心理因素对胸间和胸锯肌平面阻滞治疗乳房部分切除术后恢复效果的影响:一项随机对照试验。

IF 6.3 4区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Sung Yeon Ham, Jooyoung Oh, Ji Yeong Kim, Juyeong Park, Hye Sun Lee, Soong June Bae, Seung Ho Baek, Yoonwon Kook, Joon Jeong, Sung Gwe Ahn, Young Song
{"title":"心理因素对胸间和胸锯肌平面阻滞治疗乳房部分切除术后恢复效果的影响:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Sung Yeon Ham, Jooyoung Oh, Ji Yeong Kim, Juyeong Park, Hye Sun Lee, Soong June Bae, Seung Ho Baek, Yoonwon Kook, Joon Jeong, Sung Gwe Ahn, Young Song","doi":"10.4097/kja.24469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The interpectoral and pectoserratus plane (PECs) blocks have been reported to provide favorable postoperative analgesia after mastectomy. However, studies have reported controversial data regarding its effect on the quality of recovery (QoR). We aimed to evaluate the effect of the PECs block in light of baseline psychological factors and pain sensitivity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing partial mastectomy were randomly assigned to receive either a PECs block (PECs group, n = 69) or no block (control group, n = 70). We assessed the preoperative psychosocial factors and pain recognition using the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), Breast Cancer Pain Questionnaire (BCPQ), temporal pain summation (TPS), and pressure pain threshold and tolerance; we then conducted the interaction test to evaluate the moderating role of these factors on the efficacy of the PECs block.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The global QoR-15 score 1 d after surgery did not differ between the groups (136.50 [124.00, 144.00] vs. 141.00 [127.00, 148.00], P = 0.061); however, the score was enhanced in patients who were depressed, did not ruminate pain aberrantly, and did not have pre-existing pain. The pain Verbal Numeric Rating Scale (VNRS) 1 d after surgery was not different between the groups; however, the TPS score showed an interaction, indicating that the PECs block could reduce pain intensity in patients with high pain sensitivity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The PECs block did not enhance the QoR-15 score or pain intensity after mastectomy, but its efficacy was pronounced in patients with several specific emotional traits and pain perception.</p>","PeriodicalId":17855,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of psychological factors on the benefit from interpectoral and pectoserratus plane block for recovery after partial mastectomy: a randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Sung Yeon Ham, Jooyoung Oh, Ji Yeong Kim, Juyeong Park, Hye Sun Lee, Soong June Bae, Seung Ho Baek, Yoonwon Kook, Joon Jeong, Sung Gwe Ahn, Young Song\",\"doi\":\"10.4097/kja.24469\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The interpectoral and pectoserratus plane (PECs) blocks have been reported to provide favorable postoperative analgesia after mastectomy. However, studies have reported controversial data regarding its effect on the quality of recovery (QoR). We aimed to evaluate the effect of the PECs block in light of baseline psychological factors and pain sensitivity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing partial mastectomy were randomly assigned to receive either a PECs block (PECs group, n = 69) or no block (control group, n = 70). We assessed the preoperative psychosocial factors and pain recognition using the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), Breast Cancer Pain Questionnaire (BCPQ), temporal pain summation (TPS), and pressure pain threshold and tolerance; we then conducted the interaction test to evaluate the moderating role of these factors on the efficacy of the PECs block.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The global QoR-15 score 1 d after surgery did not differ between the groups (136.50 [124.00, 144.00] vs. 141.00 [127.00, 148.00], P = 0.061); however, the score was enhanced in patients who were depressed, did not ruminate pain aberrantly, and did not have pre-existing pain. The pain Verbal Numeric Rating Scale (VNRS) 1 d after surgery was not different between the groups; however, the TPS score showed an interaction, indicating that the PECs block could reduce pain intensity in patients with high pain sensitivity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The PECs block did not enhance the QoR-15 score or pain intensity after mastectomy, but its efficacy was pronounced in patients with several specific emotional traits and pain perception.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17855,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Journal of Anesthesiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Journal of Anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4097/kja.24469\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4097/kja.24469","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:据报道,胸间和胸锯肌平面(PECs)阻滞在乳房切除术后提供良好的术后镇痛。然而,关于其对恢复质量(QoR)的影响,研究报告了有争议的数据。我们的目的是根据基线心理因素和疼痛敏感性来评估PECs阻滞的效果。方法:接受乳房部分切除术的患者随机分为PECs阻滞组(PECs组,n = 69)和不阻滞组(对照组,n = 70)。采用医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)、疼痛灾难化量表(PCS)、乳腺癌疼痛问卷(BCPQ)、时间疼痛总和(TPS)、压力性疼痛阈值和耐忍度评估术前心理社会因素和疼痛认知;然后,我们进行了相互作用测试,以评估这些因素对PECs阻滞疗效的调节作用。结果:术后1 d整体QoR-15评分在两组间无差异(136.50 [124.00,144.00]vs. 141.00 [127.00, 148.00], P = 0.061);然而,抑郁、不反复思考疼痛、没有预先存在疼痛的患者得分更高。术后1 d疼痛言语数值评定量表(VNRS)组间差异无统计学意义;然而,TPS评分显示交互作用,表明PECs阻滞可以减轻高疼痛敏感性患者的疼痛强度。结论:PECs阻滞并没有提高乳房切除术后QoR-15评分或疼痛强度,但对具有几种特定情绪特征和疼痛感知的患者有明显的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Influence of psychological factors on the benefit from interpectoral and pectoserratus plane block for recovery after partial mastectomy: a randomized controlled trial.

Background: The interpectoral and pectoserratus plane (PECs) blocks have been reported to provide favorable postoperative analgesia after mastectomy. However, studies have reported controversial data regarding its effect on the quality of recovery (QoR). We aimed to evaluate the effect of the PECs block in light of baseline psychological factors and pain sensitivity.

Methods: Patients undergoing partial mastectomy were randomly assigned to receive either a PECs block (PECs group, n = 69) or no block (control group, n = 70). We assessed the preoperative psychosocial factors and pain recognition using the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), Breast Cancer Pain Questionnaire (BCPQ), temporal pain summation (TPS), and pressure pain threshold and tolerance; we then conducted the interaction test to evaluate the moderating role of these factors on the efficacy of the PECs block.

Results: The global QoR-15 score 1 d after surgery did not differ between the groups (136.50 [124.00, 144.00] vs. 141.00 [127.00, 148.00], P = 0.061); however, the score was enhanced in patients who were depressed, did not ruminate pain aberrantly, and did not have pre-existing pain. The pain Verbal Numeric Rating Scale (VNRS) 1 d after surgery was not different between the groups; however, the TPS score showed an interaction, indicating that the PECs block could reduce pain intensity in patients with high pain sensitivity.

Conclusions: The PECs block did not enhance the QoR-15 score or pain intensity after mastectomy, but its efficacy was pronounced in patients with several specific emotional traits and pain perception.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
6.90%
发文量
84
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信