Days and inflow Chemical Oxygen Demand as significant predictors of metal removal efficiency. Furthermore, the empirical categories for metal removal, ranked by importance, were inflow parameters in first place, followed by time series, and wetland properties in last place. Partial dependence plots revealed certain ranges of the significant predictors and systematically illustrated their interactions and contributions to the metal removal efficiencies. These findings support near-real-time monitoring and short-horizon operational decisions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20743,"journal":{"name":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","volume":"202 ","pages":"Article 107850"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Critical operational parameters for metal removal efficiency in acid mine drainage treated by constructed wetlands: An explainable machine learning approach\",\"authors\":\"Jingkang Zhang , Xingjie Wang , Liyuan Ma , Yao Fu , Peng Liu , Hongmei Wang , Jianwei Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.psep.2025.107850\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Constructed wetlands have long been recognized as a sustainable, effective and economical approach for treating acid mine drainage (AMD). The varying components of AMD at different locations impose significant site-specific constraints on the construction and maintenance of these wetlands. Herein, machine learning (ML) was utilized to predict and analyze multi-metal removal efficiencies, and address the complex interactions in constructed wetlands. Five ML models were developed, among which the XGBoost model achieved high apparent accuracy (<em>R</em><sup><em>2</em></sup> > 0.8) for the removal efficiency of total iron, manganese, aluminum and zinc in the main pipeline. While model performance generally declined (<em>R</em><sup><em>2</em></sup> decreased by approximately 0.2 overall) under leakage-safe out-of-fold evaluation and forward-chaining time-series tests with naive baselines, tree-based models remained dominant, providing conservative estimates. Detailed feature and sensitivity analyses identified operation Days and inflow Chemical Oxygen Demand as significant predictors of metal removal efficiency. Furthermore, the empirical categories for metal removal, ranked by importance, were inflow parameters in first place, followed by time series, and wetland properties in last place. Partial dependence plots revealed certain ranges of the significant predictors and systematically illustrated their interactions and contributions to the metal removal efficiencies. These findings support near-real-time monitoring and short-horizon operational decisions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20743,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Process Safety and Environmental Protection\",\"volume\":\"202 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107850\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Process Safety and Environmental Protection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957582025011176\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957582025011176","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Critical operational parameters for metal removal efficiency in acid mine drainage treated by constructed wetlands: An explainable machine learning approach
Constructed wetlands have long been recognized as a sustainable, effective and economical approach for treating acid mine drainage (AMD). The varying components of AMD at different locations impose significant site-specific constraints on the construction and maintenance of these wetlands. Herein, machine learning (ML) was utilized to predict and analyze multi-metal removal efficiencies, and address the complex interactions in constructed wetlands. Five ML models were developed, among which the XGBoost model achieved high apparent accuracy (R2 > 0.8) for the removal efficiency of total iron, manganese, aluminum and zinc in the main pipeline. While model performance generally declined (R2 decreased by approximately 0.2 overall) under leakage-safe out-of-fold evaluation and forward-chaining time-series tests with naive baselines, tree-based models remained dominant, providing conservative estimates. Detailed feature and sensitivity analyses identified operation Days and inflow Chemical Oxygen Demand as significant predictors of metal removal efficiency. Furthermore, the empirical categories for metal removal, ranked by importance, were inflow parameters in first place, followed by time series, and wetland properties in last place. Partial dependence plots revealed certain ranges of the significant predictors and systematically illustrated their interactions and contributions to the metal removal efficiencies. These findings support near-real-time monitoring and short-horizon operational decisions.
期刊介绍:
The Process Safety and Environmental Protection (PSEP) journal is a leading international publication that focuses on the publication of high-quality, original research papers in the field of engineering, specifically those related to the safety of industrial processes and environmental protection. The journal encourages submissions that present new developments in safety and environmental aspects, particularly those that show how research findings can be applied in process engineering design and practice.
PSEP is particularly interested in research that brings fresh perspectives to established engineering principles, identifies unsolved problems, or suggests directions for future research. The journal also values contributions that push the boundaries of traditional engineering and welcomes multidisciplinary papers.
PSEP's articles are abstracted and indexed by a range of databases and services, which helps to ensure that the journal's research is accessible and recognized in the academic and professional communities. These databases include ANTE, Chemical Abstracts, Chemical Hazards in Industry, Current Contents, Elsevier Engineering Information database, Pascal Francis, Web of Science, Scopus, Engineering Information Database EnCompass LIT (Elsevier), and INSPEC. This wide coverage facilitates the dissemination of the journal's content to a global audience interested in process safety and environmental engineering.