心脏核成像工作人员:医疗保险B部分趋势(2013-2022)。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Maria Alwan, Ahmad El Yaman, Ahmed Sayed, Asim Shaikh, Phillips M Lawrence, Mahmoud Al Rifai, Mouaz H Al-Mallah
{"title":"心脏核成像工作人员:医疗保险B部分趋势(2013-2022)。","authors":"Maria Alwan, Ahmad El Yaman, Ahmed Sayed, Asim Shaikh, Phillips M Lawrence, Mahmoud Al Rifai, Mouaz H Al-Mallah","doi":"10.1016/j.nuclcard.2025.102472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiac positron emission tomography (PET) and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) are widely used for the assessment of coronary artery disease. While SPECT remains more available, workforce shortages and training demands contribute to geographic disparities in PET availability, impacting patient access to advanced imaging. Therefore, we assessed trends in the U.S. cardiac nuclear imaging workforce.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from Medicare Part B (2013-2022), provided by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, were analyzed to assess trends in cardiac nuclear imaging services billed by physicians. The analysis focused on the number of readers, their gender, specialty, geographic distribution, and workload.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2013 to 2022, the proportion of SPECT procedures declined from 95.8% (2,303,194 scans; 4393 per 100,000 Medicare beneficiaries) to 86.3% (1,386,358 scans; 2130 per 100,000 Medicare beneficiaries) of total nuclear cardiology procedures, while the proportion of PET procedures increased from 4.2% (99,861 scans; 190 per 100,000 Medicare beneficiaries) to 13.7% (220,366 scans; 339 per 100,000 Medicare beneficiaries). The majority of studies were interpreted by readers performing 50 or more studies annually. From 2013 to 2022, the number of SPECT-only readers declined from 17,013 to 13,491, while PET-only readers increased from 66 to 386. Readers interpreting both SPECT and PET doubled from 822 to 1643. Only 1 in 10 nuclear imaging readers were women and the majority were cardiologists. The median (interquartile range) number of studies per reader was higher for cardiologists compared to those of other specialties. Geographic disparities were evident, with most nuclear imaging readers practicing in Texas, Florida, and California, while the fewest were in Wyoming, Alaska, Vermont, and Washington, D.C.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While SPECT remained the most commonly used modality in 2022, its use has declined, whereas PET use has increased, accompanied by similar trends in the number of readers. Gender and geographic disparities persist in the distribution of nuclear cardiology imaging specialists. Addressing these gaps is essential to ensuring equitable access to nuclear imaging expertise.</p>","PeriodicalId":16476,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nuclear Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"102472"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cardiac nuclear imaging workforce: Trends from Medicare Part B (2013-2022).\",\"authors\":\"Maria Alwan, Ahmad El Yaman, Ahmed Sayed, Asim Shaikh, Phillips M Lawrence, Mahmoud Al Rifai, Mouaz H Al-Mallah\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nuclcard.2025.102472\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiac positron emission tomography (PET) and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) are widely used for the assessment of coronary artery disease. While SPECT remains more available, workforce shortages and training demands contribute to geographic disparities in PET availability, impacting patient access to advanced imaging. Therefore, we assessed trends in the U.S. cardiac nuclear imaging workforce.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from Medicare Part B (2013-2022), provided by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, were analyzed to assess trends in cardiac nuclear imaging services billed by physicians. The analysis focused on the number of readers, their gender, specialty, geographic distribution, and workload.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2013 to 2022, the proportion of SPECT procedures declined from 95.8% (2,303,194 scans; 4393 per 100,000 Medicare beneficiaries) to 86.3% (1,386,358 scans; 2130 per 100,000 Medicare beneficiaries) of total nuclear cardiology procedures, while the proportion of PET procedures increased from 4.2% (99,861 scans; 190 per 100,000 Medicare beneficiaries) to 13.7% (220,366 scans; 339 per 100,000 Medicare beneficiaries). The majority of studies were interpreted by readers performing 50 or more studies annually. From 2013 to 2022, the number of SPECT-only readers declined from 17,013 to 13,491, while PET-only readers increased from 66 to 386. Readers interpreting both SPECT and PET doubled from 822 to 1643. Only 1 in 10 nuclear imaging readers were women and the majority were cardiologists. The median (interquartile range) number of studies per reader was higher for cardiologists compared to those of other specialties. Geographic disparities were evident, with most nuclear imaging readers practicing in Texas, Florida, and California, while the fewest were in Wyoming, Alaska, Vermont, and Washington, D.C.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While SPECT remained the most commonly used modality in 2022, its use has declined, whereas PET use has increased, accompanied by similar trends in the number of readers. Gender and geographic disparities persist in the distribution of nuclear cardiology imaging specialists. Addressing these gaps is essential to ensuring equitable access to nuclear imaging expertise.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16476,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nuclear Cardiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"102472\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nuclear Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclcard.2025.102472\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nuclear Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclcard.2025.102472","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:心脏正电子发射断层扫描(PET)和单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)被广泛用于评估冠状动脉疾病。虽然SPECT仍然更容易获得,但劳动力短缺和培训需求导致PET可用性的地理差异,影响了患者获得高级成像的机会。因此,我们评估了美国心脏核成像工作人员的趋势。方法:对医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心提供的医疗保险B部分(2013-2022)数据进行分析,以评估医生计费的心脏核成像服务的趋势。分析的重点是读者的数量、性别、专业、地理分布和工作量。结果:从2013年到2022年,核心学手术中SPECT的比例从95.8%(2,303,194次扫描,4393次/ 10万医保受益人)下降到86.3%(1,386,358次扫描,2130次/ 10万医保受益人),而PET的比例从4.2%(99,861次扫描,190次/ 10万医保受益人)上升到13.7%(220,366次扫描,339次/ 10万医保受益人)。大多数研究是由每年进行50次或更多研究的读者进行解释的。从2013年到2022年,纯spect阅读器的数量从17013个下降到13491个,而纯pet阅读器的数量从66个增加到386个。同时解读SPECT和PET的读者从822人增加到1643人。只有十分之一的核成像阅读者是女性,大多数是心脏病专家。与其他专业相比,心脏病专家的每位读者的研究中位数(四分位数范围)更高。地理差异很明显,大多数核成像阅读器在德克萨斯州、佛罗里达州和加利福尼亚州使用,而怀俄明州、阿拉斯加州、佛蒙特州和华盛顿特区使用最少。结论:虽然SPECT在2022年仍然是最常用的方式,但它的使用有所下降,而PET的使用有所增加,同时伴随着阅读器数量的类似趋势。性别和地理差异仍然存在于核心学成像专家的分布中。解决这些差距对于确保公平获得核成像专业知识至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cardiac nuclear imaging workforce: Trends from Medicare Part B (2013-2022).

Background: Cardiac positron emission tomography (PET) and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) are widely used for the assessment of coronary artery disease. While SPECT remains more available, workforce shortages and training demands contribute to geographic disparities in PET availability, impacting patient access to advanced imaging. Therefore, we assessed trends in the U.S. cardiac nuclear imaging workforce.

Methods: Data from Medicare Part B (2013-2022), provided by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, were analyzed to assess trends in cardiac nuclear imaging services billed by physicians. The analysis focused on the number of readers, their gender, specialty, geographic distribution, and workload.

Results: From 2013 to 2022, the proportion of SPECT procedures declined from 95.8% (2,303,194 scans; 4393 per 100,000 Medicare beneficiaries) to 86.3% (1,386,358 scans; 2130 per 100,000 Medicare beneficiaries) of total nuclear cardiology procedures, while the proportion of PET procedures increased from 4.2% (99,861 scans; 190 per 100,000 Medicare beneficiaries) to 13.7% (220,366 scans; 339 per 100,000 Medicare beneficiaries). The majority of studies were interpreted by readers performing 50 or more studies annually. From 2013 to 2022, the number of SPECT-only readers declined from 17,013 to 13,491, while PET-only readers increased from 66 to 386. Readers interpreting both SPECT and PET doubled from 822 to 1643. Only 1 in 10 nuclear imaging readers were women and the majority were cardiologists. The median (interquartile range) number of studies per reader was higher for cardiologists compared to those of other specialties. Geographic disparities were evident, with most nuclear imaging readers practicing in Texas, Florida, and California, while the fewest were in Wyoming, Alaska, Vermont, and Washington, D.C.

Conclusions: While SPECT remained the most commonly used modality in 2022, its use has declined, whereas PET use has increased, accompanied by similar trends in the number of readers. Gender and geographic disparities persist in the distribution of nuclear cardiology imaging specialists. Addressing these gaps is essential to ensuring equitable access to nuclear imaging expertise.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
20.80%
发文量
249
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Nuclear Cardiology is the only journal in the world devoted to this dynamic and growing subspecialty. Physicians and technologists value the Journal not only for its peer-reviewed articles, but also for its timely discussions about the current and future role of nuclear cardiology. Original articles address all aspects of nuclear cardiology, including interpretation, diagnosis, imaging equipment, and use of radiopharmaceuticals. As the official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the Journal also brings readers the latest information emerging from the Society''s task forces and publishes guidelines and position papers as they are adopted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信