对等,因果关系和文化进化

IF 3.2 1区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Pat Barclay, Oliver Twardus
{"title":"对等,因果关系和文化进化","authors":"Pat Barclay,&nbsp;Oliver Twardus","doi":"10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2025.106755","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><span><span>Baumard and André's (2025)</span></span> ecological approach presents a compelling perspective on cultural evolution. Although it may appear as an alternative to Dual Inheritance Theory, we argue that these theories need not be in opposition to one another. If anything, the ecological approach may have greater causal validity – although future research is necessary to determine whether this is the case.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55159,"journal":{"name":"Evolution and Human Behavior","volume":"46 6","pages":"Article 106755"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Equivalence, causality, and cultural evolution\",\"authors\":\"Pat Barclay,&nbsp;Oliver Twardus\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2025.106755\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div><span><span>Baumard and André's (2025)</span></span> ecological approach presents a compelling perspective on cultural evolution. Although it may appear as an alternative to Dual Inheritance Theory, we argue that these theories need not be in opposition to one another. If anything, the ecological approach may have greater causal validity – although future research is necessary to determine whether this is the case.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evolution and Human Behavior\",\"volume\":\"46 6\",\"pages\":\"Article 106755\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evolution and Human Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513825001047\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evolution and Human Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513825001047","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Baumard和andr(2025)的生态方法提出了一个令人信服的文化进化视角。虽然它可能看起来是双重继承理论的另一种选择,但我们认为这些理论不一定是相互对立的。如果有的话,生态学方法可能有更大的因果有效性——尽管需要未来的研究来确定情况是否如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Equivalence, causality, and cultural evolution
Baumard and André's (2025) ecological approach presents a compelling perspective on cultural evolution. Although it may appear as an alternative to Dual Inheritance Theory, we argue that these theories need not be in opposition to one another. If anything, the ecological approach may have greater causal validity – although future research is necessary to determine whether this is the case.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Evolution and Human Behavior
Evolution and Human Behavior 生物-行为科学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
9.80%
发文量
62
审稿时长
82 days
期刊介绍: Evolution and Human Behavior is an interdisciplinary journal, presenting research reports and theory in which evolutionary perspectives are brought to bear on the study of human behavior. It is primarily a scientific journal, but submissions from scholars in the humanities are also encouraged. Papers reporting on theoretical and empirical work on other species will be welcome if their relevance to the human animal is apparent.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信