时间和局部因素对亲水性自攻组织级种植体稳定性的影响:1年前瞻性研究。

IF 2.5
Paolo Carosi, Claudia Lorenzi, Riccardo Di Gianfilippo, Vincenzo Campanella, Hom-Lay Wang, Claudio Arcuri
{"title":"时间和局部因素对亲水性自攻组织级种植体稳定性的影响:1年前瞻性研究。","authors":"Paolo Carosi, Claudia Lorenzi, Riccardo Di Gianfilippo, Vincenzo Campanella, Hom-Lay Wang, Claudio Arcuri","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate changes in implant stability quotient values of hydrophilic tissue-level implants over time, and to investigate the influence of local factors on variations in these values.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty tapered, self-tapping, tissue-level implants with a hydrophilic surface were placed and monitored for 12 months. Implant stability quotient values were recorded at the time of insertion (T0) and monthly thereafter for 12 months. All implants were restored with screw-retained restorations 2 months after placement. A repeated measures analysis of variance was used to evaluate the trends in implant stability quotient values over time. A multiple linear regression model was employed to determine the impact of various factors on changes in implant stability quotient values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Implant stability quotient values decreased from T0 to T1, although this reduction was not statistically significant (P = 0.28). The greatest decrease was observed in implants with initially high implant stability quotient values at T0 (P 0.05). Values increased significantly at each subsequent time point (P 0.001). A significant time effect was noted between immediate and delayed placement protocols (P 0.05), with immediate implants demonstrating lower initial implant stability quotient values but a steeper increase over time. Implants placed in the mandible and wider implants in molar sites showed higher implant stability quotient values compared to those placed in the maxilla and narrower implants (mandible vs maxilla P 0.05; wide molar vs regular premolar P 0.05). Insertion torque was positively correlated with implant stability quotient values at T0 (P 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The lowest implant stability quotient value was recorded 1 month after implant placement, and then increased consistently throughout the study period without reaching a plateau. Implants placed immediately showed a steeper improvement in implant stability quotient values.</p><p><strong>Conflict-of-interest statement: </strong>The authors declare there are no conflicts of interest relating to this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":73463,"journal":{"name":"International journal of oral implantology (Berlin, Germany)","volume":"18 3","pages":"225-240"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of time and local factors on the stability of hydrophilic self-tapping tissue-level implants: 1-year prospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Paolo Carosi, Claudia Lorenzi, Riccardo Di Gianfilippo, Vincenzo Campanella, Hom-Lay Wang, Claudio Arcuri\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate changes in implant stability quotient values of hydrophilic tissue-level implants over time, and to investigate the influence of local factors on variations in these values.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty tapered, self-tapping, tissue-level implants with a hydrophilic surface were placed and monitored for 12 months. Implant stability quotient values were recorded at the time of insertion (T0) and monthly thereafter for 12 months. All implants were restored with screw-retained restorations 2 months after placement. A repeated measures analysis of variance was used to evaluate the trends in implant stability quotient values over time. A multiple linear regression model was employed to determine the impact of various factors on changes in implant stability quotient values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Implant stability quotient values decreased from T0 to T1, although this reduction was not statistically significant (P = 0.28). The greatest decrease was observed in implants with initially high implant stability quotient values at T0 (P 0.05). Values increased significantly at each subsequent time point (P 0.001). A significant time effect was noted between immediate and delayed placement protocols (P 0.05), with immediate implants demonstrating lower initial implant stability quotient values but a steeper increase over time. Implants placed in the mandible and wider implants in molar sites showed higher implant stability quotient values compared to those placed in the maxilla and narrower implants (mandible vs maxilla P 0.05; wide molar vs regular premolar P 0.05). Insertion torque was positively correlated with implant stability quotient values at T0 (P 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The lowest implant stability quotient value was recorded 1 month after implant placement, and then increased consistently throughout the study period without reaching a plateau. Implants placed immediately showed a steeper improvement in implant stability quotient values.</p><p><strong>Conflict-of-interest statement: </strong>The authors declare there are no conflicts of interest relating to this study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73463,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of oral implantology (Berlin, Germany)\",\"volume\":\"18 3\",\"pages\":\"225-240\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of oral implantology (Berlin, Germany)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of oral implantology (Berlin, Germany)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价亲水组织水平种植体稳定商值随时间的变化,并探讨局部因素对其变化的影响。方法:放置50个具有亲水性表面的锥形自攻组织级植入物并监测12个月。植入时(T0)记录种植体稳定商值,此后12个月每月记录一次。所有种植体在放置后2个月均采用螺钉保留修复体进行修复。重复测量方差分析用于评估种植体稳定商值随时间的变化趋势。采用多元线性回归模型确定各因素对种植体稳定商值变化的影响。结果:种植体稳定商值从T0到T1下降,尽管这种下降没有统计学意义(P = 0.28)。在T0时,种植体稳定性商初始值较高的种植体下降幅度最大(p0.05)。在随后的每个时间点,数值显著增加(P < 0.001)。即刻植入和延迟植入方案之间存在显著的时间效应(p0.05),即刻植入显示出较低的初始种植体稳定性商值,但随着时间的推移,其增加幅度更大。下颌骨种植体和较宽的臼齿种植体比上颌种植体和较窄的种植体表现出更高的种植体稳定性商值(下颌骨vs上颌P 0.05;宽臼齿vs规则前臼齿P 0.05)。植入扭矩与T0时种植体稳定性商值呈正相关(P < 0.001)。结论:种植体稳定商值在种植体放置后1个月达到最低,然后在整个研究期间持续增加,未达到平台期。立即放置的种植体在种植体稳定商值上有更大的改善。利益冲突声明:作者声明本研究不存在利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of time and local factors on the stability of hydrophilic self-tapping tissue-level implants: 1-year prospective study.

Purpose: To evaluate changes in implant stability quotient values of hydrophilic tissue-level implants over time, and to investigate the influence of local factors on variations in these values.

Methods: Fifty tapered, self-tapping, tissue-level implants with a hydrophilic surface were placed and monitored for 12 months. Implant stability quotient values were recorded at the time of insertion (T0) and monthly thereafter for 12 months. All implants were restored with screw-retained restorations 2 months after placement. A repeated measures analysis of variance was used to evaluate the trends in implant stability quotient values over time. A multiple linear regression model was employed to determine the impact of various factors on changes in implant stability quotient values.

Results: Implant stability quotient values decreased from T0 to T1, although this reduction was not statistically significant (P = 0.28). The greatest decrease was observed in implants with initially high implant stability quotient values at T0 (P 0.05). Values increased significantly at each subsequent time point (P 0.001). A significant time effect was noted between immediate and delayed placement protocols (P 0.05), with immediate implants demonstrating lower initial implant stability quotient values but a steeper increase over time. Implants placed in the mandible and wider implants in molar sites showed higher implant stability quotient values compared to those placed in the maxilla and narrower implants (mandible vs maxilla P 0.05; wide molar vs regular premolar P 0.05). Insertion torque was positively correlated with implant stability quotient values at T0 (P 0.001).

Conclusions: The lowest implant stability quotient value was recorded 1 month after implant placement, and then increased consistently throughout the study period without reaching a plateau. Implants placed immediately showed a steeper improvement in implant stability quotient values.

Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare there are no conflicts of interest relating to this study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信