Gowri Sivaramakrishnan, Kannan Sridharan, Mohammed Abdulla AlMuharraqi
{"title":"富血小板纤维蛋白或富血小板血浆治疗下颌骨折的有效性:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Gowri Sivaramakrishnan, Kannan Sridharan, Mohammed Abdulla AlMuharraqi","doi":"10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to critically evaluate and synthesize the available evidence on the use of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) in the management of mandibular and non-mandibular maxillofacial fractures. A comprehensive search of electronic databases was conducted up to February 2025 based on predefined inclusion criteria. The risk of bias in randomized controlled trials was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias (ROB) tool, while the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was applied to observational studies. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to evaluate bone mineral density (BMD) at fracture sites, with mean differences and 95% confidence intervals (CI) as the effect estimate. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic, and the certainty of evidence was rated using the GRADE approach. For clinical outcomes not suitable for meta-analysis, a qualitative synthesis was conducted. Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria. The pooled analysis revealed significantly higher mean BMD values in mandibular fractures treated with PRP/PRF at 3 months (127.33 [95% CI: 49.40 to 205.26]) and 6 months (41.47 [95% CI: 17.79 to 65.15]) follow-up compared to controls. Additionally, improved clinical outcomes-such as reduced inflammation, faster soft tissue healing, greater pain relief, and enhanced jaw mobility-were consistently reported in mandibular fracture cases treated with PRP/PRF. These findings suggest that PRP and PRF may have a beneficial role in the healing of mandibular fractures. However, the overall evidence remains limited, and studies assessing their use in non-mandibular maxillofacial fractures are scarce. Further high-quality research is needed to confirm these findings and assess their broader applicability.</p>","PeriodicalId":56038,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"102544"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of Platelet-Rich Fibrin or Platelet-Rich Plasma in Mandibular Fracture Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Gowri Sivaramakrishnan, Kannan Sridharan, Mohammed Abdulla AlMuharraqi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102544\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to critically evaluate and synthesize the available evidence on the use of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) in the management of mandibular and non-mandibular maxillofacial fractures. A comprehensive search of electronic databases was conducted up to February 2025 based on predefined inclusion criteria. The risk of bias in randomized controlled trials was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias (ROB) tool, while the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was applied to observational studies. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to evaluate bone mineral density (BMD) at fracture sites, with mean differences and 95% confidence intervals (CI) as the effect estimate. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic, and the certainty of evidence was rated using the GRADE approach. For clinical outcomes not suitable for meta-analysis, a qualitative synthesis was conducted. Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria. The pooled analysis revealed significantly higher mean BMD values in mandibular fractures treated with PRP/PRF at 3 months (127.33 [95% CI: 49.40 to 205.26]) and 6 months (41.47 [95% CI: 17.79 to 65.15]) follow-up compared to controls. Additionally, improved clinical outcomes-such as reduced inflammation, faster soft tissue healing, greater pain relief, and enhanced jaw mobility-were consistently reported in mandibular fracture cases treated with PRP/PRF. These findings suggest that PRP and PRF may have a beneficial role in the healing of mandibular fractures. However, the overall evidence remains limited, and studies assessing their use in non-mandibular maxillofacial fractures are scarce. Further high-quality research is needed to confirm these findings and assess their broader applicability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56038,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"102544\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102544\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102544","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effectiveness of Platelet-Rich Fibrin or Platelet-Rich Plasma in Mandibular Fracture Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to critically evaluate and synthesize the available evidence on the use of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) in the management of mandibular and non-mandibular maxillofacial fractures. A comprehensive search of electronic databases was conducted up to February 2025 based on predefined inclusion criteria. The risk of bias in randomized controlled trials was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias (ROB) tool, while the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was applied to observational studies. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to evaluate bone mineral density (BMD) at fracture sites, with mean differences and 95% confidence intervals (CI) as the effect estimate. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic, and the certainty of evidence was rated using the GRADE approach. For clinical outcomes not suitable for meta-analysis, a qualitative synthesis was conducted. Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria. The pooled analysis revealed significantly higher mean BMD values in mandibular fractures treated with PRP/PRF at 3 months (127.33 [95% CI: 49.40 to 205.26]) and 6 months (41.47 [95% CI: 17.79 to 65.15]) follow-up compared to controls. Additionally, improved clinical outcomes-such as reduced inflammation, faster soft tissue healing, greater pain relief, and enhanced jaw mobility-were consistently reported in mandibular fracture cases treated with PRP/PRF. These findings suggest that PRP and PRF may have a beneficial role in the healing of mandibular fractures. However, the overall evidence remains limited, and studies assessing their use in non-mandibular maxillofacial fractures are scarce. Further high-quality research is needed to confirm these findings and assess their broader applicability.
期刊介绍:
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg publishes research papers and techniques - (guest) editorials, original articles, reviews, technical notes, case reports, images, letters to the editor, guidelines - dedicated to enhancing surgical expertise in all fields relevant to oral and maxillofacial surgery: from plastic and reconstructive surgery of the face, oral surgery and medicine, … to dentofacial and maxillofacial orthopedics.
Original articles include clinical or laboratory investigations and clinical or equipment reports. Reviews include narrative reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
All manuscripts submitted to the journal are subjected to peer review by international experts, and must:
Be written in excellent English, clear and easy to understand, precise and concise;
Bring new, interesting, valid information - and improve clinical care or guide future research;
Be solely the work of the author(s) stated;
Not have been previously published elsewhere and not be under consideration by another journal;
Be in accordance with the journal''s Guide for Authors'' instructions: manuscripts that fail to comply with these rules may be returned to the authors without being reviewed.
Under no circumstances does the journal guarantee publication before the editorial board makes its final decision.
The journal is indexed in the main international databases and is accessible worldwide through the ScienceDirect and ClinicalKey Platforms.