多重聚合酶链反应与复杂食品基质的检测:大肠杆菌和沙门氏菌的初步研究。

IF 1.9 4区 生物学 Q4 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Stéphanie Watier-Grillot , Christian Sauvageot , Evelyne Thiébaut , Vincent Pommier de Santi , Aurélie Chesnay
{"title":"多重聚合酶链反应与复杂食品基质的检测:大肠杆菌和沙门氏菌的初步研究。","authors":"Stéphanie Watier-Grillot ,&nbsp;Christian Sauvageot ,&nbsp;Evelyne Thiébaut ,&nbsp;Vincent Pommier de Santi ,&nbsp;Aurélie Chesnay","doi":"10.1016/j.mimet.2025.107251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Foodborne diseases are caused by various pathogens and generally present with similar symptoms, mainly digestive disorders. Adopting a syndromic approach is therefore important when investigating foodborne disease outbreaks. This involves using multiplex PCR-based methods to test stool and food samples. In this study, the BioFire® FilmArray® Gastrointestinal Panel (BF-GIP) was evaluated as an alternative food microbiology method, in compliance with the ISO 16140-2 standard. We tested 205 naturally and artificially-contaminated mixed salad samples for <em>Escherichia</em> (<em>E.</em>) <em>coli</em> and <em>Salmonella</em> spp., comparing the results with BF-GIP and culture-based reference methods. For <em>Salmonella</em> spp., BF-GIP sensitivity was 100 % and the rate of false positives was 2.4 %, suggesting a good specificity. For <em>E. coli,</em> BF-GIP sensitivity was 92.9 %, with no significant difference from the reference method sensitivity. Shortcomings were highlighted for the accurate identification of <em>E. coli</em> strains artificially inoculated in food samples, with error percentages of 14 % and 9 % for the inclusivity and exclusivity studies respectively. BF-GIP is a suitable alternative method for the screening of <em>Salmonella</em> spp. and <em>E. coli</em> in complex food matrices, notably when investigating foodborne disease outbreaks. However, due to a lack of specificity, the determination of the <em>E. coli</em> strain(s) needs to be confirmed by a reference method.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16409,"journal":{"name":"Journal of microbiological methods","volume":"237 ","pages":"Article 107251"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multiplex polymerase chain reaction and testing of complex food matrices: A preliminary study on E. coli and Salmonella spp\",\"authors\":\"Stéphanie Watier-Grillot ,&nbsp;Christian Sauvageot ,&nbsp;Evelyne Thiébaut ,&nbsp;Vincent Pommier de Santi ,&nbsp;Aurélie Chesnay\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mimet.2025.107251\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Foodborne diseases are caused by various pathogens and generally present with similar symptoms, mainly digestive disorders. Adopting a syndromic approach is therefore important when investigating foodborne disease outbreaks. This involves using multiplex PCR-based methods to test stool and food samples. In this study, the BioFire® FilmArray® Gastrointestinal Panel (BF-GIP) was evaluated as an alternative food microbiology method, in compliance with the ISO 16140-2 standard. We tested 205 naturally and artificially-contaminated mixed salad samples for <em>Escherichia</em> (<em>E.</em>) <em>coli</em> and <em>Salmonella</em> spp., comparing the results with BF-GIP and culture-based reference methods. For <em>Salmonella</em> spp., BF-GIP sensitivity was 100 % and the rate of false positives was 2.4 %, suggesting a good specificity. For <em>E. coli,</em> BF-GIP sensitivity was 92.9 %, with no significant difference from the reference method sensitivity. Shortcomings were highlighted for the accurate identification of <em>E. coli</em> strains artificially inoculated in food samples, with error percentages of 14 % and 9 % for the inclusivity and exclusivity studies respectively. BF-GIP is a suitable alternative method for the screening of <em>Salmonella</em> spp. and <em>E. coli</em> in complex food matrices, notably when investigating foodborne disease outbreaks. However, due to a lack of specificity, the determination of the <em>E. coli</em> strain(s) needs to be confirmed by a reference method.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16409,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of microbiological methods\",\"volume\":\"237 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107251\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of microbiological methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167701225001678\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of microbiological methods","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167701225001678","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

食源性疾病由多种病原体引起,通常表现出相似的症状,主要是消化系统疾病。因此,在调查食源性疾病暴发时,采用综合征方法非常重要。这包括使用基于多重pcr的方法来检测粪便和食物样本。在本研究中,BioFire®FilmArray®胃肠道面板(BF-GIP)作为一种替代食品微生物学方法进行了评估,符合ISO 16140-2标准。我们对205份自然污染和人工污染的混合沙拉样品进行了大肠杆菌和沙门氏菌的检测,并将结果与BF-GIP和基于培养的参考方法进行了比较。对于沙门氏菌,BF-GIP的敏感性为100 %,假阳性率为2.4 %,具有良好的特异性。对于大肠杆菌,BF-GIP的灵敏度为92.9 %,与参考方法的灵敏度无显著差异。在食品样品中人工接种大肠杆菌菌株的准确鉴定方面存在不足,包容性研究和排他性研究的错误率分别为14 %和9 %。BF-GIP是在复杂食物基质中筛选沙门氏菌和大肠杆菌的合适替代方法,特别是在调查食源性疾病暴发时。然而,由于缺乏特异性,大肠杆菌菌株的测定需要通过参考方法进行确认。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multiplex polymerase chain reaction and testing of complex food matrices: A preliminary study on E. coli and Salmonella spp
Foodborne diseases are caused by various pathogens and generally present with similar symptoms, mainly digestive disorders. Adopting a syndromic approach is therefore important when investigating foodborne disease outbreaks. This involves using multiplex PCR-based methods to test stool and food samples. In this study, the BioFire® FilmArray® Gastrointestinal Panel (BF-GIP) was evaluated as an alternative food microbiology method, in compliance with the ISO 16140-2 standard. We tested 205 naturally and artificially-contaminated mixed salad samples for Escherichia (E.) coli and Salmonella spp., comparing the results with BF-GIP and culture-based reference methods. For Salmonella spp., BF-GIP sensitivity was 100 % and the rate of false positives was 2.4 %, suggesting a good specificity. For E. coli, BF-GIP sensitivity was 92.9 %, with no significant difference from the reference method sensitivity. Shortcomings were highlighted for the accurate identification of E. coli strains artificially inoculated in food samples, with error percentages of 14 % and 9 % for the inclusivity and exclusivity studies respectively. BF-GIP is a suitable alternative method for the screening of Salmonella spp. and E. coli in complex food matrices, notably when investigating foodborne disease outbreaks. However, due to a lack of specificity, the determination of the E. coli strain(s) needs to be confirmed by a reference method.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of microbiological methods
Journal of microbiological methods 生物-生化研究方法
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.50%
发文量
151
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Microbiological Methods publishes scholarly and original articles, notes and review articles. These articles must include novel and/or state-of-the-art methods, or significant improvements to existing methods. Novel and innovative applications of current methods that are validated and useful will also be published. JMM strives for scholarship, innovation and excellence. This demands scientific rigour, the best available methods and technologies, correctly replicated experiments/tests, the inclusion of proper controls, calibrations, and the correct statistical analysis. The presentation of the data must support the interpretation of the method/approach. All aspects of microbiology are covered, except virology. These include agricultural microbiology, applied and environmental microbiology, bioassays, bioinformatics, biotechnology, biochemical microbiology, clinical microbiology, diagnostics, food monitoring and quality control microbiology, microbial genetics and genomics, geomicrobiology, microbiome methods regardless of habitat, high through-put sequencing methods and analysis, microbial pathogenesis and host responses, metabolomics, metagenomics, metaproteomics, microbial ecology and diversity, microbial physiology, microbial ultra-structure, microscopic and imaging methods, molecular microbiology, mycology, novel mathematical microbiology and modelling, parasitology, plant-microbe interactions, protein markers/profiles, proteomics, pyrosequencing, public health microbiology, radioisotopes applied to microbiology, robotics applied to microbiological methods,rumen microbiology, microbiological methods for space missions and extreme environments, sampling methods and samplers, soil and sediment microbiology, transcriptomics, veterinary microbiology, sero-diagnostics and typing/identification.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信