阿片类药物使用障碍患者计算机行为治疗和康复指导相结合的综合干预的随机试点试验:克服研究。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Irene Pericot-Valverde, Moonseong Heo, Erik G Ortiz, Ashley C King, Angelica Perez, Laksika B Sivaraj, Snehal S Lopes, Kaileigh A Byrne, Alain H Litwin
{"title":"阿片类药物使用障碍患者计算机行为治疗和康复指导相结合的综合干预的随机试点试验:克服研究。","authors":"Irene Pericot-Valverde, Moonseong Heo, Erik G Ortiz, Ashley C King, Angelica Perez, Laksika B Sivaraj, Snehal S Lopes, Kaileigh A Byrne, Alain H Litwin","doi":"10.1097/ADM.0000000000001578","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People with opioid use disorder (OUD) often exhibit high rates of nonprescribed drug use and low retention on buprenorphine. This study tested the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of an intervention combining peer recovery coaching and CBT4CBT-buprenorphine (CBT4CBT+RC) to reduce nonprescribed drug use and increase buprenorphine retention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized trial conducted from December 15, 2020, to November 24, 2021, compared an 8-week CBT4CBT+RC intervention to treatment as usual (TAU). Outcomes included feasibility (recruitment, treatment initiation, and completion), acceptability (of CBT4CBT, recovery coaching, and integrated intervention), and preliminary efficacy (saliva toxicology and buprenorphine retention during treatment and at 1- and 3-mo follow-ups). Participants (N=38) had been receiving buprenorphine for an average of 270.1 days (SD=444.0) and reported recent nonprescribed drug use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Recruitment feasibility was 33.7%. Of the 19 participants assigned to CBT4CBT+RC, 94.7% met with a coach, and 52.6% initiated CBT4CBT. The average number of modules completed was 6.0 (299.7 min). Satisfaction with the intervention, coach, and CBT4CBT-buprenorphine was high (M≥4.9). Drug use was significantly lower in the CBT4CBT+RC group compared with TAU during treatment (35% vs. 69%, P=0.03), at 1 month (34% vs. 69%, P=0.009), and at 3 months (0% vs. 88%, P<0.001). Retention and opioid-positive tests did not differ between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The CBT4CBT+RC condition resulted in lower rates of saliva toxicology positive for drug use during treatment and follow-ups, but showed comparable buprenorphine retention rates to TAU. These findings provide promising support for the potential of CBT4CBT+RC to reduce drug use among individuals with OUD.</p>","PeriodicalId":14744,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Addiction Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Randomized Pilot Trial of an Integrated Intervention Combining Computerized Behavioral Therapy and Recovery Coaching for People With Opioid Use Disorder: The OVERCOME Study.\",\"authors\":\"Irene Pericot-Valverde, Moonseong Heo, Erik G Ortiz, Ashley C King, Angelica Perez, Laksika B Sivaraj, Snehal S Lopes, Kaileigh A Byrne, Alain H Litwin\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ADM.0000000000001578\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People with opioid use disorder (OUD) often exhibit high rates of nonprescribed drug use and low retention on buprenorphine. This study tested the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of an intervention combining peer recovery coaching and CBT4CBT-buprenorphine (CBT4CBT+RC) to reduce nonprescribed drug use and increase buprenorphine retention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized trial conducted from December 15, 2020, to November 24, 2021, compared an 8-week CBT4CBT+RC intervention to treatment as usual (TAU). Outcomes included feasibility (recruitment, treatment initiation, and completion), acceptability (of CBT4CBT, recovery coaching, and integrated intervention), and preliminary efficacy (saliva toxicology and buprenorphine retention during treatment and at 1- and 3-mo follow-ups). Participants (N=38) had been receiving buprenorphine for an average of 270.1 days (SD=444.0) and reported recent nonprescribed drug use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Recruitment feasibility was 33.7%. Of the 19 participants assigned to CBT4CBT+RC, 94.7% met with a coach, and 52.6% initiated CBT4CBT. The average number of modules completed was 6.0 (299.7 min). Satisfaction with the intervention, coach, and CBT4CBT-buprenorphine was high (M≥4.9). Drug use was significantly lower in the CBT4CBT+RC group compared with TAU during treatment (35% vs. 69%, P=0.03), at 1 month (34% vs. 69%, P=0.009), and at 3 months (0% vs. 88%, P<0.001). Retention and opioid-positive tests did not differ between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The CBT4CBT+RC condition resulted in lower rates of saliva toxicology positive for drug use during treatment and follow-ups, but showed comparable buprenorphine retention rates to TAU. These findings provide promising support for the potential of CBT4CBT+RC to reduce drug use among individuals with OUD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14744,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Addiction Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Addiction Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ADM.0000000000001578\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Addiction Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ADM.0000000000001578","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)患者经常表现出高非处方药使用率和低丁丙诺啡保留率。本研究测试了同伴康复指导与CBT4CBT-丁丙诺啡(CBT4CBT+RC)联合干预减少非处方药使用和增加丁丙诺啡保留率的可行性、可接受性和初步疗效。方法:一项随机试验于2020年12月15日至2021年11月24日进行,将为期8周的CBT4CBT+RC干预与常规治疗(TAU)进行比较。结果包括可行性(招募、治疗开始和完成)、可接受性(CBT4CBT、康复指导和综合干预)和初步疗效(治疗期间和1个月和3个月随访期间的唾液毒理学和丁丙诺啡保留)。参与者(N=38)平均服用丁丙诺啡270.1天(SD=444.0),并报告最近使用非处方药。结果:招募可行性为33.7%。在被分配到CBT4CBT+RC的19名参与者中,94.7%的人见过教练,52.6%的人开始了CBT4CBT。完成的平均模块数为6.0(299.7分钟)。对干预、教练和cbt4cbt -丁丙诺啡的满意度较高(M≥4.9)。与TAU相比,CBT4CBT+RC组在治疗期间(35%对69%,P=0.03)、1个月时(34%对69%,P=0.009)和3个月时(0%对88%)的药物使用均显著降低。结论:CBT4CBT+RC组在治疗和随访期间的唾液毒理学阳性药物使用率较低,但丁丙诺啡保留率与TAU相当。这些发现为CBT4CBT+RC减少OUD患者药物使用的潜力提供了有希望的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Randomized Pilot Trial of an Integrated Intervention Combining Computerized Behavioral Therapy and Recovery Coaching for People With Opioid Use Disorder: The OVERCOME Study.

Background: People with opioid use disorder (OUD) often exhibit high rates of nonprescribed drug use and low retention on buprenorphine. This study tested the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of an intervention combining peer recovery coaching and CBT4CBT-buprenorphine (CBT4CBT+RC) to reduce nonprescribed drug use and increase buprenorphine retention.

Methods: A randomized trial conducted from December 15, 2020, to November 24, 2021, compared an 8-week CBT4CBT+RC intervention to treatment as usual (TAU). Outcomes included feasibility (recruitment, treatment initiation, and completion), acceptability (of CBT4CBT, recovery coaching, and integrated intervention), and preliminary efficacy (saliva toxicology and buprenorphine retention during treatment and at 1- and 3-mo follow-ups). Participants (N=38) had been receiving buprenorphine for an average of 270.1 days (SD=444.0) and reported recent nonprescribed drug use.

Results: Recruitment feasibility was 33.7%. Of the 19 participants assigned to CBT4CBT+RC, 94.7% met with a coach, and 52.6% initiated CBT4CBT. The average number of modules completed was 6.0 (299.7 min). Satisfaction with the intervention, coach, and CBT4CBT-buprenorphine was high (M≥4.9). Drug use was significantly lower in the CBT4CBT+RC group compared with TAU during treatment (35% vs. 69%, P=0.03), at 1 month (34% vs. 69%, P=0.009), and at 3 months (0% vs. 88%, P<0.001). Retention and opioid-positive tests did not differ between groups.

Conclusions: The CBT4CBT+RC condition resulted in lower rates of saliva toxicology positive for drug use during treatment and follow-ups, but showed comparable buprenorphine retention rates to TAU. These findings provide promising support for the potential of CBT4CBT+RC to reduce drug use among individuals with OUD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Addiction Medicine
Journal of Addiction Medicine 医学-药物滥用
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
260
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of Journal of Addiction Medicine, the official peer-reviewed journal of the American Society of Addiction Medicine, is to promote excellence in the practice of addiction medicine and in clinical research as well as to support Addiction Medicine as a mainstream medical sub-specialty. Under the guidance of an esteemed Editorial Board, peer-reviewed articles published in the Journal focus on developments in addiction medicine as well as on treatment innovations and ethical, economic, forensic, and social topics including: •addiction and substance use in pregnancy •adolescent addiction and at-risk use •the drug-exposed neonate •pharmacology •all psychoactive substances relevant to addiction, including alcohol, nicotine, caffeine, marijuana, opioids, stimulants and other prescription and illicit substances •diagnosis •neuroimaging techniques •treatment of special populations •treatment, early intervention and prevention of alcohol and drug use disorders •methodological issues in addiction research •pain and addiction, prescription drug use disorder •co-occurring addiction, medical and psychiatric disorders •pathological gambling disorder, sexual and other behavioral addictions •pathophysiology of addiction •behavioral and pharmacological treatments •issues in graduate medical education •recovery •health services delivery •ethical, legal and liability issues in addiction medicine practice •drug testing •self- and mutual-help.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信