Chengzhi Mao, Xinghao Li, Micah Dunthorn, Wenxin Xu, Xiaotian Luo, Xueping Xiong, Saleh A Al-Farraj, Jie Huang
{"title":"淡水养殖池塘浮游动物群落多样性及其聚集机制。","authors":"Chengzhi Mao, Xinghao Li, Micah Dunthorn, Wenxin Xu, Xiaotian Luo, Xueping Xiong, Saleh A Al-Farraj, Jie Huang","doi":"10.1007/s42995-025-00297-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ecological succession is vital for forecasting ecosystem responses to environmental changes and their future states. Zooplankton, a primary natural food source in aquaculture, plays a crucial role in maintaining ecosystem function. Thus, understanding how zooplankton communities respond to environmental changes is essential for economic and ecological outcomes. In this study, we examined three types of aquaculture ponds (crab, crayfish, and fish ponds) with over 10 years of history and analyzed 27 environmental factors potentially influencing zooplankton dynamics throughout the year. Our results showed that Rotifera was the most abundant group in all three pond types, followed by Protista, Cladocera, and Copepoda. The dominant species across different seasons and ponds were <i>Polyarthra vulgaris</i>, <i>Anuraeopsis fissa</i>, and <i>Trichocerca pusilla</i>. The alpha diversity of zooplankton was influenced by various environmental factors across different pond types, with significant effects of antibiotics observed only in the fish ponds. The temporal and spatial distributions of zooplankton communities varied significantly. Deterministic processes, driven primarily by temperature and ammonia nitrogen, were identified as the primary mechanisms influencing zooplankton community assembly in freshwater aquaculture ponds. These findings inform management practices aimed at regulating key environmental drivers and optimizing zooplankton dynamics, with implications for maintaining ecosystem stability and productivity and, ultimately, supporting sustainable aquaculture.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s42995-025-00297-7.</p>","PeriodicalId":53218,"journal":{"name":"Marine Life Science & Technology","volume":"7 3","pages":"549-564"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12413362/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diversity and assembly mechanisms of zooplankton communities in freshwater aquaculture ponds.\",\"authors\":\"Chengzhi Mao, Xinghao Li, Micah Dunthorn, Wenxin Xu, Xiaotian Luo, Xueping Xiong, Saleh A Al-Farraj, Jie Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s42995-025-00297-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Ecological succession is vital for forecasting ecosystem responses to environmental changes and their future states. Zooplankton, a primary natural food source in aquaculture, plays a crucial role in maintaining ecosystem function. Thus, understanding how zooplankton communities respond to environmental changes is essential for economic and ecological outcomes. In this study, we examined three types of aquaculture ponds (crab, crayfish, and fish ponds) with over 10 years of history and analyzed 27 environmental factors potentially influencing zooplankton dynamics throughout the year. Our results showed that Rotifera was the most abundant group in all three pond types, followed by Protista, Cladocera, and Copepoda. The dominant species across different seasons and ponds were <i>Polyarthra vulgaris</i>, <i>Anuraeopsis fissa</i>, and <i>Trichocerca pusilla</i>. The alpha diversity of zooplankton was influenced by various environmental factors across different pond types, with significant effects of antibiotics observed only in the fish ponds. The temporal and spatial distributions of zooplankton communities varied significantly. Deterministic processes, driven primarily by temperature and ammonia nitrogen, were identified as the primary mechanisms influencing zooplankton community assembly in freshwater aquaculture ponds. These findings inform management practices aimed at regulating key environmental drivers and optimizing zooplankton dynamics, with implications for maintaining ecosystem stability and productivity and, ultimately, supporting sustainable aquaculture.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s42995-025-00297-7.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53218,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Marine Life Science & Technology\",\"volume\":\"7 3\",\"pages\":\"549-564\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12413362/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Marine Life Science & Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42995-025-00297-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine Life Science & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42995-025-00297-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Diversity and assembly mechanisms of zooplankton communities in freshwater aquaculture ponds.
Ecological succession is vital for forecasting ecosystem responses to environmental changes and their future states. Zooplankton, a primary natural food source in aquaculture, plays a crucial role in maintaining ecosystem function. Thus, understanding how zooplankton communities respond to environmental changes is essential for economic and ecological outcomes. In this study, we examined three types of aquaculture ponds (crab, crayfish, and fish ponds) with over 10 years of history and analyzed 27 environmental factors potentially influencing zooplankton dynamics throughout the year. Our results showed that Rotifera was the most abundant group in all three pond types, followed by Protista, Cladocera, and Copepoda. The dominant species across different seasons and ponds were Polyarthra vulgaris, Anuraeopsis fissa, and Trichocerca pusilla. The alpha diversity of zooplankton was influenced by various environmental factors across different pond types, with significant effects of antibiotics observed only in the fish ponds. The temporal and spatial distributions of zooplankton communities varied significantly. Deterministic processes, driven primarily by temperature and ammonia nitrogen, were identified as the primary mechanisms influencing zooplankton community assembly in freshwater aquaculture ponds. These findings inform management practices aimed at regulating key environmental drivers and optimizing zooplankton dynamics, with implications for maintaining ecosystem stability and productivity and, ultimately, supporting sustainable aquaculture.
Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s42995-025-00297-7.
期刊介绍:
Marine Life Science & Technology (MLST), established in 2019, is dedicated to publishing original research papers that unveil new discoveries and theories spanning a wide spectrum of life sciences and technologies. This includes fundamental biology, fisheries science and technology, medicinal bioresources, food science, biotechnology, ecology, and environmental biology, with a particular focus on marine habitats.
The journal is committed to nurturing synergistic interactions among these diverse disciplines, striving to advance multidisciplinary approaches within the scientific field. It caters to a readership comprising biological scientists, aquaculture researchers, marine technologists, biological oceanographers, and ecologists.