抗淀粉样蛋白单克隆抗体中ARIA-H风险的结构和功能决定因素:阿尔茨海默病免疫治疗发展的比较机制框架。

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES
Dinghao An, Xinxin Zou, Yun Xu
{"title":"抗淀粉样蛋白单克隆抗体中ARIA-H风险的结构和功能决定因素:阿尔茨海默病免疫治疗发展的比较机制框架。","authors":"Dinghao An, Xinxin Zou, Yun Xu","doi":"10.2174/011570159X391766250806091602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Amyloid-beta-targeting monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) for Alzheimer's disease frequently induce amyloid-related imaging abnormalities with hemorrhage (ARIA-H), yet systematic comparisons of ARIA-H incidence across therapeutic agents remain limited. Post-approval research prioritizes dosing over mechanism, leaving unresolved whether ARIA-H variations originate from intrinsic mAb properties. We address two gaps: comparative ARIA-H risk stratification among clinically available/investigational mAbs, and elucidation of structural/functional features influencing ARIA-H susceptibility.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic comparison of seven mAbs (donanemab, aducanumab, bapineuzumab, lecanemab, gantenerumab, crenezumab, solanezumab) was conducted, analyzing clinical trial data and molecular characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ARIA-H incidence ranked as follows (highest to lowest): donanemab > aducanumab > bapineuzumab > lecanemab > gantenerumab > crenezumab > solanezumab. Five mAb-specific determinants emerged: (1) Types of Aβ Binding: Enhanced clearance of mature amyloid plaques correlated with elevated ARIA-H risk. (2) Polymer binding Affinity: Reduced small oligomer-binding capacity predicted higher ARIA-H incidence. (3) Epitope location: N-terminal-targeting mAbs showed greater ARIA-H incidence vs. mid/C-terminal binders. (4) Fc region structure: IgG4-based constructs showed higher ARIA-H incidence than IgG1 analogs. (5) Clearance kinetics: Rapid attainment of amyloid reduction thresholds amplified ARIA-H incidence.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>We identify a risk hierarchy for ARIA-H among anti-Aβ mAbs and link specific mAb biophysical properties-Aβ binding type, affinity for soluble oligomers, epitope specificity, Fc structure, and plaque clearance dynamics-directly to ARIA-H pathogenesis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings establish a mechanistic framework for ARIA-H risk and provide concrete molecular predictors to guide antibody engineering strategies. Prioritizing mAbs with controlled amyloid clearance, C-terminal binding domains, and IgG1 frameworks may enhance therapeutic safety, advancing precision immunotherapy for Alzheimer's disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":10905,"journal":{"name":"Current Neuropharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Structural and Functional Determinants of ARIA-H Risk in Anti-Amyloid Monoclonal Antibodies: A Comparative Mechanistic Framework for Alzheimer's Immunotherapy Development.\",\"authors\":\"Dinghao An, Xinxin Zou, Yun Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/011570159X391766250806091602\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Amyloid-beta-targeting monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) for Alzheimer's disease frequently induce amyloid-related imaging abnormalities with hemorrhage (ARIA-H), yet systematic comparisons of ARIA-H incidence across therapeutic agents remain limited. Post-approval research prioritizes dosing over mechanism, leaving unresolved whether ARIA-H variations originate from intrinsic mAb properties. We address two gaps: comparative ARIA-H risk stratification among clinically available/investigational mAbs, and elucidation of structural/functional features influencing ARIA-H susceptibility.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic comparison of seven mAbs (donanemab, aducanumab, bapineuzumab, lecanemab, gantenerumab, crenezumab, solanezumab) was conducted, analyzing clinical trial data and molecular characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ARIA-H incidence ranked as follows (highest to lowest): donanemab > aducanumab > bapineuzumab > lecanemab > gantenerumab > crenezumab > solanezumab. Five mAb-specific determinants emerged: (1) Types of Aβ Binding: Enhanced clearance of mature amyloid plaques correlated with elevated ARIA-H risk. (2) Polymer binding Affinity: Reduced small oligomer-binding capacity predicted higher ARIA-H incidence. (3) Epitope location: N-terminal-targeting mAbs showed greater ARIA-H incidence vs. mid/C-terminal binders. (4) Fc region structure: IgG4-based constructs showed higher ARIA-H incidence than IgG1 analogs. (5) Clearance kinetics: Rapid attainment of amyloid reduction thresholds amplified ARIA-H incidence.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>We identify a risk hierarchy for ARIA-H among anti-Aβ mAbs and link specific mAb biophysical properties-Aβ binding type, affinity for soluble oligomers, epitope specificity, Fc structure, and plaque clearance dynamics-directly to ARIA-H pathogenesis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings establish a mechanistic framework for ARIA-H risk and provide concrete molecular predictors to guide antibody engineering strategies. Prioritizing mAbs with controlled amyloid clearance, C-terminal binding domains, and IgG1 frameworks may enhance therapeutic safety, advancing precision immunotherapy for Alzheimer's disease.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10905,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Neuropharmacology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Neuropharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/011570159X391766250806091602\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Neuropharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/011570159X391766250806091602","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

针对阿尔茨海默病的淀粉样蛋白靶向单克隆抗体(mab)经常引起淀粉样蛋白相关的影像学异常,并伴有出血(ARIA-H),但不同治疗药物间ARIA-H发生率的系统比较仍然有限。批准后的研究优先考虑剂量而不是机制,但仍未解决ARIA-H的变化是否源于固有的mAb特性。我们解决了两个空白:在临床可用/研究性单克隆抗体中比较ARIA-H风险分层,以及阐明影响ARIA-H易感性的结构/功能特征。方法:对7种单抗(donanemab、aducanumab、bapineuzumab、lecanemab、gantenerumab、crenezumab、solanezumab)进行系统比较,分析临床试验数据和分子特征。结果:ARIA-H发病率排序如下(从高到低):donanemab > aducanumab > bapineuzumab > lecanemab > gentenerumab > crenezumab > solanezumab。出现了五个单克隆抗体特异性决定因素:(1)Aβ结合类型:成熟淀粉样斑块的清除增强与ARIA-H风险升高相关。(2)聚合物结合亲和力:低聚物结合能力的降低预示着更高的ARIA-H发病率。(3)表位定位:n端靶向单抗与中/ c端结合物相比,ARIA-H发生率更高。(4) Fc区结构:基于igg4的构建物的ARIA-H发生率高于IgG1类似物。(5)清除动力学:快速达到淀粉样蛋白减少阈值会增加ARIA-H的发病率。讨论:我们确定了抗a β单抗中ARIA-H的风险等级,并将特异性单抗的生物物理性质——a β结合类型、对可溶性低聚物的亲和力、表位特异性、Fc结构和斑块清除动力学——与ARIA-H的发病机制直接联系起来。结论:这些发现建立了ARIA-H风险的机制框架,并为指导抗体工程策略提供了具体的分子预测指标。优先考虑具有控制淀粉样蛋白清除、c端结合域和IgG1框架的单克隆抗体可能提高治疗安全性,推进阿尔茨海默病的精确免疫治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Structural and Functional Determinants of ARIA-H Risk in Anti-Amyloid Monoclonal Antibodies: A Comparative Mechanistic Framework for Alzheimer's Immunotherapy Development.

Introduction: Amyloid-beta-targeting monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) for Alzheimer's disease frequently induce amyloid-related imaging abnormalities with hemorrhage (ARIA-H), yet systematic comparisons of ARIA-H incidence across therapeutic agents remain limited. Post-approval research prioritizes dosing over mechanism, leaving unresolved whether ARIA-H variations originate from intrinsic mAb properties. We address two gaps: comparative ARIA-H risk stratification among clinically available/investigational mAbs, and elucidation of structural/functional features influencing ARIA-H susceptibility.

Methods: A systematic comparison of seven mAbs (donanemab, aducanumab, bapineuzumab, lecanemab, gantenerumab, crenezumab, solanezumab) was conducted, analyzing clinical trial data and molecular characteristics.

Results: ARIA-H incidence ranked as follows (highest to lowest): donanemab > aducanumab > bapineuzumab > lecanemab > gantenerumab > crenezumab > solanezumab. Five mAb-specific determinants emerged: (1) Types of Aβ Binding: Enhanced clearance of mature amyloid plaques correlated with elevated ARIA-H risk. (2) Polymer binding Affinity: Reduced small oligomer-binding capacity predicted higher ARIA-H incidence. (3) Epitope location: N-terminal-targeting mAbs showed greater ARIA-H incidence vs. mid/C-terminal binders. (4) Fc region structure: IgG4-based constructs showed higher ARIA-H incidence than IgG1 analogs. (5) Clearance kinetics: Rapid attainment of amyloid reduction thresholds amplified ARIA-H incidence.

Discussion: We identify a risk hierarchy for ARIA-H among anti-Aβ mAbs and link specific mAb biophysical properties-Aβ binding type, affinity for soluble oligomers, epitope specificity, Fc structure, and plaque clearance dynamics-directly to ARIA-H pathogenesis.

Conclusion: These findings establish a mechanistic framework for ARIA-H risk and provide concrete molecular predictors to guide antibody engineering strategies. Prioritizing mAbs with controlled amyloid clearance, C-terminal binding domains, and IgG1 frameworks may enhance therapeutic safety, advancing precision immunotherapy for Alzheimer's disease.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Neuropharmacology
Current Neuropharmacology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
1.90%
发文量
369
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Current Neuropharmacology aims to provide current, comprehensive/mini reviews and guest edited issues of all areas of neuropharmacology and related matters of neuroscience. The reviews cover the fields of molecular, cellular, and systems/behavioural aspects of neuropharmacology and neuroscience. The journal serves as a comprehensive, multidisciplinary expert forum for neuropharmacologists and neuroscientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信