海礁海洋政策的机遇与障碍:自然资本核算的回顾与作用

IF 5.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 OCEANOGRAPHY
Yuqing Chen , Nicholas Conner , Dahai Liu , Michael Vardon
{"title":"海礁海洋政策的机遇与障碍:自然资本核算的回顾与作用","authors":"Yuqing Chen ,&nbsp;Nicholas Conner ,&nbsp;Dahai Liu ,&nbsp;Michael Vardon","doi":"10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2025.107912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Ridge-to-reef (R2R) is a framework for managing connected terrestrial, coastal, and marine ecosystems. Natural capital accounting, standardised internationally in the System of Environmental-Economic Accounting (SEEA), integrates environmental and economic data, allowing decision-makers to assess trade-offs within and between environmental and economic objectives. The study aims to investigate the opportunities and barriers to incorporating R2R into marine policy and management and the potential of SEEA to address these barriers. We reviewed 49 R2R studies and identified two opportunities (integrated thinking and integrated management options) and three barriers (geographical bias in R2R literature, lack of standardisation, and limited policy uptake). Following the review, we aligned R2R with SEEA to investigate how it could address the barriers. We found that the SEEA addresses the barriers of standardisation and limited policy uptake by providing a standardised framework and metrics for policy-relevant information across terrestrial and marine environments, enabling the identification of upstream impacts on downstream ecosystems, cross-institutional coordination, and integration of R2R into national planning. Moreover, SEEA accounts provide the information needed to manage human impacts on coastal and marine ecosystems adaptively. This includes information for analyses to select the best management practices and to judge the effectiveness of management activity for maintaining ecosystem condition and ecosystem services. We conclude that it is feasible and useful to integrate SEEA to address R2R barriers, and the advantages of incorporating R2R into existing marine policies warrant further investigation. The next step is to test our conclusions through case studies that represent the broad range of social, ecological and economic circumstances in which R2R could be applied. From the case studies and the broader literature, best practices for using SEEA in R2R in marine management can be determined. Ultimately, this enables evidence-based and integrated management that fully addresses upstream impacts on downstream ecosystems for more effective and sustainable marine policies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54698,"journal":{"name":"Ocean & Coastal Management","volume":"270 ","pages":"Article 107912"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Opportunities and barriers to ridge-to-reef marine policy: A review and the role of natural capital accounting\",\"authors\":\"Yuqing Chen ,&nbsp;Nicholas Conner ,&nbsp;Dahai Liu ,&nbsp;Michael Vardon\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2025.107912\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Ridge-to-reef (R2R) is a framework for managing connected terrestrial, coastal, and marine ecosystems. Natural capital accounting, standardised internationally in the System of Environmental-Economic Accounting (SEEA), integrates environmental and economic data, allowing decision-makers to assess trade-offs within and between environmental and economic objectives. The study aims to investigate the opportunities and barriers to incorporating R2R into marine policy and management and the potential of SEEA to address these barriers. We reviewed 49 R2R studies and identified two opportunities (integrated thinking and integrated management options) and three barriers (geographical bias in R2R literature, lack of standardisation, and limited policy uptake). Following the review, we aligned R2R with SEEA to investigate how it could address the barriers. We found that the SEEA addresses the barriers of standardisation and limited policy uptake by providing a standardised framework and metrics for policy-relevant information across terrestrial and marine environments, enabling the identification of upstream impacts on downstream ecosystems, cross-institutional coordination, and integration of R2R into national planning. Moreover, SEEA accounts provide the information needed to manage human impacts on coastal and marine ecosystems adaptively. This includes information for analyses to select the best management practices and to judge the effectiveness of management activity for maintaining ecosystem condition and ecosystem services. We conclude that it is feasible and useful to integrate SEEA to address R2R barriers, and the advantages of incorporating R2R into existing marine policies warrant further investigation. The next step is to test our conclusions through case studies that represent the broad range of social, ecological and economic circumstances in which R2R could be applied. From the case studies and the broader literature, best practices for using SEEA in R2R in marine management can be determined. Ultimately, this enables evidence-based and integrated management that fully addresses upstream impacts on downstream ecosystems for more effective and sustainable marine policies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54698,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ocean & Coastal Management\",\"volume\":\"270 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107912\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ocean & Coastal Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964569125003746\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OCEANOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocean & Coastal Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964569125003746","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OCEANOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

脊礁(R2R)是一个管理陆地、沿海和海洋生态系统的框架。自然资本核算在环境经济核算体系(SEEA)中得到了国际标准化,它综合了环境和经济数据,使决策者能够评估环境和经济目标内部和之间的权衡。该研究旨在调查将R2R纳入海洋政策和管理的机会和障碍,以及SEEA解决这些障碍的潜力。我们回顾了49项R2R研究,并确定了两个机会(综合思维和综合管理方案)和三个障碍(R2R文献的地理偏见、缺乏标准化和政策采纳有限)。在审查之后,我们将R2R与SEEA结合起来,研究如何解决这些障碍。我们发现,SEEA通过为陆地和海洋环境的政策相关信息提供标准化框架和指标,解决了标准化障碍和有限的政策采纳问题,使上游对下游生态系统的影响得以确定,跨机构协调,并将R2R纳入国家规划。此外,SEEA帐户提供了自适应管理人类对沿海和海洋生态系统影响所需的信息。这包括用于分析的信息,以选择最佳管理做法和判断维持生态系统条件和生态系统服务的管理活动的有效性。我们的结论是,整合SEEA来解决R2R障碍是可行和有用的,将R2R纳入现有海洋政策的优势值得进一步研究。下一步是通过案例研究来检验我们的结论,这些案例研究代表了R2R可以应用的广泛的社会、生态和经济环境。从案例研究和更广泛的文献中,可以确定在海洋管理的R2R中使用SEEA的最佳实践。最终,这将实现基于证据的综合管理,充分解决上游对下游生态系统的影响,从而实现更有效和可持续的海洋政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Opportunities and barriers to ridge-to-reef marine policy: A review and the role of natural capital accounting
Ridge-to-reef (R2R) is a framework for managing connected terrestrial, coastal, and marine ecosystems. Natural capital accounting, standardised internationally in the System of Environmental-Economic Accounting (SEEA), integrates environmental and economic data, allowing decision-makers to assess trade-offs within and between environmental and economic objectives. The study aims to investigate the opportunities and barriers to incorporating R2R into marine policy and management and the potential of SEEA to address these barriers. We reviewed 49 R2R studies and identified two opportunities (integrated thinking and integrated management options) and three barriers (geographical bias in R2R literature, lack of standardisation, and limited policy uptake). Following the review, we aligned R2R with SEEA to investigate how it could address the barriers. We found that the SEEA addresses the barriers of standardisation and limited policy uptake by providing a standardised framework and metrics for policy-relevant information across terrestrial and marine environments, enabling the identification of upstream impacts on downstream ecosystems, cross-institutional coordination, and integration of R2R into national planning. Moreover, SEEA accounts provide the information needed to manage human impacts on coastal and marine ecosystems adaptively. This includes information for analyses to select the best management practices and to judge the effectiveness of management activity for maintaining ecosystem condition and ecosystem services. We conclude that it is feasible and useful to integrate SEEA to address R2R barriers, and the advantages of incorporating R2R into existing marine policies warrant further investigation. The next step is to test our conclusions through case studies that represent the broad range of social, ecological and economic circumstances in which R2R could be applied. From the case studies and the broader literature, best practices for using SEEA in R2R in marine management can be determined. Ultimately, this enables evidence-based and integrated management that fully addresses upstream impacts on downstream ecosystems for more effective and sustainable marine policies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ocean & Coastal Management
Ocean & Coastal Management 环境科学-海洋学
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
15.20%
发文量
321
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Ocean & Coastal Management is the leading international journal dedicated to the study of all aspects of ocean and coastal management from the global to local levels. We publish rigorously peer-reviewed manuscripts from all disciplines, and inter-/trans-disciplinary and co-designed research, but all submissions must make clear the relevance to management and/or governance issues relevant to the sustainable development and conservation of oceans and coasts. Comparative studies (from sub-national to trans-national cases, and other management / policy arenas) are encouraged, as are studies that critically assess current management practices and governance approaches. Submissions involving robust analysis, development of theory, and improvement of management practice are especially welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信