日本全科医师推进实地研究的分类方法。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
International Journal of General Medicine Pub Date : 2025-09-01 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/IJGM.S540846
Masaki Tago, Risa Hirata, Kiyoshi Shikino, Takashi Watari, Hiromizu Takahashi, Tomoyo Nishi, Yosuke Sasaki, Taro Shimizu
{"title":"日本全科医师推进实地研究的分类方法。","authors":"Masaki Tago, Risa Hirata, Kiyoshi Shikino, Takashi Watari, Hiromizu Takahashi, Tomoyo Nishi, Yosuke Sasaki, Taro Shimizu","doi":"10.2147/IJGM.S540846","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>General medicine physicians in Japan play diverse roles depending on their work environments; however, there is no clear definition. In the United States, the establishment of a definition for \"hospitalists\" has contributed to the accumulation of evidence. To develop research in general medicine and build evidence in Japan, there is an urgent need to establish a systematic classification method for general medicine physicians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Based on discussions with six hospital-based general medicine physicians with over 10 years of experience at an academic conference in 2024 and a literature review, we proposed a classification method for general medicine physicians.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The proposed classification method was based on four indicators: physician maldistribution index, inpatient care contribution index (the contribution of one general medicine physician to inpatient care across all beds in the hospital), clinical content (home medical care, outpatient care, emergency response, inpatients management, and critical inpatients management), and education (medical students, clinical residents, and senior residents). These indicators were established by considering physician characteristics, target population, social environment, and hospital environment, enabling an objective evaluation of factors contributing to the practice of general medicine physicians.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This classification method may serve as a foundation for research that makes it easier to understand the characteristics of general medicine physicians under study and allows for the comparison of roles according to regional characteristics and hospital size. Future validation and continuous improvement of this classification method are expected to advance the accumulation of evidence related to general medicine physicians. In this paper, we present a proposal for a classification method; future validation of this classification is necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":14131,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of General Medicine","volume":"18 ","pages":"5033-5038"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12413545/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Classification Method for General Medicine Physicians to Advance Field Research in Japan.\",\"authors\":\"Masaki Tago, Risa Hirata, Kiyoshi Shikino, Takashi Watari, Hiromizu Takahashi, Tomoyo Nishi, Yosuke Sasaki, Taro Shimizu\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/IJGM.S540846\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>General medicine physicians in Japan play diverse roles depending on their work environments; however, there is no clear definition. In the United States, the establishment of a definition for \\\"hospitalists\\\" has contributed to the accumulation of evidence. To develop research in general medicine and build evidence in Japan, there is an urgent need to establish a systematic classification method for general medicine physicians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Based on discussions with six hospital-based general medicine physicians with over 10 years of experience at an academic conference in 2024 and a literature review, we proposed a classification method for general medicine physicians.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The proposed classification method was based on four indicators: physician maldistribution index, inpatient care contribution index (the contribution of one general medicine physician to inpatient care across all beds in the hospital), clinical content (home medical care, outpatient care, emergency response, inpatients management, and critical inpatients management), and education (medical students, clinical residents, and senior residents). These indicators were established by considering physician characteristics, target population, social environment, and hospital environment, enabling an objective evaluation of factors contributing to the practice of general medicine physicians.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This classification method may serve as a foundation for research that makes it easier to understand the characteristics of general medicine physicians under study and allows for the comparison of roles according to regional characteristics and hospital size. Future validation and continuous improvement of this classification method are expected to advance the accumulation of evidence related to general medicine physicians. In this paper, we present a proposal for a classification method; future validation of this classification is necessary.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of General Medicine\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"5033-5038\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12413545/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of General Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S540846\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of General Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S540846","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:日本的全科医生根据他们的工作环境扮演不同的角色;然而,并没有明确的定义。在美国,“住院医师”定义的确立有助于证据的积累。为了在日本开展全科医学研究和建立证据,迫切需要建立一个系统的全科医学医师分类方法。方法:通过在2024年一次学术会议上与6位具有10年以上工作经验的医院全科医师的讨论和文献综述,提出一种全科医师的分类方法。结果:提出的分类方法基于4个指标:医师分布不均匀指数、住院护理贡献指数(一名全科医师对医院所有床位住院护理的贡献)、临床内容(家庭医疗、门诊护理、急诊响应、住院管理和危重住院管理)和教育(医学生、临床住院医师和老年住院医师)。综合考虑医师特点、目标人群、社会环境、医院环境等因素,客观评价影响全科医师执业的因素。结论:该分类方法可作为研究的基础,便于了解所研究的全科医师的特点,并可根据地区特点和医院规模进行角色比较。该分类方法的未来验证和持续改进有望促进与全科医生相关的证据积累。在本文中,我们提出了一种分类方法;未来对这种分类的验证是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A Classification Method for General Medicine Physicians to Advance Field Research in Japan.

A Classification Method for General Medicine Physicians to Advance Field Research in Japan.

Purpose: General medicine physicians in Japan play diverse roles depending on their work environments; however, there is no clear definition. In the United States, the establishment of a definition for "hospitalists" has contributed to the accumulation of evidence. To develop research in general medicine and build evidence in Japan, there is an urgent need to establish a systematic classification method for general medicine physicians.

Methods: Based on discussions with six hospital-based general medicine physicians with over 10 years of experience at an academic conference in 2024 and a literature review, we proposed a classification method for general medicine physicians.

Results: The proposed classification method was based on four indicators: physician maldistribution index, inpatient care contribution index (the contribution of one general medicine physician to inpatient care across all beds in the hospital), clinical content (home medical care, outpatient care, emergency response, inpatients management, and critical inpatients management), and education (medical students, clinical residents, and senior residents). These indicators were established by considering physician characteristics, target population, social environment, and hospital environment, enabling an objective evaluation of factors contributing to the practice of general medicine physicians.

Conclusion: This classification method may serve as a foundation for research that makes it easier to understand the characteristics of general medicine physicians under study and allows for the comparison of roles according to regional characteristics and hospital size. Future validation and continuous improvement of this classification method are expected to advance the accumulation of evidence related to general medicine physicians. In this paper, we present a proposal for a classification method; future validation of this classification is necessary.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of General Medicine
International Journal of General Medicine Medicine-General Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1113
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of General Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that focuses on general and internal medicine, pathogenesis, epidemiology, diagnosis, monitoring and treatment protocols. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of reviews, original research and clinical studies across all disease areas. A key focus of the journal is the elucidation of disease processes and management protocols resulting in improved outcomes for the patient. Patient perspectives such as satisfaction, quality of life, health literacy and communication and their role in developing new healthcare programs and optimizing clinical outcomes are major areas of interest for the journal. As of 1st April 2019, the International Journal of General Medicine will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信