{"title":"末梢丝切片后系扎的发生率及影响因素。","authors":"Duygu Baykal, Mevlut Ozgur Taskapilioglu","doi":"10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.48880-25.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the incidence of retethering in patients who underwent surgery for tethered cord in our clinic.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We included patients who underwent surgical intervention for tethered cord in our clinic between 2010 and 2020, and were subsequently diagnosed with retethering during follow-up. Only those with available postoperative clinical follow-up data were included. The study analyzed the timing of surgery, gender, presenting symptoms, intraoperative findings, postoperative outcomes?including complications?and follow-up duration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over a 10-year period, 59 patients underwent surgery for tethered cord. Among them, 11 patients required reoperation for retethering at a median age of 5 years. The median interval between the initial and retethering surgeries was 47.6±43.20 months. Two patients were asymptomatic at the time of their initial surgery. Among the 11 patients with retethering, 3 (27.2%) presented with bladder or bowel dysfunction, 4 (36.3%) with neuro-orthopedic symptoms, and 4 (36.3%) with pain. Two patients experienced a second episode of retethering and required a third surgery, which occurred approximately 2 years after the second procedure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The risk of retethering should be carefully monitored in patients with tethered cord, particularly during growth periods.</p>","PeriodicalId":94381,"journal":{"name":"Turkish neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"709-714"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incidence and Factors of Tethering After Sectioning the Filum Terminale.\",\"authors\":\"Duygu Baykal, Mevlut Ozgur Taskapilioglu\",\"doi\":\"10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.48880-25.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the incidence of retethering in patients who underwent surgery for tethered cord in our clinic.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We included patients who underwent surgical intervention for tethered cord in our clinic between 2010 and 2020, and were subsequently diagnosed with retethering during follow-up. Only those with available postoperative clinical follow-up data were included. The study analyzed the timing of surgery, gender, presenting symptoms, intraoperative findings, postoperative outcomes?including complications?and follow-up duration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over a 10-year period, 59 patients underwent surgery for tethered cord. Among them, 11 patients required reoperation for retethering at a median age of 5 years. The median interval between the initial and retethering surgeries was 47.6±43.20 months. Two patients were asymptomatic at the time of their initial surgery. Among the 11 patients with retethering, 3 (27.2%) presented with bladder or bowel dysfunction, 4 (36.3%) with neuro-orthopedic symptoms, and 4 (36.3%) with pain. Two patients experienced a second episode of retethering and required a third surgery, which occurred approximately 2 years after the second procedure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The risk of retethering should be carefully monitored in patients with tethered cord, particularly during growth periods.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94381,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turkish neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"709-714\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turkish neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.48880-25.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.48880-25.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Incidence and Factors of Tethering After Sectioning the Filum Terminale.
Aim: To assess the incidence of retethering in patients who underwent surgery for tethered cord in our clinic.
Material and methods: We included patients who underwent surgical intervention for tethered cord in our clinic between 2010 and 2020, and were subsequently diagnosed with retethering during follow-up. Only those with available postoperative clinical follow-up data were included. The study analyzed the timing of surgery, gender, presenting symptoms, intraoperative findings, postoperative outcomes?including complications?and follow-up duration.
Results: Over a 10-year period, 59 patients underwent surgery for tethered cord. Among them, 11 patients required reoperation for retethering at a median age of 5 years. The median interval between the initial and retethering surgeries was 47.6±43.20 months. Two patients were asymptomatic at the time of their initial surgery. Among the 11 patients with retethering, 3 (27.2%) presented with bladder or bowel dysfunction, 4 (36.3%) with neuro-orthopedic symptoms, and 4 (36.3%) with pain. Two patients experienced a second episode of retethering and required a third surgery, which occurred approximately 2 years after the second procedure.
Conclusion: The risk of retethering should be carefully monitored in patients with tethered cord, particularly during growth periods.