关系、信任和问责制以及批判性反思：开发“难以达到”的高质量数据。

IF 2.7 1区社会学 Q1 COMMUNICATION

Public Opinion Quarterly Pub Date : 2025-08-06 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/poq/nfaf032

Anna Kopec, Alison Smith, Genevieve Fuji Johnson

{"title":"关系、信任和问责制以及批判性反思：开发“难以达到”的高质量数据。","authors":"Anna Kopec, Alison Smith, Genevieve Fuji Johnson","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfaf032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Understanding the realities of members of marginalized communities is central to the advancement of social and behavioral sciences. We argue that the development of data accurately representing the perspectives and experiences of such communities is fundamentally contingent on relationships of trust and accountability, and on researcher critical reflexivity. We showcase our methodology in three vignettes based on how we conduct research with communities that are \"hard to reach\" due to their societal marginalization. These vignettes include our reflections on the quality of data as a function of relationships, trust, accountability, and critical reflexivity. Our stories from the field highlight the importance of relational research with communities experiencing marginalization.","PeriodicalId":51359,"journal":{"name":"Public Opinion Quarterly","volume":"89 SI","pages":"565-589"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12411916/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relationships, Trust and Accountability, and Critical Reflexivity: Developing Quality Data with the \\\"Hard to Reach\\\".\",\"authors\":\"Anna Kopec, Alison Smith, Genevieve Fuji Johnson\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/poq/nfaf032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Understanding the realities of members of marginalized communities is central to the advancement of social and behavioral sciences. We argue that the development of data accurately representing the perspectives and experiences of such communities is fundamentally contingent on relationships of trust and accountability, and on researcher critical reflexivity. We showcase our methodology in three vignettes based on how we conduct research with communities that are \\\"hard to reach\\\" due to their societal marginalization. These vignettes include our reflections on the quality of data as a function of relationships, trust, accountability, and critical reflexivity. Our stories from the field highlight the importance of relational research with communities experiencing marginalization.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51359,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Opinion Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"89 SI\",\"pages\":\"565-589\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12411916/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Opinion Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfaf032\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Opinion Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfaf032","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

了解边缘化群体成员的现实情况对社会和行为科学的进步至关重要。我们认为，准确地代表这些社区的观点和经验的数据的发展从根本上取决于信任和问责关系，以及研究人员的批判性反思。我们在三个小插曲中展示了我们的方法，这些方法基于我们如何与由于社会边缘化而“难以接触”的社区进行研究。这些小插曲包括我们对数据质量作为关系、信任、问责制和批判性反身性的函数的思考。我们从该领域的故事强调了与经历边缘化的社区进行关系研究的重要性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Relationships, Trust and Accountability, and Critical Reflexivity: Developing Quality Data with the "Hard to Reach".

Understanding the realities of members of marginalized communities is central to the advancement of social and behavioral sciences. We argue that the development of data accurately representing the perspectives and experiences of such communities is fundamentally contingent on relationships of trust and accountability, and on researcher critical reflexivity. We showcase our methodology in three vignettes based on how we conduct research with communities that are "hard to reach" due to their societal marginalization. These vignettes include our reflections on the quality of data as a function of relationships, trust, accountability, and critical reflexivity. Our stories from the field highlight the importance of relational research with communities experiencing marginalization.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Public Opinion Quarterly Multiple-

CiteScore

4.40

自引率

2.90%

发文量

期刊介绍： Published since 1937, Public Opinion Quarterly is among the most frequently cited journals of its kind. Such interdisciplinary leadership benefits academicians and all social science researchers by providing a trusted source for a wide range of high quality research. POQ selectively publishes important theoretical contributions to opinion and communication research, analyses of current public opinion, and investigations of methodological issues involved in survey validity—including questionnaire construction, interviewing and interviewers, sampling strategy, and mode of administration. The theoretical and methodological advances detailed in pages of POQ ensure its importance as a research resource.