Hyung Ku Chon, Ik Hyun Jo, Sungjo Bang, Kihyun Ryu, Dong Wook Lee, Eaum Seok Lee, Yoon Suk Lee, Jonghyun Lee, Huapyong Kang, Tae Joo Jeon, Chang Hwan Park
{"title":"腔镜乳头切除术治疗壶腹腺瘤的全国调查:目前的做法和变异性。","authors":"Hyung Ku Chon, Ik Hyun Jo, Sungjo Bang, Kihyun Ryu, Dong Wook Lee, Eaum Seok Lee, Yoon Suk Lee, Jonghyun Lee, Huapyong Kang, Tae Joo Jeon, Chang Hwan Park","doi":"10.5009/gnl250252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>Ampullary adenomas are precancerous lesions requiring accurate diagnosis and timely intervention to prevent malignant transformation. Endoscopic papillectomy (EP) has emerged as a less invasive alternative to surgery; however, technical variations in practice remain. This study evaluated contemporary real-world approaches to the diagnosis, treatment, and surveillance of ampullary adenomas among pancreatobiliary endoscopists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A nationwide cross-sectional survey was conducted among pancreatobiliary endoscopists certified by the Korean Pancreatobiliary Association between January 19 and March 2, 2025. A 29-item questionnaire assessed diagnostic methods, procedural techniques, and follow-up strategies. Of 231 invitations sent, 85 responses (36.8%) were analyzed. Respondents were stratified by EP experience: ≤10 years (n=40) and >10 years (n=45).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Diagnostic and procedural strategies were largely comparable across the two experience groups. No significant differences were observed in the histologic reassessment, endoscopic ultrasound test, or cross-sectional images. Single pigtail plastic stents were the most preferred type for prophylactic pancreatic stenting, with a significantly higher preference among endoscopists with ≤10 years of experience compared to those with >10 years (92.5% vs 66.7%, p=0.008). For post-procedural bleeding management, fully covered self-expandable metal stents were more frequently used by endoscopists with ≤10 years of experience (47.5% vs 11.1%, p=0.001). Surveillance intervals, follow-up modalities, and timing of stent removal showed substantial heterogeneity, with no standardized patterns.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although general clinical practices appear standardized, significant variability remains in specific procedural and post-procedural approaches. These findings highlight the need for refined guidelines to support a more consistent and comprehensive approach to EP.</p>","PeriodicalId":12885,"journal":{"name":"Gut and Liver","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nationwide Survey on Endoscopic Papillectomy for Ampullary Adenoma: Current Practices and Variability.\",\"authors\":\"Hyung Ku Chon, Ik Hyun Jo, Sungjo Bang, Kihyun Ryu, Dong Wook Lee, Eaum Seok Lee, Yoon Suk Lee, Jonghyun Lee, Huapyong Kang, Tae Joo Jeon, Chang Hwan Park\",\"doi\":\"10.5009/gnl250252\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>Ampullary adenomas are precancerous lesions requiring accurate diagnosis and timely intervention to prevent malignant transformation. Endoscopic papillectomy (EP) has emerged as a less invasive alternative to surgery; however, technical variations in practice remain. This study evaluated contemporary real-world approaches to the diagnosis, treatment, and surveillance of ampullary adenomas among pancreatobiliary endoscopists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A nationwide cross-sectional survey was conducted among pancreatobiliary endoscopists certified by the Korean Pancreatobiliary Association between January 19 and March 2, 2025. A 29-item questionnaire assessed diagnostic methods, procedural techniques, and follow-up strategies. Of 231 invitations sent, 85 responses (36.8%) were analyzed. Respondents were stratified by EP experience: ≤10 years (n=40) and >10 years (n=45).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Diagnostic and procedural strategies were largely comparable across the two experience groups. No significant differences were observed in the histologic reassessment, endoscopic ultrasound test, or cross-sectional images. Single pigtail plastic stents were the most preferred type for prophylactic pancreatic stenting, with a significantly higher preference among endoscopists with ≤10 years of experience compared to those with >10 years (92.5% vs 66.7%, p=0.008). For post-procedural bleeding management, fully covered self-expandable metal stents were more frequently used by endoscopists with ≤10 years of experience (47.5% vs 11.1%, p=0.001). Surveillance intervals, follow-up modalities, and timing of stent removal showed substantial heterogeneity, with no standardized patterns.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although general clinical practices appear standardized, significant variability remains in specific procedural and post-procedural approaches. These findings highlight the need for refined guidelines to support a more consistent and comprehensive approach to EP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12885,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gut and Liver\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gut and Liver\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5009/gnl250252\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gut and Liver","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5009/gnl250252","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景/目的:壶腹腺瘤是癌前病变,需要准确诊断和及时干预,防止恶性转化。内窥镜乳头切除术(EP)已成为一种侵入性较小的手术替代方案;然而,实践中的技术差异仍然存在。本研究评估了当代胰胆管内窥镜医师对壶腹腺瘤的诊断、治疗和监测方法。方法:在2025年1月19日至3月2日期间,对经韩国胰胆管协会认证的胰胆管内窥镜医师进行了全国性的横断面调查。一份29项问卷评估了诊断方法、程序技术和随访策略。在发送的231份邀请中,分析了85份回复(36.8%)。受访者按EP经验分层:≤10年(n=40)和bbb10年(n=45)。结果:诊断和程序策略在两个经验组之间具有很大的可比性。在组织学重新评估、内镜超声检查或横断面图像中没有观察到显著差异。单尾塑料支架是预防性胰腺支架置入中最受欢迎的类型,经验≤10年的内窥镜医师比经验≤10年的内窥镜医师更倾向于使用单尾塑料支架(92.5% vs 66.7%, p=0.008)。对于术后出血处理,经验≤10年的内窥镜医师更常使用全覆盖自膨胀金属支架(47.5% vs 11.1%, p=0.001)。监测间隔、随访方式和支架取出时间显示出很大的异质性,没有标准化的模式。结论:虽然一般的临床实践是标准化的,但在具体的手术和术后方法上仍然存在显著的差异。这些发现强调需要完善指导方针,以支持更一致和全面的EP方法。
Nationwide Survey on Endoscopic Papillectomy for Ampullary Adenoma: Current Practices and Variability.
Background/aims: Ampullary adenomas are precancerous lesions requiring accurate diagnosis and timely intervention to prevent malignant transformation. Endoscopic papillectomy (EP) has emerged as a less invasive alternative to surgery; however, technical variations in practice remain. This study evaluated contemporary real-world approaches to the diagnosis, treatment, and surveillance of ampullary adenomas among pancreatobiliary endoscopists.
Methods: A nationwide cross-sectional survey was conducted among pancreatobiliary endoscopists certified by the Korean Pancreatobiliary Association between January 19 and March 2, 2025. A 29-item questionnaire assessed diagnostic methods, procedural techniques, and follow-up strategies. Of 231 invitations sent, 85 responses (36.8%) were analyzed. Respondents were stratified by EP experience: ≤10 years (n=40) and >10 years (n=45).
Results: Diagnostic and procedural strategies were largely comparable across the two experience groups. No significant differences were observed in the histologic reassessment, endoscopic ultrasound test, or cross-sectional images. Single pigtail plastic stents were the most preferred type for prophylactic pancreatic stenting, with a significantly higher preference among endoscopists with ≤10 years of experience compared to those with >10 years (92.5% vs 66.7%, p=0.008). For post-procedural bleeding management, fully covered self-expandable metal stents were more frequently used by endoscopists with ≤10 years of experience (47.5% vs 11.1%, p=0.001). Surveillance intervals, follow-up modalities, and timing of stent removal showed substantial heterogeneity, with no standardized patterns.
Conclusions: Although general clinical practices appear standardized, significant variability remains in specific procedural and post-procedural approaches. These findings highlight the need for refined guidelines to support a more consistent and comprehensive approach to EP.
期刊介绍:
Gut and Liver is an international journal of gastroenterology, focusing on the gastrointestinal tract, liver, biliary tree, pancreas, motility, and neurogastroenterology. Gut and Liver delivers up-to-date, authoritative papers on both clinical and research-based topics in gastroenterology. The Journal publishes original articles, case reports, brief communications, letters to the editor and invited review articles in the field of gastroenterology. The Journal is operated by internationally renowned editorial boards and designed to provide a global opportunity to promote academic developments in the field of gastroenterology and hepatology.
Gut and Liver is jointly owned and operated by 8 affiliated societies in the field of gastroenterology, namely: the Korean Society of Gastroenterology, the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, the Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, the Korean College of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research, the Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases, the Korean Association for the Study of the Liver, the Korean Pancreatobiliary Association, and the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Cancer.