F Zingari, F Gallo, A Madonna, S Barone, M Borelli, A Giudice
{"title":"100个颧骨植入体颧骨植入体接合的三维评估:回顾性研究。","authors":"F Zingari, F Gallo, A Madonna, S Barone, M Borelli, A Giudice","doi":"10.1016/j.ijom.2025.08.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study was performed to evaluate the amount of bone implant engagement (BIE) of zygomatic implants (ZIs) at the malar bone level and its correlation with the ZAGA classification (zygoma anatomy-guided approach). One hundred ZIs placed in 32 patients with severe maxillary atrophy using a fully digital protocol were assessed: 80 placed in pairs (40 anterior (AI), 40 posterior (PI)) and 20 as single ZIs (SI). The ZAGA classification was determined preoperatively. Postoperative computed tomography scans were analysed using 3D Slicer to measure medial and lateral BIE, the mean value of these (mvBIE), and the ferrule area. Comparisons of the mean mvBIE of the implants (AI, PI, SI) were made according to the ZAGA categories and within each ZAGA group. Descriptive statistics and a linear mixed-effects model were performed (α = 0.05). The overall mean mvBIE was 12.38 ± 3.53 mm (AI: 12.38 ± 3.85 mm, PI: 11.50 ± 3.01 mm, SI: 14.16 ± 3.32 mm). A significant relationship was found between mvBIE and the ZAGA classification (0.005 <P < 0.008), with the lowest mean mvBIE in ZAGA 0 and ZAGA 4, and progressively increasing from ZAGA 1 to ZAGA 3. The mean mvBIE was significantly lower in PI compared to AI and SI (0.001 <P < 0.011). Three-dimensional analysis provided detailed measurements of mvBIE in ZIs placed using a digitally guided protocol. Considerable mvBIE variation among implant positions between and within ZAGA categories was observed, highlighting the influence of implant location and anatomy on bone engagement.</p>","PeriodicalId":94053,"journal":{"name":"International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Three-dimensional assessment of the malar bone implant engagement of 100 zygomatic implants: a retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"F Zingari, F Gallo, A Madonna, S Barone, M Borelli, A Giudice\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijom.2025.08.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study was performed to evaluate the amount of bone implant engagement (BIE) of zygomatic implants (ZIs) at the malar bone level and its correlation with the ZAGA classification (zygoma anatomy-guided approach). One hundred ZIs placed in 32 patients with severe maxillary atrophy using a fully digital protocol were assessed: 80 placed in pairs (40 anterior (AI), 40 posterior (PI)) and 20 as single ZIs (SI). The ZAGA classification was determined preoperatively. Postoperative computed tomography scans were analysed using 3D Slicer to measure medial and lateral BIE, the mean value of these (mvBIE), and the ferrule area. Comparisons of the mean mvBIE of the implants (AI, PI, SI) were made according to the ZAGA categories and within each ZAGA group. Descriptive statistics and a linear mixed-effects model were performed (α = 0.05). The overall mean mvBIE was 12.38 ± 3.53 mm (AI: 12.38 ± 3.85 mm, PI: 11.50 ± 3.01 mm, SI: 14.16 ± 3.32 mm). A significant relationship was found between mvBIE and the ZAGA classification (0.005 <P < 0.008), with the lowest mean mvBIE in ZAGA 0 and ZAGA 4, and progressively increasing from ZAGA 1 to ZAGA 3. The mean mvBIE was significantly lower in PI compared to AI and SI (0.001 <P < 0.011). Three-dimensional analysis provided detailed measurements of mvBIE in ZIs placed using a digitally guided protocol. Considerable mvBIE variation among implant positions between and within ZAGA categories was observed, highlighting the influence of implant location and anatomy on bone engagement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94053,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2025.08.009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2025.08.009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究旨在评估颧骨植入体(ZIs)在颧骨水平的骨植入量(BIE)及其与ZAGA分类(颧骨解剖引导入路)的相关性。使用全数字方案评估了32例严重上颌萎缩患者的100个ZIs: 80个成对放置(40个前路(AI), 40个后路(PI))和20个单个ZIs (SI)。术前确定ZAGA分型。术后计算机断层扫描分析使用3D切片机测量内侧和外侧BIE,这些平均值(mvBIE)和卡箍面积。根据ZAGA分类和每个ZAGA组比较种植体(AI, PI, SI)的平均mvBIE。描述性统计和线性混合效应模型(α = 0.05)。总体平均mvBIE为12.38±3.53 mm (AI: 12.38±3.85 mm, PI: 11.50±3.01 mm, SI: 14.16±3.32 mm)。mvBIE与ZAGA分类之间存在显著相关(0.005)
Three-dimensional assessment of the malar bone implant engagement of 100 zygomatic implants: a retrospective study.
This study was performed to evaluate the amount of bone implant engagement (BIE) of zygomatic implants (ZIs) at the malar bone level and its correlation with the ZAGA classification (zygoma anatomy-guided approach). One hundred ZIs placed in 32 patients with severe maxillary atrophy using a fully digital protocol were assessed: 80 placed in pairs (40 anterior (AI), 40 posterior (PI)) and 20 as single ZIs (SI). The ZAGA classification was determined preoperatively. Postoperative computed tomography scans were analysed using 3D Slicer to measure medial and lateral BIE, the mean value of these (mvBIE), and the ferrule area. Comparisons of the mean mvBIE of the implants (AI, PI, SI) were made according to the ZAGA categories and within each ZAGA group. Descriptive statistics and a linear mixed-effects model were performed (α = 0.05). The overall mean mvBIE was 12.38 ± 3.53 mm (AI: 12.38 ± 3.85 mm, PI: 11.50 ± 3.01 mm, SI: 14.16 ± 3.32 mm). A significant relationship was found between mvBIE and the ZAGA classification (0.005