儿童福利实践中的算法辅助决策工具:系统回顾

IF 1.5 4区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL WORK
Meng-Hsuan Yu, Roderick A. Rose
{"title":"儿童福利实践中的算法辅助决策工具:系统回顾","authors":"Meng-Hsuan Yu, Roderick A. Rose","doi":"10.1177/10497315251350933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Algorithmic-assisted decision-making tools are increasingly used in child welfare services, yet key factors and challenges for successful and ethical implementation remain underexplored. This review centers on fairness, equity, and ethics in their application. Methods: Using PRISMA guidelines and including gray literature, nine studies were reviewed that described algorithmic tools implementation across various stages of the child welfare system. The review focused on identifying challenges and critical success factors, especially concerning fairness, equity, and ethics. Results: This study used a holistic framework to review critical aspects from tool development to deployment. Additionally, strategies to address fairness and ethical considerations were identified and synthesized. Discussion and Applications to Practice: Algorithmic-assisted tools hold promise for supporting high-stakes decisions in child welfare, but responsible use requires attention to ethical implementation. The review reveals significant methodological and empirical gaps, underscoring the need for future research to ensure equitable and effective deployment in practice.","PeriodicalId":47993,"journal":{"name":"Research on Social Work Practice","volume":"144 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Algorithmic-Assisted Decision-Making Tools in Child Welfare Practice: A Systematic Review\",\"authors\":\"Meng-Hsuan Yu, Roderick A. Rose\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10497315251350933\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: Algorithmic-assisted decision-making tools are increasingly used in child welfare services, yet key factors and challenges for successful and ethical implementation remain underexplored. This review centers on fairness, equity, and ethics in their application. Methods: Using PRISMA guidelines and including gray literature, nine studies were reviewed that described algorithmic tools implementation across various stages of the child welfare system. The review focused on identifying challenges and critical success factors, especially concerning fairness, equity, and ethics. Results: This study used a holistic framework to review critical aspects from tool development to deployment. Additionally, strategies to address fairness and ethical considerations were identified and synthesized. Discussion and Applications to Practice: Algorithmic-assisted tools hold promise for supporting high-stakes decisions in child welfare, but responsible use requires attention to ethical implementation. The review reveals significant methodological and empirical gaps, underscoring the need for future research to ensure equitable and effective deployment in practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47993,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research on Social Work Practice\",\"volume\":\"144 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research on Social Work Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10497315251350933\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL WORK\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research on Social Work Practice","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10497315251350933","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:算法辅助决策工具越来越多地用于儿童福利服务,但成功和道德实施的关键因素和挑战仍未得到充分探讨。这次审查的重点是公平、公正和道德在他们的应用。方法:使用PRISMA指南和灰色文献,回顾了9项研究,这些研究描述了在儿童福利系统的各个阶段实施算法工具。审查的重点是确定挑战和关键的成功因素,特别是在公平、公平和道德方面。结果:本研究使用了一个整体框架来回顾从工具开发到部署的关键方面。此外,还确定并综合了解决公平和道德问题的策略。讨论和实践应用:算法辅助工具有望支持儿童福利的高风险决策,但负责任的使用需要注意道德实施。该审查揭示了重大的方法和经验差距,强调需要进行未来的研究,以确保在实践中公平和有效地部署。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Algorithmic-Assisted Decision-Making Tools in Child Welfare Practice: A Systematic Review
Purpose: Algorithmic-assisted decision-making tools are increasingly used in child welfare services, yet key factors and challenges for successful and ethical implementation remain underexplored. This review centers on fairness, equity, and ethics in their application. Methods: Using PRISMA guidelines and including gray literature, nine studies were reviewed that described algorithmic tools implementation across various stages of the child welfare system. The review focused on identifying challenges and critical success factors, especially concerning fairness, equity, and ethics. Results: This study used a holistic framework to review critical aspects from tool development to deployment. Additionally, strategies to address fairness and ethical considerations were identified and synthesized. Discussion and Applications to Practice: Algorithmic-assisted tools hold promise for supporting high-stakes decisions in child welfare, but responsible use requires attention to ethical implementation. The review reveals significant methodological and empirical gaps, underscoring the need for future research to ensure equitable and effective deployment in practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
105
期刊介绍: Research on Social Work Practice, sponsored by the Society for Social Work and Research, is a disciplinary journal devoted to the publication of empirical research concerning the methods and outcomes of social work practice. Social work practice is broadly interpreted to refer to the application of intentionally designed social work intervention programs to problems of societal and/or interpersonal importance, including behavior analysis or psychotherapy involving individuals; case management; practice involving couples, families, and small groups; community practice education; and the development, implementation, and evaluation of social policies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信