Celia Bähr , David Phan , Natalia Murawska , Julia Gerber , Annie Jordan , Kyra Hoffmann , Claudia Calvano
{"title":"共同和超越:对儿童和青少年跨诊断心理治疗群体干预的特征和疗效的系统回顾","authors":"Celia Bähr , David Phan , Natalia Murawska , Julia Gerber , Annie Jordan , Kyra Hoffmann , Claudia Calvano","doi":"10.1016/j.cpr.2025.102642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Transdiagnostic group interventions address the limitations of youth mental health care services, including the disorder-specific nature of existing treatments and the limited capacity of individual psychotherapies. This review synthesizes the 1) characteristics, applications, parental involvement, patient and public involvement (PPI), and 2) data on efficacy, adherence, safety and treatment satisfaction evidence of transdiagnostic group interventions for children and adolescents. Following PRISMA guidelines, a preregistered systematic literature search identified 6845 publications on transdiagnostic in-person group-based interventions for children and adolescents (mean age ≤ 18 years). Two reviewers independently screened for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the RoB-2 and ROBINS-I tool. The review examined 80 studies encompassing 4152 participants (<em>M</em><sub>age =</sub> 12.81 years), mostly conducted in high-income countries. Cognitive behavioural therapy was the most commonly used approach (<em>κ</em> = 59), with the core components mindfulness, emotion regulation, and cognitive restructuring. Interventions averaged 11 sessions and 52 % involved parents. 22 studies targeted anxiety and depression jointly with positive pre-post effects. Significant reductions in symptom severity were also reported for other disorders, though outcome measures highly varied and group comparisons with active control conditions or treatment-as-usual were often non-significant. Few studies examined disorder-unspecific outcomes like psychosocial functioning, quality of life, or reported remission rates, treatment satisfaction or applied a PPI framework. While a large number of different transdiagnostic group interventions for youth have been developed and evaluated, the lack of rigorous reporting and high risk of bias highlight the need for better-quality research to strengthen evidence and improve clinical implementation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48458,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Review","volume":"121 ","pages":"Article 102642"},"PeriodicalIF":12.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Together and beyond: A systematic review on characteristics and efficacy of transdiagnostic psychotherapeutic group-based interventions for children and adolescents\",\"authors\":\"Celia Bähr , David Phan , Natalia Murawska , Julia Gerber , Annie Jordan , Kyra Hoffmann , Claudia Calvano\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cpr.2025.102642\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Transdiagnostic group interventions address the limitations of youth mental health care services, including the disorder-specific nature of existing treatments and the limited capacity of individual psychotherapies. This review synthesizes the 1) characteristics, applications, parental involvement, patient and public involvement (PPI), and 2) data on efficacy, adherence, safety and treatment satisfaction evidence of transdiagnostic group interventions for children and adolescents. Following PRISMA guidelines, a preregistered systematic literature search identified 6845 publications on transdiagnostic in-person group-based interventions for children and adolescents (mean age ≤ 18 years). Two reviewers independently screened for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the RoB-2 and ROBINS-I tool. The review examined 80 studies encompassing 4152 participants (<em>M</em><sub>age =</sub> 12.81 years), mostly conducted in high-income countries. Cognitive behavioural therapy was the most commonly used approach (<em>κ</em> = 59), with the core components mindfulness, emotion regulation, and cognitive restructuring. Interventions averaged 11 sessions and 52 % involved parents. 22 studies targeted anxiety and depression jointly with positive pre-post effects. Significant reductions in symptom severity were also reported for other disorders, though outcome measures highly varied and group comparisons with active control conditions or treatment-as-usual were often non-significant. Few studies examined disorder-unspecific outcomes like psychosocial functioning, quality of life, or reported remission rates, treatment satisfaction or applied a PPI framework. While a large number of different transdiagnostic group interventions for youth have been developed and evaluated, the lack of rigorous reporting and high risk of bias highlight the need for better-quality research to strengthen evidence and improve clinical implementation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48458,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Psychology Review\",\"volume\":\"121 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102642\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Psychology Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735825001096\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735825001096","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Together and beyond: A systematic review on characteristics and efficacy of transdiagnostic psychotherapeutic group-based interventions for children and adolescents
Transdiagnostic group interventions address the limitations of youth mental health care services, including the disorder-specific nature of existing treatments and the limited capacity of individual psychotherapies. This review synthesizes the 1) characteristics, applications, parental involvement, patient and public involvement (PPI), and 2) data on efficacy, adherence, safety and treatment satisfaction evidence of transdiagnostic group interventions for children and adolescents. Following PRISMA guidelines, a preregistered systematic literature search identified 6845 publications on transdiagnostic in-person group-based interventions for children and adolescents (mean age ≤ 18 years). Two reviewers independently screened for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the RoB-2 and ROBINS-I tool. The review examined 80 studies encompassing 4152 participants (Mage = 12.81 years), mostly conducted in high-income countries. Cognitive behavioural therapy was the most commonly used approach (κ = 59), with the core components mindfulness, emotion regulation, and cognitive restructuring. Interventions averaged 11 sessions and 52 % involved parents. 22 studies targeted anxiety and depression jointly with positive pre-post effects. Significant reductions in symptom severity were also reported for other disorders, though outcome measures highly varied and group comparisons with active control conditions or treatment-as-usual were often non-significant. Few studies examined disorder-unspecific outcomes like psychosocial functioning, quality of life, or reported remission rates, treatment satisfaction or applied a PPI framework. While a large number of different transdiagnostic group interventions for youth have been developed and evaluated, the lack of rigorous reporting and high risk of bias highlight the need for better-quality research to strengthen evidence and improve clinical implementation.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Psychology Review serves as a platform for substantial reviews addressing pertinent topics in clinical psychology. Encompassing a spectrum of issues, from psychopathology to behavior therapy, cognition to cognitive therapies, behavioral medicine to community mental health, assessment, and child development, the journal seeks cutting-edge papers that significantly contribute to advancing the science and/or practice of clinical psychology.
While maintaining a primary focus on topics directly related to clinical psychology, the journal occasionally features reviews on psychophysiology, learning therapy, experimental psychopathology, and social psychology, provided they demonstrate a clear connection to research or practice in clinical psychology. Integrative literature reviews and summaries of innovative ongoing clinical research programs find a place within its pages. However, reports on individual research studies and theoretical treatises or clinical guides lacking an empirical base are deemed inappropriate for publication.