{"title":"解决小规模渔业中的冲突","authors":"Almudena Cánovas Molina, Sophie Gourguet","doi":"10.1111/faf.70026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Conflicts are presumably pervading small‐scale fishery (SSF) systems around the world due to the highly complex interactions taking place within them. To provide a deeper understanding of these conflicts and the resolution strategies in place, a literature review was conducted. Despite the unique and complex conflicts encountered, certain common patterns emerged across the studies in their drivers, stakeholders involved, intensity, responses and resolution strategies. In total, 194 publications documenting conflicts across 201 locations worldwide were analysed. Conflicts were reported both within SSF and between SSF and 13 other groups and activities, primarily with large‐scale fisheries (LSF) and public authorities. Competition over resources and space, along with restrictions to fishing, were the most common drivers of conflict. These were occasionally associated with ethnics, political corruption and resentment among others. Violent responses were rather frequent, yet some cooperation strategies also emerged in the midst of tensions. Stakeholder engagement and new regulations were the most frequent strategies to de‐escalate conflicts, although the efficacy of these approaches varied across locations. Although combinations of conflict resolution strategies were used in some instances, strategies were combined in no more than two or three at a time and in less than half of the de‐escalated cases. This highlights a lack of multifaceted conflict resolution strategies.","PeriodicalId":169,"journal":{"name":"Fish and Fisheries","volume":"131 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Untangling Conflicts in Small‐Scale Fisheries\",\"authors\":\"Almudena Cánovas Molina, Sophie Gourguet\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/faf.70026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Conflicts are presumably pervading small‐scale fishery (SSF) systems around the world due to the highly complex interactions taking place within them. To provide a deeper understanding of these conflicts and the resolution strategies in place, a literature review was conducted. Despite the unique and complex conflicts encountered, certain common patterns emerged across the studies in their drivers, stakeholders involved, intensity, responses and resolution strategies. In total, 194 publications documenting conflicts across 201 locations worldwide were analysed. Conflicts were reported both within SSF and between SSF and 13 other groups and activities, primarily with large‐scale fisheries (LSF) and public authorities. Competition over resources and space, along with restrictions to fishing, were the most common drivers of conflict. These were occasionally associated with ethnics, political corruption and resentment among others. Violent responses were rather frequent, yet some cooperation strategies also emerged in the midst of tensions. Stakeholder engagement and new regulations were the most frequent strategies to de‐escalate conflicts, although the efficacy of these approaches varied across locations. Although combinations of conflict resolution strategies were used in some instances, strategies were combined in no more than two or three at a time and in less than half of the de‐escalated cases. This highlights a lack of multifaceted conflict resolution strategies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":169,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fish and Fisheries\",\"volume\":\"131 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fish and Fisheries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.70026\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FISHERIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fish and Fisheries","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.70026","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Conflicts are presumably pervading small‐scale fishery (SSF) systems around the world due to the highly complex interactions taking place within them. To provide a deeper understanding of these conflicts and the resolution strategies in place, a literature review was conducted. Despite the unique and complex conflicts encountered, certain common patterns emerged across the studies in their drivers, stakeholders involved, intensity, responses and resolution strategies. In total, 194 publications documenting conflicts across 201 locations worldwide were analysed. Conflicts were reported both within SSF and between SSF and 13 other groups and activities, primarily with large‐scale fisheries (LSF) and public authorities. Competition over resources and space, along with restrictions to fishing, were the most common drivers of conflict. These were occasionally associated with ethnics, political corruption and resentment among others. Violent responses were rather frequent, yet some cooperation strategies also emerged in the midst of tensions. Stakeholder engagement and new regulations were the most frequent strategies to de‐escalate conflicts, although the efficacy of these approaches varied across locations. Although combinations of conflict resolution strategies were used in some instances, strategies were combined in no more than two or three at a time and in less than half of the de‐escalated cases. This highlights a lack of multifaceted conflict resolution strategies.
期刊介绍:
Fish and Fisheries adopts a broad, interdisciplinary approach to the subject of fish biology and fisheries. It draws contributions in the form of major synoptic papers and syntheses or meta-analyses that lay out new approaches, re-examine existing findings, methods or theory, and discuss papers and commentaries from diverse areas. Focal areas include fish palaeontology, molecular biology and ecology, genetics, biochemistry, physiology, ecology, behaviour, evolutionary studies, conservation, assessment, population dynamics, mathematical modelling, ecosystem analysis and the social, economic and policy aspects of fisheries where they are grounded in a scientific approach. A paper in Fish and Fisheries must draw upon all key elements of the existing literature on a topic, normally have a broad geographic and/or taxonomic scope, and provide general points which make it compelling to a wide range of readers whatever their geographical location. So, in short, we aim to publish articles that make syntheses of old or synoptic, long-term or spatially widespread data, introduce or consolidate fresh concepts or theory, or, in the Ghoti section, briefly justify preliminary, new synoptic ideas. Please note that authors of submissions not meeting this mandate will be directed to the appropriate primary literature.