{"title":"环境、社会和治理(ESG)绩效会导致双灵巧创新吗?整合利益相关者理论和制度理论","authors":"Huanyong Ji , Jing Huang , Keke Sun , Zeyu Xing","doi":"10.1016/j.jik.2025.100804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The challenges associated with achieving high Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) performance have become increasingly critical globally, leading to resource allocation issues, compliance complexities, and potential short-term disruptions in innovation activities, particularly within technology-intensive sectors. Despite the growing importance of ESG initiatives, limited studies in management have explored how ESG performance impacts different dimensions of firm innovation. This study investigates how ESG performance influences ambidextrous innovation, namely exploratory and exploitative innovation, among Chinese-listed new energy vehicle companies from 2009 to 2021. The findings reveal a U-shaped relationship, suggesting that initial ESG investments may hinder innovation owing to resource diversion and regulatory pressures, while sustained ESG efforts eventually lead to significant innovation gains. Government subsidies and market competition act as moderating factors in this relationship. Although both factors generally support innovation, their misalignment with ESG strategies may diminish their positive influence. Moreover, we identify financial constraints and risk propensity as mediating mechanisms. Enhanced ESG performance reduces financing barriers and encourages firms to undertake innovation-related risks. These findings offer important insights for policymakers and managers seeking to align ESG practices with innovation objectives, thereby contributing to more sustainable and balanced innovation outcomes in China and beyond.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46792,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Innovation & Knowledge","volume":"10 5","pages":"Article 100804"},"PeriodicalIF":15.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance lead to ambidextrous innovation? Integrating stakeholder and institutional theories\",\"authors\":\"Huanyong Ji , Jing Huang , Keke Sun , Zeyu Xing\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jik.2025.100804\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The challenges associated with achieving high Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) performance have become increasingly critical globally, leading to resource allocation issues, compliance complexities, and potential short-term disruptions in innovation activities, particularly within technology-intensive sectors. Despite the growing importance of ESG initiatives, limited studies in management have explored how ESG performance impacts different dimensions of firm innovation. This study investigates how ESG performance influences ambidextrous innovation, namely exploratory and exploitative innovation, among Chinese-listed new energy vehicle companies from 2009 to 2021. The findings reveal a U-shaped relationship, suggesting that initial ESG investments may hinder innovation owing to resource diversion and regulatory pressures, while sustained ESG efforts eventually lead to significant innovation gains. Government subsidies and market competition act as moderating factors in this relationship. Although both factors generally support innovation, their misalignment with ESG strategies may diminish their positive influence. Moreover, we identify financial constraints and risk propensity as mediating mechanisms. Enhanced ESG performance reduces financing barriers and encourages firms to undertake innovation-related risks. These findings offer important insights for policymakers and managers seeking to align ESG practices with innovation objectives, thereby contributing to more sustainable and balanced innovation outcomes in China and beyond.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46792,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Innovation & Knowledge\",\"volume\":\"10 5\",\"pages\":\"Article 100804\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":15.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Innovation & Knowledge\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444569X25001490\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Innovation & Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444569X25001490","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Does environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance lead to ambidextrous innovation? Integrating stakeholder and institutional theories
The challenges associated with achieving high Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) performance have become increasingly critical globally, leading to resource allocation issues, compliance complexities, and potential short-term disruptions in innovation activities, particularly within technology-intensive sectors. Despite the growing importance of ESG initiatives, limited studies in management have explored how ESG performance impacts different dimensions of firm innovation. This study investigates how ESG performance influences ambidextrous innovation, namely exploratory and exploitative innovation, among Chinese-listed new energy vehicle companies from 2009 to 2021. The findings reveal a U-shaped relationship, suggesting that initial ESG investments may hinder innovation owing to resource diversion and regulatory pressures, while sustained ESG efforts eventually lead to significant innovation gains. Government subsidies and market competition act as moderating factors in this relationship. Although both factors generally support innovation, their misalignment with ESG strategies may diminish their positive influence. Moreover, we identify financial constraints and risk propensity as mediating mechanisms. Enhanced ESG performance reduces financing barriers and encourages firms to undertake innovation-related risks. These findings offer important insights for policymakers and managers seeking to align ESG practices with innovation objectives, thereby contributing to more sustainable and balanced innovation outcomes in China and beyond.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Innovation and Knowledge (JIK) explores how innovation drives knowledge creation and vice versa, emphasizing that not all innovation leads to knowledge, but enduring innovation across diverse fields fosters theory and knowledge. JIK invites papers on innovations enhancing or generating knowledge, covering innovation processes, structures, outcomes, and behaviors at various levels. Articles in JIK examine knowledge-related changes promoting innovation for societal best practices.
JIK serves as a platform for high-quality studies undergoing double-blind peer review, ensuring global dissemination to scholars, practitioners, and policymakers who recognize innovation and knowledge as economic drivers. It publishes theoretical articles, empirical studies, case studies, reviews, and other content, addressing current trends and emerging topics in innovation and knowledge. The journal welcomes suggestions for special issues and encourages articles to showcase contextual differences and lessons for a broad audience.
In essence, JIK is an interdisciplinary journal dedicated to advancing theoretical and practical innovations and knowledge across multiple fields, including Economics, Business and Management, Engineering, Science, and Education.