泌尿外科荟萃分析和系统评价指南。

IF 4.4 2区医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY

BJU International Pub Date : 2025-09-08 DOI:10.1111/bju.16864

Andrew J Vickers, Melissa Assel, Rodney L Dunn, Graeme MacLennan, Betsy Jane Becker, Richard D Riley

{"title":"泌尿外科荟萃分析和系统评价指南。","authors":"Andrew J Vickers, Melissa Assel, Rodney L Dunn, Graeme MacLennan, Betsy Jane Becker, Richard D Riley","doi":"10.1111/bju.16864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In an effort to improve the quality of systematic reviews and meta-analysis in the clinical urology literature, a group of statisticians developed a set of guidelines to address common errors of analysis, reporting and interpretation. One key focus is the assessment and interpretation of between-studies heterogeneity. Application of the guidelines will help avoid 'cookie cutter science' and lead to more considered analysis and interpretation of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.","PeriodicalId":8985,"journal":{"name":"BJU International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Guidelines for meta-analyses and systematic reviews in urology.\",\"authors\":\"Andrew J Vickers, Melissa Assel, Rodney L Dunn, Graeme MacLennan, Betsy Jane Becker, Richard D Riley\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bju.16864\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In an effort to improve the quality of systematic reviews and meta-analysis in the clinical urology literature, a group of statisticians developed a set of guidelines to address common errors of analysis, reporting and interpretation. One key focus is the assessment and interpretation of between-studies heterogeneity. Application of the guidelines will help avoid 'cookie cutter science' and lead to more considered analysis and interpretation of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8985,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJU International\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJU International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.16864\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJU International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.16864","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

为了提高临床泌尿学文献系统评价和荟萃分析的质量，一组统计学家制定了一套指南来解决分析、报告和解释中的常见错误。一个关键的焦点是评估和解释研究之间的异质性。指南的应用将有助于避免“千篇一律的科学”，并导致对系统评价和元分析进行更深思熟虑的分析和解释。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Guidelines for meta-analyses and systematic reviews in urology.

In an effort to improve the quality of systematic reviews and meta-analysis in the clinical urology literature, a group of statisticians developed a set of guidelines to address common errors of analysis, reporting and interpretation. One key focus is the assessment and interpretation of between-studies heterogeneity. Application of the guidelines will help avoid 'cookie cutter science' and lead to more considered analysis and interpretation of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

BJU International 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学

CiteScore

9.10

自引率

4.40%

发文量

262

审稿时长

1 months

期刊介绍： BJUI is one of the most highly respected medical journals in the world, with a truly international range of published papers and appeal. Every issue gives invaluable practical information in the form of original articles, reviews, comments, surgical education articles, and translational science articles in the field of urology. BJUI employs topical sections, and is in full colour, making it easier to browse or search for something specific.