中国围手术期胃反流和肺误吸管理的现状:一项横断面调查。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Pub Date : 2025-08-31 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/RMHP.S522663
Xiangyong Zhou, Jiachun Tao, Yuanyuan Yao, Ge Luo, Min Rui, Min Yan
{"title":"中国围手术期胃反流和肺误吸管理的现状:一项横断面调查。","authors":"Xiangyong Zhou, Jiachun Tao, Yuanyuan Yao, Ge Luo, Min Rui, Min Yan","doi":"10.2147/RMHP.S522663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Aspiration of gastric contents is the major cause of respiratory tract-related complications, which can lead to death. Despite its significance, nationwide research on the practice of managing gastric regurgitation and pulmonary aspiration remains inadequate. We aimed to conduct a national survey to gain an in-depth understanding of the management and clinical practices surrounding perioperative gastric regurgitation and pulmonary aspiration among anesthesiologists in China.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 26-item questionnaire was sent to all registered anesthesiologist members via WeChat and the New Youth Anesthesia Forum website.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significant portion (70.77%) of respondents reported having encountered gastric regurgitation or pulmonary aspiration, with 50.15% experiencing cases where both regurgitation and aspiration occurred. While most patients had a favorable prognosis following aspiration, 20.63% and 20.72% of respondents indicated that their patients developed severe pneumonia or died as a result. Regurgitation and aspiration events mainly occurred during emergency surgery (86.39%), with abdominal operation (78.86%) being the most common. The induction of general anesthesia was identified as the most common phase for these events (75.33%). Rapid sequence induction (RSI) was employed by 61.98% of respondents. While 59.97% of respondents reported that their departments provided training on regurgitation and aspiration, only 20.34% had training specifically in gastric ultrasound technology. Additionally, 41.63% of the respondents' institutions were equipped with gastric ultrasound devices. A small fraction (14.93%) of respondents were proficient in gastric ultrasound examination techniques, while 20.99% were completely unfamiliar with the technology.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our survey revealed that gastric regurgitation and pulmonary aspiration, as major threats to the safety of perioperative patients, still pose significant challenges in the practice of anesthesia in China. There are still many deficiencies in management. Strengthening training and improving resource allocation, especially in the adoption and widespread use of gastric ultrasound technology, are the directions that need to be improved in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":56009,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","volume":"18 ","pages":"2851-2863"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12410378/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Current Practice of Perioperative Gastric Regurgitation and Pulmonary Aspiration Management in China: A Cross-Sectional Survey.\",\"authors\":\"Xiangyong Zhou, Jiachun Tao, Yuanyuan Yao, Ge Luo, Min Rui, Min Yan\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/RMHP.S522663\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Aspiration of gastric contents is the major cause of respiratory tract-related complications, which can lead to death. Despite its significance, nationwide research on the practice of managing gastric regurgitation and pulmonary aspiration remains inadequate. We aimed to conduct a national survey to gain an in-depth understanding of the management and clinical practices surrounding perioperative gastric regurgitation and pulmonary aspiration among anesthesiologists in China.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 26-item questionnaire was sent to all registered anesthesiologist members via WeChat and the New Youth Anesthesia Forum website.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significant portion (70.77%) of respondents reported having encountered gastric regurgitation or pulmonary aspiration, with 50.15% experiencing cases where both regurgitation and aspiration occurred. While most patients had a favorable prognosis following aspiration, 20.63% and 20.72% of respondents indicated that their patients developed severe pneumonia or died as a result. Regurgitation and aspiration events mainly occurred during emergency surgery (86.39%), with abdominal operation (78.86%) being the most common. The induction of general anesthesia was identified as the most common phase for these events (75.33%). Rapid sequence induction (RSI) was employed by 61.98% of respondents. While 59.97% of respondents reported that their departments provided training on regurgitation and aspiration, only 20.34% had training specifically in gastric ultrasound technology. Additionally, 41.63% of the respondents' institutions were equipped with gastric ultrasound devices. A small fraction (14.93%) of respondents were proficient in gastric ultrasound examination techniques, while 20.99% were completely unfamiliar with the technology.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our survey revealed that gastric regurgitation and pulmonary aspiration, as major threats to the safety of perioperative patients, still pose significant challenges in the practice of anesthesia in China. There are still many deficiencies in management. Strengthening training and improving resource allocation, especially in the adoption and widespread use of gastric ultrasound technology, are the directions that need to be improved in the future.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56009,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"2851-2863\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12410378/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S522663\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S522663","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:胃内容物误吸是呼吸道相关并发症的主要原因,可导致死亡。尽管具有重要意义,但全国范围内对胃反流和肺误吸治疗实践的研究仍然不足。我们旨在开展一项全国性的调查,以深入了解中国麻醉医师围手术期胃反流和肺误吸的管理和临床实践。方法:通过微信和新青年麻醉论坛网站向所有注册麻醉师会员发放一份26项问卷。结果:有显著比例(70.77%)的调查对象报告发生过胃反流或肺误吸,其中50.15%的调查对象同时发生过胃反流和肺误吸。虽然大多数患者在误吸后预后良好,但20.63%和20.72%的受访者表示他们的患者发展为严重肺炎或因此死亡。反吸事件主要发生在急诊手术(86.39%),以腹部手术(78.86%)最为常见。全麻诱导是这些事件最常见的阶段(75.33%)。61.98%的被调查者采用快速序列诱导(RSI)。59.97%的受访者表示其科室有反流和误吸方面的培训,而仅有20.34%的受访者有胃超声技术方面的专门培训。41.63%的受访机构配备了胃超声设备。小部分受访者(14.93%)对胃超声检查技术熟练,20.99%完全不熟悉。结论:我们的调查显示,胃反流和肺误吸作为围手术期患者安全的主要威胁,仍然是中国麻醉实践中的重大挑战。在管理上还有很多不足。加强培训,改善资源配置,特别是在胃超声技术的采用和推广应用方面,是今后需要改进的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Current Practice of Perioperative Gastric Regurgitation and Pulmonary Aspiration Management in China: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

Current Practice of Perioperative Gastric Regurgitation and Pulmonary Aspiration Management in China: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

Current Practice of Perioperative Gastric Regurgitation and Pulmonary Aspiration Management in China: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

Current Practice of Perioperative Gastric Regurgitation and Pulmonary Aspiration Management in China: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

Background and objective: Aspiration of gastric contents is the major cause of respiratory tract-related complications, which can lead to death. Despite its significance, nationwide research on the practice of managing gastric regurgitation and pulmonary aspiration remains inadequate. We aimed to conduct a national survey to gain an in-depth understanding of the management and clinical practices surrounding perioperative gastric regurgitation and pulmonary aspiration among anesthesiologists in China.

Methods: A 26-item questionnaire was sent to all registered anesthesiologist members via WeChat and the New Youth Anesthesia Forum website.

Results: A significant portion (70.77%) of respondents reported having encountered gastric regurgitation or pulmonary aspiration, with 50.15% experiencing cases where both regurgitation and aspiration occurred. While most patients had a favorable prognosis following aspiration, 20.63% and 20.72% of respondents indicated that their patients developed severe pneumonia or died as a result. Regurgitation and aspiration events mainly occurred during emergency surgery (86.39%), with abdominal operation (78.86%) being the most common. The induction of general anesthesia was identified as the most common phase for these events (75.33%). Rapid sequence induction (RSI) was employed by 61.98% of respondents. While 59.97% of respondents reported that their departments provided training on regurgitation and aspiration, only 20.34% had training specifically in gastric ultrasound technology. Additionally, 41.63% of the respondents' institutions were equipped with gastric ultrasound devices. A small fraction (14.93%) of respondents were proficient in gastric ultrasound examination techniques, while 20.99% were completely unfamiliar with the technology.

Conclusion: Our survey revealed that gastric regurgitation and pulmonary aspiration, as major threats to the safety of perioperative patients, still pose significant challenges in the practice of anesthesia in China. There are still many deficiencies in management. Strengthening training and improving resource allocation, especially in the adoption and widespread use of gastric ultrasound technology, are the directions that need to be improved in the future.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
242
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Risk Management and Healthcare Policy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on all aspects of public health, policy and preventative measures to promote good health and improve morbidity and mortality in the population. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Public and community health Policy and law Preventative and predictive healthcare Risk and hazard management Epidemiology, detection and screening Lifestyle and diet modification Vaccination and disease transmission/modification programs Health and safety and occupational health Healthcare services provision Health literacy and education Advertising and promotion of health issues Health economic evaluations and resource management Risk Management and Healthcare Policy focuses on human interventional and observational research. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and extended reports. Case reports will only be considered if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信