学术顾问绩效评估问卷的设计与心理测量。

IF 1.3 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Journal of Education and Health Promotion Pub Date : 2025-07-31 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.4103/jehp.jehp_119_24
Fatemeh Abbaszadeh, Forough Faroughi, Neda Jamali, Mahboobeh Kafaei Atrian, Saeideh Nasiri
{"title":"学术顾问绩效评估问卷的设计与心理测量。","authors":"Fatemeh Abbaszadeh, Forough Faroughi, Neda Jamali, Mahboobeh Kafaei Atrian, Saeideh Nasiri","doi":"10.4103/jehp.jehp_119_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Students are facing issues that can affect their academic performance. Therefore, they need to receive counseling services through guidance professors. This research was conducted with the aim of designing and psychometrics assessing the performance evaluation questionnaire of the academic advisor from the perspective of the academic advisor and student.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The current research was done in two stages including instrument design and psychometric evaluation at Kashan University of Medical Sciences in 2022. In the first stage, using the last edition of the consultant's regulations, two primary questionnaires were designed: \"Evaluation of the academic advisor performance from the perspective of the academic advisor\" and \"evaluation of the consultant's performance from the student viewpoint.\" In the second stage, the reduction of overlapping items and questionnaire validation were performed using validity of face and content and reliability calculation (Cronbach's alpha and intra-cluster correlation coefficient index [ICC]). Exploratory factor analysis was performed to assess construct validity. Data analysis was done with Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 22.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The initial version of both tools had 45 items. The tool for evaluating the performance of the academic advisor from the student's point of view has five dimensions (educational and disciplinary, student and job opportunities, teacher's behavioral domain, lesson planning, and student guidance in special cases) and 36 items, and Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation coefficient index were, respectively, 0.908 and 0.912. After performing factor analysis, five factors with 36 items explained 79.52% of the total variance of the instrument. Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation coefficient were 0.936 and 0.949, respectively. The total content validity of the questionnaire (S-CVI) was 0.92.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The academic advisor performance evaluation questionnaire that was designed and psychometrically evaluated in this study is a valid and reliable questionnaire for evaluating the performance of academic advisors and has an easy-to-use scale.</p>","PeriodicalId":15581,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education and Health Promotion","volume":"14 ","pages":"291"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12413130/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Designing and psychometrics of the academic advisor's performance evaluation questionnaire.\",\"authors\":\"Fatemeh Abbaszadeh, Forough Faroughi, Neda Jamali, Mahboobeh Kafaei Atrian, Saeideh Nasiri\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jehp.jehp_119_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Students are facing issues that can affect their academic performance. Therefore, they need to receive counseling services through guidance professors. This research was conducted with the aim of designing and psychometrics assessing the performance evaluation questionnaire of the academic advisor from the perspective of the academic advisor and student.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The current research was done in two stages including instrument design and psychometric evaluation at Kashan University of Medical Sciences in 2022. In the first stage, using the last edition of the consultant's regulations, two primary questionnaires were designed: \\\"Evaluation of the academic advisor performance from the perspective of the academic advisor\\\" and \\\"evaluation of the consultant's performance from the student viewpoint.\\\" In the second stage, the reduction of overlapping items and questionnaire validation were performed using validity of face and content and reliability calculation (Cronbach's alpha and intra-cluster correlation coefficient index [ICC]). Exploratory factor analysis was performed to assess construct validity. Data analysis was done with Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 22.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The initial version of both tools had 45 items. The tool for evaluating the performance of the academic advisor from the student's point of view has five dimensions (educational and disciplinary, student and job opportunities, teacher's behavioral domain, lesson planning, and student guidance in special cases) and 36 items, and Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation coefficient index were, respectively, 0.908 and 0.912. After performing factor analysis, five factors with 36 items explained 79.52% of the total variance of the instrument. Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation coefficient were 0.936 and 0.949, respectively. The total content validity of the questionnaire (S-CVI) was 0.92.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The academic advisor performance evaluation questionnaire that was designed and psychometrically evaluated in this study is a valid and reliable questionnaire for evaluating the performance of academic advisors and has an easy-to-use scale.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15581,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Education and Health Promotion\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"291\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12413130/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Education and Health Promotion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_119_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education and Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_119_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:学生们正面临着可能影响他们学习成绩的问题。因此,他们需要通过指导教授接受咨询服务。本研究旨在从学术顾问和学生的角度对学术顾问绩效评估问卷进行设计和心理测量学评估。材料与方法:目前的研究于2022年在卡山医科大学进行,分为仪器设计和心理测量评估两个阶段。在第一阶段,使用最新版的顾问条例,设计了两个主要的问卷:“从学术顾问的角度评价学术顾问的绩效”和“从学生的角度评价学术顾问的绩效”。在第二阶段,使用面孔和内容效度和信度计算(Cronbach's alpha和聚类内相关系数指数[ICC])进行重叠项的减少和问卷验证。探索性因子分析评估构念效度。数据分析使用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)软件版本22完成。结果:两个工具的初始版本都有45个项目。从学生角度评价学术顾问绩效的工具有5个维度(教育与学科、学生与工作机会、教师行为领域、课程规划和特殊情况下的学生指导)36个项目,Cronbach’s alpha和班级内相关系数指数分别为0.908和0.912。经因子分析,5个因子共36项解释了仪器总方差的79.52%。Cronbach’s alpha和类内相关系数分别为0.936和0.949。问卷的总内容效度(S-CVI)为0.92。结论:本研究设计的学术顾问绩效评价问卷经心理计量学评估,是一份有效、可靠的学术顾问绩效评价问卷,量表易于使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Designing and psychometrics of the academic advisor's performance evaluation questionnaire.

Designing and psychometrics of the academic advisor's performance evaluation questionnaire.

Background: Students are facing issues that can affect their academic performance. Therefore, they need to receive counseling services through guidance professors. This research was conducted with the aim of designing and psychometrics assessing the performance evaluation questionnaire of the academic advisor from the perspective of the academic advisor and student.

Materials and methods: The current research was done in two stages including instrument design and psychometric evaluation at Kashan University of Medical Sciences in 2022. In the first stage, using the last edition of the consultant's regulations, two primary questionnaires were designed: "Evaluation of the academic advisor performance from the perspective of the academic advisor" and "evaluation of the consultant's performance from the student viewpoint." In the second stage, the reduction of overlapping items and questionnaire validation were performed using validity of face and content and reliability calculation (Cronbach's alpha and intra-cluster correlation coefficient index [ICC]). Exploratory factor analysis was performed to assess construct validity. Data analysis was done with Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 22.

Results: The initial version of both tools had 45 items. The tool for evaluating the performance of the academic advisor from the student's point of view has five dimensions (educational and disciplinary, student and job opportunities, teacher's behavioral domain, lesson planning, and student guidance in special cases) and 36 items, and Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation coefficient index were, respectively, 0.908 and 0.912. After performing factor analysis, five factors with 36 items explained 79.52% of the total variance of the instrument. Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation coefficient were 0.936 and 0.949, respectively. The total content validity of the questionnaire (S-CVI) was 0.92.

Conclusions: The academic advisor performance evaluation questionnaire that was designed and psychometrically evaluated in this study is a valid and reliable questionnaire for evaluating the performance of academic advisors and has an easy-to-use scale.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
218
审稿时长
34 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信