美国印第安社区成员对阿片类药物使用障碍的担忧:一项定性的二次分析。

IF 2.7 1区 社会学 Q1 COMMUNICATION
Public Opinion Quarterly Pub Date : 2025-08-07 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/poq/nfaf030
Fiona Grubin, Morgan E Neavill, Tessa Sawyer, Amanda Larson, Emily Maltaverne, Monica C Skewes
{"title":"美国印第安社区成员对阿片类药物使用障碍的担忧:一项定性的二次分析。","authors":"Fiona Grubin, Morgan E Neavill, Tessa Sawyer, Amanda Larson, Emily Maltaverne, Monica C Skewes","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfaf030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Opioid use disorder and mortality due to opioid overdose pose significant public health problems in the United States, particularly among American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) communities that experience disproportionately high rates of opioid overdose deaths. Such health inequities are related to centuries of ongoing colonization and oppression that inform social determinants of health today. Using medications to treat opioid use disorder (MOUD) has broad support among health professionals due to substantial evidence of its effectiveness and benefits to patients. However, most AI/ANs who need MOUD never receive it. This analysis sought to identify concerns related to the use of MOUD and how they inform barriers to implementing MOUD in a rural AI reservation community. Secondary analysis of qualitative data was conducted using reflexive thematic analysis. Findings reveal key themes related to conditions for when to use MOUD, recovery, distrust of Western medicine, and individual viewpoints on MOUD. Implications of these findings for reducing barriers to MOUD in AI/AN communities are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":51359,"journal":{"name":"Public Opinion Quarterly","volume":"89 SI","pages":"539-564"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12411911/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Concerns About Medications for Opioid Use Disorder Among American Indian Community Members: A Qualitative Secondary Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Fiona Grubin, Morgan E Neavill, Tessa Sawyer, Amanda Larson, Emily Maltaverne, Monica C Skewes\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/poq/nfaf030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Opioid use disorder and mortality due to opioid overdose pose significant public health problems in the United States, particularly among American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) communities that experience disproportionately high rates of opioid overdose deaths. Such health inequities are related to centuries of ongoing colonization and oppression that inform social determinants of health today. Using medications to treat opioid use disorder (MOUD) has broad support among health professionals due to substantial evidence of its effectiveness and benefits to patients. However, most AI/ANs who need MOUD never receive it. This analysis sought to identify concerns related to the use of MOUD and how they inform barriers to implementing MOUD in a rural AI reservation community. Secondary analysis of qualitative data was conducted using reflexive thematic analysis. Findings reveal key themes related to conditions for when to use MOUD, recovery, distrust of Western medicine, and individual viewpoints on MOUD. Implications of these findings for reducing barriers to MOUD in AI/AN communities are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51359,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Opinion Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"89 SI\",\"pages\":\"539-564\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12411911/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Opinion Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfaf030\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Opinion Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfaf030","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

阿片类药物使用障碍和因阿片类药物过量导致的死亡在美国构成了重大的公共卫生问题,特别是在阿片类药物过量死亡率过高的美洲印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民(AI/AN)社区。这种卫生不平等与几个世纪以来持续不断的殖民和压迫有关,这些因素构成了当今健康的社会决定因素。使用药物治疗阿片类药物使用障碍(mod)得到了卫生专业人员的广泛支持,因为有大量证据表明其有效性和对患者的益处。然而,大多数需要mod的AI/ANs从未收到它。本分析旨在确定与使用mod相关的问题,以及它们如何告知在农村人工智能保留地社区实施mod的障碍。采用反身性主题分析对定性数据进行二次分析。研究结果揭示了与使用mod的条件、康复、对西医的不信任以及个人对mod的看法有关的关键主题。本文讨论了这些发现对减少AI/AN社区中mod障碍的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Concerns About Medications for Opioid Use Disorder Among American Indian Community Members: A Qualitative Secondary Analysis.

Opioid use disorder and mortality due to opioid overdose pose significant public health problems in the United States, particularly among American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) communities that experience disproportionately high rates of opioid overdose deaths. Such health inequities are related to centuries of ongoing colonization and oppression that inform social determinants of health today. Using medications to treat opioid use disorder (MOUD) has broad support among health professionals due to substantial evidence of its effectiveness and benefits to patients. However, most AI/ANs who need MOUD never receive it. This analysis sought to identify concerns related to the use of MOUD and how they inform barriers to implementing MOUD in a rural AI reservation community. Secondary analysis of qualitative data was conducted using reflexive thematic analysis. Findings reveal key themes related to conditions for when to use MOUD, recovery, distrust of Western medicine, and individual viewpoints on MOUD. Implications of these findings for reducing barriers to MOUD in AI/AN communities are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
2.90%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: Published since 1937, Public Opinion Quarterly is among the most frequently cited journals of its kind. Such interdisciplinary leadership benefits academicians and all social science researchers by providing a trusted source for a wide range of high quality research. POQ selectively publishes important theoretical contributions to opinion and communication research, analyses of current public opinion, and investigations of methodological issues involved in survey validity—including questionnaire construction, interviewing and interviewers, sampling strategy, and mode of administration. The theoretical and methodological advances detailed in pages of POQ ensure its importance as a research resource.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信