Tilman E. Klassert , Jenny Fiebig , Cristina Zubiria-Barrera , Ludwig Wurschi , Robert Neubert , Annika Döding , Ulrike Schulze-Späte , Hortense Slevogt
{"title":"口腔微生物组研究中核酸保存方案的评价。","authors":"Tilman E. Klassert , Jenny Fiebig , Cristina Zubiria-Barrera , Ludwig Wurschi , Robert Neubert , Annika Döding , Ulrike Schulze-Späte , Hortense Slevogt","doi":"10.1016/j.mimet.2025.107248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The accuracy of oral microbiome research depends significantly on specimen sampling protocols, as well as their storage and preservation. Traditional methods, such as freezing, may not only involve logistical hurdles but can also impact the quality of microbial data, leading to difficulties in the comparability between different studies. This study evaluates the effectiveness of the room temperature nucleic acid preservation protocol using DNA/RNA Shield buffer as compared to standard freezing in preserving oral microbial communities over the course of 7 days.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Comparative analyses based on 16S rRNA gene sequencing revealed a high overall consistency between the microbiome data retrieved by both preservation strategies. In terms of DNA yield, qPCR analysis showed a significant increase in bacterial DNA recovered from tongue swabs, dental pockets and saliva samples when using DNA/RNA Shield. In the taxonomic analyses, the Shield buffer preserved a higher abundance of <em>Veillonella</em> as compared to freezing. However, the compositional data was highly comparable between both protocols for all other taxonomic groups. While no major differences in microbial diversity were observed between both preservation methods for most samples, saliva samples stored in DNA/RNA Shield exhibited significantly higher diversity. Both preservation methods performed in a highly comparable manner in their ability to retrieve consistent biological readouts, such as site-specificity and health status.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Storing oral samples at room temperature in DNA/RNA Shield buffer provides a reliable and efficient alternative to freezing for preserving microbiome samples. Furthermore, it may enhance DNA yield while preserving microbial diversity in the samples.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16409,"journal":{"name":"Journal of microbiological methods","volume":"237 ","pages":"Article 107248"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of a nucleic acid preservation protocol for microbiome studies involving samples from the oral cavity\",\"authors\":\"Tilman E. Klassert , Jenny Fiebig , Cristina Zubiria-Barrera , Ludwig Wurschi , Robert Neubert , Annika Döding , Ulrike Schulze-Späte , Hortense Slevogt\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mimet.2025.107248\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The accuracy of oral microbiome research depends significantly on specimen sampling protocols, as well as their storage and preservation. Traditional methods, such as freezing, may not only involve logistical hurdles but can also impact the quality of microbial data, leading to difficulties in the comparability between different studies. This study evaluates the effectiveness of the room temperature nucleic acid preservation protocol using DNA/RNA Shield buffer as compared to standard freezing in preserving oral microbial communities over the course of 7 days.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Comparative analyses based on 16S rRNA gene sequencing revealed a high overall consistency between the microbiome data retrieved by both preservation strategies. In terms of DNA yield, qPCR analysis showed a significant increase in bacterial DNA recovered from tongue swabs, dental pockets and saliva samples when using DNA/RNA Shield. In the taxonomic analyses, the Shield buffer preserved a higher abundance of <em>Veillonella</em> as compared to freezing. However, the compositional data was highly comparable between both protocols for all other taxonomic groups. While no major differences in microbial diversity were observed between both preservation methods for most samples, saliva samples stored in DNA/RNA Shield exhibited significantly higher diversity. Both preservation methods performed in a highly comparable manner in their ability to retrieve consistent biological readouts, such as site-specificity and health status.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Storing oral samples at room temperature in DNA/RNA Shield buffer provides a reliable and efficient alternative to freezing for preserving microbiome samples. Furthermore, it may enhance DNA yield while preserving microbial diversity in the samples.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16409,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of microbiological methods\",\"volume\":\"237 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107248\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of microbiological methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167701225001642\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of microbiological methods","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167701225001642","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of a nucleic acid preservation protocol for microbiome studies involving samples from the oral cavity
Purpose
The accuracy of oral microbiome research depends significantly on specimen sampling protocols, as well as their storage and preservation. Traditional methods, such as freezing, may not only involve logistical hurdles but can also impact the quality of microbial data, leading to difficulties in the comparability between different studies. This study evaluates the effectiveness of the room temperature nucleic acid preservation protocol using DNA/RNA Shield buffer as compared to standard freezing in preserving oral microbial communities over the course of 7 days.
Results
Comparative analyses based on 16S rRNA gene sequencing revealed a high overall consistency between the microbiome data retrieved by both preservation strategies. In terms of DNA yield, qPCR analysis showed a significant increase in bacterial DNA recovered from tongue swabs, dental pockets and saliva samples when using DNA/RNA Shield. In the taxonomic analyses, the Shield buffer preserved a higher abundance of Veillonella as compared to freezing. However, the compositional data was highly comparable between both protocols for all other taxonomic groups. While no major differences in microbial diversity were observed between both preservation methods for most samples, saliva samples stored in DNA/RNA Shield exhibited significantly higher diversity. Both preservation methods performed in a highly comparable manner in their ability to retrieve consistent biological readouts, such as site-specificity and health status.
Conclusion
Storing oral samples at room temperature in DNA/RNA Shield buffer provides a reliable and efficient alternative to freezing for preserving microbiome samples. Furthermore, it may enhance DNA yield while preserving microbial diversity in the samples.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Microbiological Methods publishes scholarly and original articles, notes and review articles. These articles must include novel and/or state-of-the-art methods, or significant improvements to existing methods. Novel and innovative applications of current methods that are validated and useful will also be published. JMM strives for scholarship, innovation and excellence. This demands scientific rigour, the best available methods and technologies, correctly replicated experiments/tests, the inclusion of proper controls, calibrations, and the correct statistical analysis. The presentation of the data must support the interpretation of the method/approach.
All aspects of microbiology are covered, except virology. These include agricultural microbiology, applied and environmental microbiology, bioassays, bioinformatics, biotechnology, biochemical microbiology, clinical microbiology, diagnostics, food monitoring and quality control microbiology, microbial genetics and genomics, geomicrobiology, microbiome methods regardless of habitat, high through-put sequencing methods and analysis, microbial pathogenesis and host responses, metabolomics, metagenomics, metaproteomics, microbial ecology and diversity, microbial physiology, microbial ultra-structure, microscopic and imaging methods, molecular microbiology, mycology, novel mathematical microbiology and modelling, parasitology, plant-microbe interactions, protein markers/profiles, proteomics, pyrosequencing, public health microbiology, radioisotopes applied to microbiology, robotics applied to microbiological methods,rumen microbiology, microbiological methods for space missions and extreme environments, sampling methods and samplers, soil and sediment microbiology, transcriptomics, veterinary microbiology, sero-diagnostics and typing/identification.