{"title":"强迫症中奖赏加工的改变:来自主动学习和观察学习的见解。","authors":"Julian Vahedi, Armin Bahic, Irini Chaliani, Leonhard Schilbach, Burkhard Ciupka-Schön, Christian Bellebaum, Reinhard Pietrowsky, Jutta Peterburs","doi":"10.1111/psyp.70142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) has been associated with altered performance monitoring, reflected in enhanced amplitudes of the error-related negativity in the event-related potential. However, this is not specific to OCD, as overactive error processing is also evident in anxiety. Although similar neural mechanisms have been proposed for error and feedback processing, it remains unclear whether the processing of errors as indexed by external feedback, reflected in the feedback-related negativity (FRN), is altered in OCD. Likewise, it is currently unknown whether performance monitoring in OCD differs between learning from self-performed and observed outcomes. The present study compared OCD patients (n = 27) with healthy controls (HCs; n = 27) and patients with social anxiety disorder (SAD; n = 29) in an active and observational variant of a probabilistic feedback learning task while EEG was recorded. Compared to HCs, OCD patients showed generally impaired task performance across both active and observational learning, as well as more indecisive choice behavior. This was accompanied by generally more positive amplitudes of the FRN, with enhanced valence coding for active compared to observational learning, driven by more positive FRN amplitudes for wins. However, no differences were found for losses. Overall, these results suggest deficient reward-rather than punishment-processing in OCD. Similar performance monitoring alterations in OCD and SAD imply reliance on shared, disorder-general mechanisms. Possible candidates for these mechanisms, such as intolerance of uncertainty, pessimism, and depressiveness are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":20913,"journal":{"name":"Psychophysiology","volume":"62 9","pages":"e70142"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12415511/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Altered Reward Processing in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Insights From Active and Observational Learning.\",\"authors\":\"Julian Vahedi, Armin Bahic, Irini Chaliani, Leonhard Schilbach, Burkhard Ciupka-Schön, Christian Bellebaum, Reinhard Pietrowsky, Jutta Peterburs\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/psyp.70142\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) has been associated with altered performance monitoring, reflected in enhanced amplitudes of the error-related negativity in the event-related potential. However, this is not specific to OCD, as overactive error processing is also evident in anxiety. Although similar neural mechanisms have been proposed for error and feedback processing, it remains unclear whether the processing of errors as indexed by external feedback, reflected in the feedback-related negativity (FRN), is altered in OCD. Likewise, it is currently unknown whether performance monitoring in OCD differs between learning from self-performed and observed outcomes. The present study compared OCD patients (n = 27) with healthy controls (HCs; n = 27) and patients with social anxiety disorder (SAD; n = 29) in an active and observational variant of a probabilistic feedback learning task while EEG was recorded. Compared to HCs, OCD patients showed generally impaired task performance across both active and observational learning, as well as more indecisive choice behavior. This was accompanied by generally more positive amplitudes of the FRN, with enhanced valence coding for active compared to observational learning, driven by more positive FRN amplitudes for wins. However, no differences were found for losses. Overall, these results suggest deficient reward-rather than punishment-processing in OCD. Similar performance monitoring alterations in OCD and SAD imply reliance on shared, disorder-general mechanisms. Possible candidates for these mechanisms, such as intolerance of uncertainty, pessimism, and depressiveness are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20913,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychophysiology\",\"volume\":\"62 9\",\"pages\":\"e70142\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12415511/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.70142\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.70142","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
强迫症(OCD)与表现监测的改变有关,反映在事件相关电位中与错误相关的负性振幅的增强。然而,这并不是强迫症所特有的,因为过度活跃的错误处理在焦虑中也很明显。虽然错误和反馈处理的神经机制已经被提出,但目前尚不清楚强迫症是否会改变以反馈相关负性(FRN)为指标的外部反馈对错误的处理。同样,目前尚不清楚强迫症的绩效监测在自我学习和观察结果之间是否存在差异。本研究比较了强迫症患者(n = 27)与健康对照(hc; n = 27)和社交焦虑障碍患者(SAD; n = 29)在一个主动和观察性的概率反馈学习任务中进行脑电图记录。与hc相比,OCD患者在主动学习和观察学习方面的任务表现普遍受损,以及更多的优柔寡断的选择行为。这通常伴随着更积极的FRN振幅,与观察学习相比,积极学习的效价编码增强,这是由更积极的FRN振幅驱动的。然而,在损失方面没有发现差异。总的来说,这些结果表明强迫症患者的奖励处理缺陷,而不是惩罚处理缺陷。在OCD和SAD中,类似的表现监测变化意味着依赖于共享的、紊乱的一般机制。这些可能的候选机制,如对不确定性的不容忍,悲观和抑郁进行了讨论。
Altered Reward Processing in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Insights From Active and Observational Learning.
Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) has been associated with altered performance monitoring, reflected in enhanced amplitudes of the error-related negativity in the event-related potential. However, this is not specific to OCD, as overactive error processing is also evident in anxiety. Although similar neural mechanisms have been proposed for error and feedback processing, it remains unclear whether the processing of errors as indexed by external feedback, reflected in the feedback-related negativity (FRN), is altered in OCD. Likewise, it is currently unknown whether performance monitoring in OCD differs between learning from self-performed and observed outcomes. The present study compared OCD patients (n = 27) with healthy controls (HCs; n = 27) and patients with social anxiety disorder (SAD; n = 29) in an active and observational variant of a probabilistic feedback learning task while EEG was recorded. Compared to HCs, OCD patients showed generally impaired task performance across both active and observational learning, as well as more indecisive choice behavior. This was accompanied by generally more positive amplitudes of the FRN, with enhanced valence coding for active compared to observational learning, driven by more positive FRN amplitudes for wins. However, no differences were found for losses. Overall, these results suggest deficient reward-rather than punishment-processing in OCD. Similar performance monitoring alterations in OCD and SAD imply reliance on shared, disorder-general mechanisms. Possible candidates for these mechanisms, such as intolerance of uncertainty, pessimism, and depressiveness are discussed.
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1964, Psychophysiology is the most established journal in the world specifically dedicated to the dissemination of psychophysiological science. The journal continues to play a key role in advancing human neuroscience in its many forms and methodologies (including central and peripheral measures), covering research on the interrelationships between the physiological and psychological aspects of brain and behavior. Typically, studies published in Psychophysiology include psychological independent variables and noninvasive physiological dependent variables (hemodynamic, optical, and electromagnetic brain imaging and/or peripheral measures such as respiratory sinus arrhythmia, electromyography, pupillography, and many others). The majority of studies published in the journal involve human participants, but work using animal models of such phenomena is occasionally published. Psychophysiology welcomes submissions on new theoretical, empirical, and methodological advances in: cognitive, affective, clinical and social neuroscience, psychopathology and psychiatry, health science and behavioral medicine, and biomedical engineering. The journal publishes theoretical papers, evaluative reviews of literature, empirical papers, and methodological papers, with submissions welcome from scientists in any fields mentioned above.