Jin Mai , Yaoliang Chen , Qinghai Song , Zhiying Xu , Dengsheng Lu , Geping Luo
{"title":"1986-2020年,中国森林采伐和火灾产生的碳排放抵消了大约一半的造林固碳","authors":"Jin Mai , Yaoliang Chen , Qinghai Song , Zhiying Xu , Dengsheng Lu , Geping Luo","doi":"10.1016/j.agrformet.2025.110830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Forest activities and fire disturbance (FAFD) play an important role in the global carbon cycle. Although many studies have been explored to examine the individual effect of forestation, forest harvest, and forest fire on the carbon cycle in China, their combined impacts remain unclear. Moreover, rare research has been examined the impacts of these activities at the species level on the net carbon budget. By integrating remotely sensed, detailed tree species and statistical data into a spatialized modeling approach, we estimated the carbon budget from three major FAFD (i.e., forestation, forest harvest and forest fire) in China during 1986-2020. We found that FAFD overall showed net carbon sequestration of total -710.64±136.4 Tg C with sequestration of -1529.36 ± 202.59 Tg C from forestation and emission of 585.38 ± 29.91 Tg C from forest harvest and 233.34 ± 36.28 Tg C from fire. Spatially, the national average carbon sequestration density from FAFD was -172.95 Mg C km<sup>-2</sup>, with notable regional variations. Carbon emissions from forest harvest and fire offset 53.52% (38.26% and 15.26%, respectively) of carbon sequestration from forestation. More than 90% of tree species exhibited net carbon sequestration from forestation and harvest. The national offset impact of forest harvest varied by tree species, ranging from 3.51% to 101.27%. Owing to high carbon emission from forest harvest, <em>Quercus</em> and <em>Eucalyptus</em> showed large offset effects over 97%. In contrast, <em>Pinus tabulaeformis</em> and <em>Larix</em> demonstrated small offset effects of only 3.51% and 10.23% due to high carbon sequestration. These findings highlight the importance of accounting for carbon emissions from deforestation and forest fire when aiming to maximize carbon sequestration through forestation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50839,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","volume":"375 ","pages":"Article 110830"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Carbon emissions from forest harvest and fire offset approximately half of carbon sequestration of forestation in China during 1986-2020\",\"authors\":\"Jin Mai , Yaoliang Chen , Qinghai Song , Zhiying Xu , Dengsheng Lu , Geping Luo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.agrformet.2025.110830\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Forest activities and fire disturbance (FAFD) play an important role in the global carbon cycle. Although many studies have been explored to examine the individual effect of forestation, forest harvest, and forest fire on the carbon cycle in China, their combined impacts remain unclear. Moreover, rare research has been examined the impacts of these activities at the species level on the net carbon budget. By integrating remotely sensed, detailed tree species and statistical data into a spatialized modeling approach, we estimated the carbon budget from three major FAFD (i.e., forestation, forest harvest and forest fire) in China during 1986-2020. We found that FAFD overall showed net carbon sequestration of total -710.64±136.4 Tg C with sequestration of -1529.36 ± 202.59 Tg C from forestation and emission of 585.38 ± 29.91 Tg C from forest harvest and 233.34 ± 36.28 Tg C from fire. Spatially, the national average carbon sequestration density from FAFD was -172.95 Mg C km<sup>-2</sup>, with notable regional variations. Carbon emissions from forest harvest and fire offset 53.52% (38.26% and 15.26%, respectively) of carbon sequestration from forestation. More than 90% of tree species exhibited net carbon sequestration from forestation and harvest. The national offset impact of forest harvest varied by tree species, ranging from 3.51% to 101.27%. Owing to high carbon emission from forest harvest, <em>Quercus</em> and <em>Eucalyptus</em> showed large offset effects over 97%. In contrast, <em>Pinus tabulaeformis</em> and <em>Larix</em> demonstrated small offset effects of only 3.51% and 10.23% due to high carbon sequestration. These findings highlight the importance of accounting for carbon emissions from deforestation and forest fire when aiming to maximize carbon sequestration through forestation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50839,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology\",\"volume\":\"375 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110830\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168192325004496\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168192325004496","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Carbon emissions from forest harvest and fire offset approximately half of carbon sequestration of forestation in China during 1986-2020
Forest activities and fire disturbance (FAFD) play an important role in the global carbon cycle. Although many studies have been explored to examine the individual effect of forestation, forest harvest, and forest fire on the carbon cycle in China, their combined impacts remain unclear. Moreover, rare research has been examined the impacts of these activities at the species level on the net carbon budget. By integrating remotely sensed, detailed tree species and statistical data into a spatialized modeling approach, we estimated the carbon budget from three major FAFD (i.e., forestation, forest harvest and forest fire) in China during 1986-2020. We found that FAFD overall showed net carbon sequestration of total -710.64±136.4 Tg C with sequestration of -1529.36 ± 202.59 Tg C from forestation and emission of 585.38 ± 29.91 Tg C from forest harvest and 233.34 ± 36.28 Tg C from fire. Spatially, the national average carbon sequestration density from FAFD was -172.95 Mg C km-2, with notable regional variations. Carbon emissions from forest harvest and fire offset 53.52% (38.26% and 15.26%, respectively) of carbon sequestration from forestation. More than 90% of tree species exhibited net carbon sequestration from forestation and harvest. The national offset impact of forest harvest varied by tree species, ranging from 3.51% to 101.27%. Owing to high carbon emission from forest harvest, Quercus and Eucalyptus showed large offset effects over 97%. In contrast, Pinus tabulaeformis and Larix demonstrated small offset effects of only 3.51% and 10.23% due to high carbon sequestration. These findings highlight the importance of accounting for carbon emissions from deforestation and forest fire when aiming to maximize carbon sequestration through forestation.
期刊介绍:
Agricultural and Forest Meteorology is an international journal for the publication of original articles and reviews on the inter-relationship between meteorology, agriculture, forestry, and natural ecosystems. Emphasis is on basic and applied scientific research relevant to practical problems in the field of plant and soil sciences, ecology and biogeochemistry as affected by weather as well as climate variability and change. Theoretical models should be tested against experimental data. Articles must appeal to an international audience. Special issues devoted to single topics are also published.
Typical topics include canopy micrometeorology (e.g. canopy radiation transfer, turbulence near the ground, evapotranspiration, energy balance, fluxes of trace gases), micrometeorological instrumentation (e.g., sensors for trace gases, flux measurement instruments, radiation measurement techniques), aerobiology (e.g. the dispersion of pollen, spores, insects and pesticides), biometeorology (e.g. the effect of weather and climate on plant distribution, crop yield, water-use efficiency, and plant phenology), forest-fire/weather interactions, and feedbacks from vegetation to weather and the climate system.