癌症治疗诱导的周围和中枢神经毒性的机制和治疗

IF 66.8 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Philipp Karschnia, Thomas A. Nelson, Jorg Dietrich
{"title":"癌症治疗诱导的周围和中枢神经毒性的机制和治疗","authors":"Philipp Karschnia, Thomas A. Nelson, Jorg Dietrich","doi":"10.1038/s41568-025-00863-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Neurotoxicity is a common and potentially severe adverse effect from conventional and novel cancer therapy. The mechanisms that underlie clinical symptoms of central and peripheral nervous system injury remain incompletely understood. For conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy or radiotherapy, direct toxicities to brain structures and neurovascular damage may result in myelin degradation and impaired neurogenesis, which eventually translates into delayed neurodegeneration accompanied by cognitive symptoms. Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy is one of the most prevalent adverse events of chemotherapy, seen specifically with platinum- and taxane-based regimens, vinca alkaloids, thalidomide and bortezomib, and is also emerging as a concerning feature of novel targeted therapies and immunotherapies. In patients treated with molecularly targeted compounds or immune-activating agents, on-target but off-tumour effects and systemic inflammation characterize a distinct clinical profile with predominantly acute neurological symptoms with a phenotype defined by the specific antigen target. The development of mechanistically driven treatment strategies for both central and peripheral nervous system injury from cancer therapies is a major unmet medical need. Clinical trials designed to test pharmacotherapeutic interventions (including anti-dementia drugs or cognitive stimulants) for cognitive symptoms after conventional chemotherapy have produced conflicting results. In the case of acute neurotoxic adverse events from immunotherapies, reversal of T cell expansion together with drugs targeting specific pro-inflammatory interleukins have shown beneficial effects in selected patients. Large clinical trials to test novel strategies and pharmacotherapeutic interventions for acute or delayed neurotoxicity are ongoing. Informed by data derived from clinical trials and preclinical models, promising treatment strategies are on the horizon.</p>","PeriodicalId":19055,"journal":{"name":"Nature Reviews Cancer","volume":"65 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":66.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mechanisms and treatment of cancer therapy-induced peripheral and central neurotoxicity\",\"authors\":\"Philipp Karschnia, Thomas A. Nelson, Jorg Dietrich\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41568-025-00863-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Neurotoxicity is a common and potentially severe adverse effect from conventional and novel cancer therapy. The mechanisms that underlie clinical symptoms of central and peripheral nervous system injury remain incompletely understood. For conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy or radiotherapy, direct toxicities to brain structures and neurovascular damage may result in myelin degradation and impaired neurogenesis, which eventually translates into delayed neurodegeneration accompanied by cognitive symptoms. Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy is one of the most prevalent adverse events of chemotherapy, seen specifically with platinum- and taxane-based regimens, vinca alkaloids, thalidomide and bortezomib, and is also emerging as a concerning feature of novel targeted therapies and immunotherapies. In patients treated with molecularly targeted compounds or immune-activating agents, on-target but off-tumour effects and systemic inflammation characterize a distinct clinical profile with predominantly acute neurological symptoms with a phenotype defined by the specific antigen target. The development of mechanistically driven treatment strategies for both central and peripheral nervous system injury from cancer therapies is a major unmet medical need. Clinical trials designed to test pharmacotherapeutic interventions (including anti-dementia drugs or cognitive stimulants) for cognitive symptoms after conventional chemotherapy have produced conflicting results. In the case of acute neurotoxic adverse events from immunotherapies, reversal of T cell expansion together with drugs targeting specific pro-inflammatory interleukins have shown beneficial effects in selected patients. Large clinical trials to test novel strategies and pharmacotherapeutic interventions for acute or delayed neurotoxicity are ongoing. Informed by data derived from clinical trials and preclinical models, promising treatment strategies are on the horizon.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19055,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature Reviews Cancer\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":66.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature Reviews Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41568-025-00863-2\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Reviews Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41568-025-00863-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

神经毒性是传统和新型癌症治疗中常见的潜在严重不良反应。中枢和周围神经系统损伤的临床症状的机制仍然不完全清楚。对于传统的细胞毒性化疗或放疗,对脑结构和神经血管的直接毒性可导致髓磷脂降解和神经发生受损,最终转化为伴认知症状的迟发性神经变性。化疗引起的周围神经病变是化疗最常见的不良事件之一,特别是以铂和紫杉烷为基础的方案,长春花生物碱,沙利度胺和硼替佐米,也正在成为新的靶向治疗和免疫治疗的一个令人关注的特征。在接受分子靶向化合物或免疫激活剂治疗的患者中,靶向但非肿瘤效应和全身性炎症具有明显的临床特征,主要是急性神经系统症状,其表型由特定抗原靶点定义。癌症治疗引起的中枢和周围神经系统损伤的机械驱动治疗策略的发展是一个主要的未满足的医疗需求。旨在测试常规化疗后认知症状的药物治疗干预(包括抗痴呆药物或认知兴奋剂)的临床试验产生了相互矛盾的结果。在免疫治疗急性神经毒性不良事件的情况下,逆转T细胞扩增和靶向特异性促炎白细胞介素的药物在选定的患者中显示出有益的效果。目前正在进行大型临床试验,以测试急性或延迟性神经毒性的新策略和药物治疗干预措施。根据来自临床试验和临床前模型的数据,有希望的治疗策略即将出现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Mechanisms and treatment of cancer therapy-induced peripheral and central neurotoxicity

Mechanisms and treatment of cancer therapy-induced peripheral and central neurotoxicity

Neurotoxicity is a common and potentially severe adverse effect from conventional and novel cancer therapy. The mechanisms that underlie clinical symptoms of central and peripheral nervous system injury remain incompletely understood. For conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy or radiotherapy, direct toxicities to brain structures and neurovascular damage may result in myelin degradation and impaired neurogenesis, which eventually translates into delayed neurodegeneration accompanied by cognitive symptoms. Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy is one of the most prevalent adverse events of chemotherapy, seen specifically with platinum- and taxane-based regimens, vinca alkaloids, thalidomide and bortezomib, and is also emerging as a concerning feature of novel targeted therapies and immunotherapies. In patients treated with molecularly targeted compounds or immune-activating agents, on-target but off-tumour effects and systemic inflammation characterize a distinct clinical profile with predominantly acute neurological symptoms with a phenotype defined by the specific antigen target. The development of mechanistically driven treatment strategies for both central and peripheral nervous system injury from cancer therapies is a major unmet medical need. Clinical trials designed to test pharmacotherapeutic interventions (including anti-dementia drugs or cognitive stimulants) for cognitive symptoms after conventional chemotherapy have produced conflicting results. In the case of acute neurotoxic adverse events from immunotherapies, reversal of T cell expansion together with drugs targeting specific pro-inflammatory interleukins have shown beneficial effects in selected patients. Large clinical trials to test novel strategies and pharmacotherapeutic interventions for acute or delayed neurotoxicity are ongoing. Informed by data derived from clinical trials and preclinical models, promising treatment strategies are on the horizon.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nature Reviews Cancer
Nature Reviews Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
111.90
自引率
0.40%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nature Reviews Cancer, a part of the Nature Reviews portfolio of journals, aims to be the premier source of reviews and commentaries for the scientific communities it serves. The correct abbreviation for abstracting and indexing purposes is Nat. Rev. Cancer. The international standard serial numbers (ISSN) for Nature Reviews Cancer are 1474-175X (print) and 1474-1768 (online). Unlike other journals, Nature Reviews Cancer does not have an external editorial board. Instead, all editorial decisions are made by a team of full-time professional editors who are PhD-level scientists. The journal publishes Research Highlights, Comments, Reviews, and Perspectives relevant to cancer researchers, ensuring that the articles reach the widest possible audience due to their broad scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信