Philip Yu, Carl Zhou, Stanley Wong, Andrew T Olagunju
{"title":"丁螺环酮和坦多螺环酮的问题使用:范围审查。","authors":"Philip Yu, Carl Zhou, Stanley Wong, Andrew T Olagunju","doi":"10.1097/ADM.0000000000001581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Azapirone-class drugs are partial 5-HT1A receptor agonists commonly used to treat anxiety disorders. Prior experimental studies have so far demonstrated that these drugs have low potential for dependence and problematic use and are considered safe treatment options compared with benzodiazepines. However, recent evidence suggesting the contrary raises concerns about their safety. This review examines current evidence on problematic azapirone use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was conducted in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. Major databases, including MEDLINE/PubMed, PsycInfo, and EMBASE, were searched to identify eligible papers. Additional searches were conducted to supplement. Article selection and data extraction were completed by at least 2 independent reviewers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen reports made up of clinical studies (n = 9) and case reports (n = 4) were included. All abuse liability studies comparing azapirones (buspirone and tandospirone), benzodiazepines, and placebo reported no association of buspirone and tandospirone with key features of problematic use. Conversely, all case reports (n = 4) described problematic use, involving patients with a history of incarceration or substance use disorder (SUD) who insufflated buspirone to achieve a sedative effect.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings highlight a discrepancy in the primary literature. Specifically, experimental studies conclude that so far, buspirone and tandospirone have a low potential for problematic use. However, more recent case reports document instances of nonprescribed buspirone misuse, particularly among individuals with a history of incarceration or SUD, possibly stemming from a complex interplay of biopsychosocial-behavioral rather than purely pharmacological factors. Further research is needed to guide strategies for preventing problematic azapirone use while ensuring effective anxiety treatment in high-risk populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":14744,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Addiction Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Problematic Use of Buspirone and Tandospirone: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Philip Yu, Carl Zhou, Stanley Wong, Andrew T Olagunju\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ADM.0000000000001581\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Azapirone-class drugs are partial 5-HT1A receptor agonists commonly used to treat anxiety disorders. Prior experimental studies have so far demonstrated that these drugs have low potential for dependence and problematic use and are considered safe treatment options compared with benzodiazepines. However, recent evidence suggesting the contrary raises concerns about their safety. This review examines current evidence on problematic azapirone use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was conducted in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. Major databases, including MEDLINE/PubMed, PsycInfo, and EMBASE, were searched to identify eligible papers. Additional searches were conducted to supplement. Article selection and data extraction were completed by at least 2 independent reviewers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen reports made up of clinical studies (n = 9) and case reports (n = 4) were included. All abuse liability studies comparing azapirones (buspirone and tandospirone), benzodiazepines, and placebo reported no association of buspirone and tandospirone with key features of problematic use. Conversely, all case reports (n = 4) described problematic use, involving patients with a history of incarceration or substance use disorder (SUD) who insufflated buspirone to achieve a sedative effect.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings highlight a discrepancy in the primary literature. Specifically, experimental studies conclude that so far, buspirone and tandospirone have a low potential for problematic use. However, more recent case reports document instances of nonprescribed buspirone misuse, particularly among individuals with a history of incarceration or SUD, possibly stemming from a complex interplay of biopsychosocial-behavioral rather than purely pharmacological factors. Further research is needed to guide strategies for preventing problematic azapirone use while ensuring effective anxiety treatment in high-risk populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14744,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Addiction Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Addiction Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ADM.0000000000001581\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Addiction Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ADM.0000000000001581","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Problematic Use of Buspirone and Tandospirone: A Scoping Review.
Objectives: Azapirone-class drugs are partial 5-HT1A receptor agonists commonly used to treat anxiety disorders. Prior experimental studies have so far demonstrated that these drugs have low potential for dependence and problematic use and are considered safe treatment options compared with benzodiazepines. However, recent evidence suggesting the contrary raises concerns about their safety. This review examines current evidence on problematic azapirone use.
Methods: This study was conducted in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. Major databases, including MEDLINE/PubMed, PsycInfo, and EMBASE, were searched to identify eligible papers. Additional searches were conducted to supplement. Article selection and data extraction were completed by at least 2 independent reviewers.
Results: Thirteen reports made up of clinical studies (n = 9) and case reports (n = 4) were included. All abuse liability studies comparing azapirones (buspirone and tandospirone), benzodiazepines, and placebo reported no association of buspirone and tandospirone with key features of problematic use. Conversely, all case reports (n = 4) described problematic use, involving patients with a history of incarceration or substance use disorder (SUD) who insufflated buspirone to achieve a sedative effect.
Conclusions: Findings highlight a discrepancy in the primary literature. Specifically, experimental studies conclude that so far, buspirone and tandospirone have a low potential for problematic use. However, more recent case reports document instances of nonprescribed buspirone misuse, particularly among individuals with a history of incarceration or SUD, possibly stemming from a complex interplay of biopsychosocial-behavioral rather than purely pharmacological factors. Further research is needed to guide strategies for preventing problematic azapirone use while ensuring effective anxiety treatment in high-risk populations.
期刊介绍:
The mission of Journal of Addiction Medicine, the official peer-reviewed journal of the American Society of Addiction Medicine, is to promote excellence in the practice of addiction medicine and in clinical research as well as to support Addiction Medicine as a mainstream medical sub-specialty.
Under the guidance of an esteemed Editorial Board, peer-reviewed articles published in the Journal focus on developments in addiction medicine as well as on treatment innovations and ethical, economic, forensic, and social topics including:
•addiction and substance use in pregnancy
•adolescent addiction and at-risk use
•the drug-exposed neonate
•pharmacology
•all psychoactive substances relevant to addiction, including alcohol, nicotine, caffeine, marijuana, opioids, stimulants and other prescription and illicit substances
•diagnosis
•neuroimaging techniques
•treatment of special populations
•treatment, early intervention and prevention of alcohol and drug use disorders
•methodological issues in addiction research
•pain and addiction, prescription drug use disorder
•co-occurring addiction, medical and psychiatric disorders
•pathological gambling disorder, sexual and other behavioral addictions
•pathophysiology of addiction
•behavioral and pharmacological treatments
•issues in graduate medical education
•recovery
•health services delivery
•ethical, legal and liability issues in addiction medicine practice
•drug testing
•self- and mutual-help.