{"title":"日本全科医师推进实地研究的分类方法。","authors":"Masaki Tago, Risa Hirata, Kiyoshi Shikino, Takashi Watari, Hiromizu Takahashi, Tomoyo Nishi, Yosuke Sasaki, Taro Shimizu","doi":"10.2147/IJGM.S540846","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>General medicine physicians in Japan play diverse roles depending on their work environments; however, there is no clear definition. In the United States, the establishment of a definition for \"hospitalists\" has contributed to the accumulation of evidence. To develop research in general medicine and build evidence in Japan, there is an urgent need to establish a systematic classification method for general medicine physicians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Based on discussions with six hospital-based general medicine physicians with over 10 years of experience at an academic conference in 2024 and a literature review, we proposed a classification method for general medicine physicians.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The proposed classification method was based on four indicators: physician maldistribution index, inpatient care contribution index (the contribution of one general medicine physician to inpatient care across all beds in the hospital), clinical content (home medical care, outpatient care, emergency response, inpatients management, and critical inpatients management), and education (medical students, clinical residents, and senior residents). These indicators were established by considering physician characteristics, target population, social environment, and hospital environment, enabling an objective evaluation of factors contributing to the practice of general medicine physicians.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This classification method may serve as a foundation for research that makes it easier to understand the characteristics of general medicine physicians under study and allows for the comparison of roles according to regional characteristics and hospital size. Future validation and continuous improvement of this classification method are expected to advance the accumulation of evidence related to general medicine physicians. In this paper, we present a proposal for a classification method; future validation of this classification is necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":14131,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of General Medicine","volume":"18 ","pages":"5033-5038"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12413545/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Classification Method for General Medicine Physicians to Advance Field Research in Japan.\",\"authors\":\"Masaki Tago, Risa Hirata, Kiyoshi Shikino, Takashi Watari, Hiromizu Takahashi, Tomoyo Nishi, Yosuke Sasaki, Taro Shimizu\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/IJGM.S540846\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>General medicine physicians in Japan play diverse roles depending on their work environments; however, there is no clear definition. In the United States, the establishment of a definition for \\\"hospitalists\\\" has contributed to the accumulation of evidence. To develop research in general medicine and build evidence in Japan, there is an urgent need to establish a systematic classification method for general medicine physicians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Based on discussions with six hospital-based general medicine physicians with over 10 years of experience at an academic conference in 2024 and a literature review, we proposed a classification method for general medicine physicians.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The proposed classification method was based on four indicators: physician maldistribution index, inpatient care contribution index (the contribution of one general medicine physician to inpatient care across all beds in the hospital), clinical content (home medical care, outpatient care, emergency response, inpatients management, and critical inpatients management), and education (medical students, clinical residents, and senior residents). These indicators were established by considering physician characteristics, target population, social environment, and hospital environment, enabling an objective evaluation of factors contributing to the practice of general medicine physicians.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This classification method may serve as a foundation for research that makes it easier to understand the characteristics of general medicine physicians under study and allows for the comparison of roles according to regional characteristics and hospital size. Future validation and continuous improvement of this classification method are expected to advance the accumulation of evidence related to general medicine physicians. In this paper, we present a proposal for a classification method; future validation of this classification is necessary.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of General Medicine\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"5033-5038\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12413545/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of General Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S540846\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of General Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S540846","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Classification Method for General Medicine Physicians to Advance Field Research in Japan.
Purpose: General medicine physicians in Japan play diverse roles depending on their work environments; however, there is no clear definition. In the United States, the establishment of a definition for "hospitalists" has contributed to the accumulation of evidence. To develop research in general medicine and build evidence in Japan, there is an urgent need to establish a systematic classification method for general medicine physicians.
Methods: Based on discussions with six hospital-based general medicine physicians with over 10 years of experience at an academic conference in 2024 and a literature review, we proposed a classification method for general medicine physicians.
Results: The proposed classification method was based on four indicators: physician maldistribution index, inpatient care contribution index (the contribution of one general medicine physician to inpatient care across all beds in the hospital), clinical content (home medical care, outpatient care, emergency response, inpatients management, and critical inpatients management), and education (medical students, clinical residents, and senior residents). These indicators were established by considering physician characteristics, target population, social environment, and hospital environment, enabling an objective evaluation of factors contributing to the practice of general medicine physicians.
Conclusion: This classification method may serve as a foundation for research that makes it easier to understand the characteristics of general medicine physicians under study and allows for the comparison of roles according to regional characteristics and hospital size. Future validation and continuous improvement of this classification method are expected to advance the accumulation of evidence related to general medicine physicians. In this paper, we present a proposal for a classification method; future validation of this classification is necessary.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of General Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that focuses on general and internal medicine, pathogenesis, epidemiology, diagnosis, monitoring and treatment protocols. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of reviews, original research and clinical studies across all disease areas.
A key focus of the journal is the elucidation of disease processes and management protocols resulting in improved outcomes for the patient. Patient perspectives such as satisfaction, quality of life, health literacy and communication and their role in developing new healthcare programs and optimizing clinical outcomes are major areas of interest for the journal.
As of 1st April 2019, the International Journal of General Medicine will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.