患者对青光眼治疗的偏好和理解:法国青光眼协会的一项全国性调查。

IF 4 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Paul Bastelica, Antoine Labbe, Marwan Sahyoun, Christophe Baudouin, Cédric Lamirel, Muriel Poli, Jean-Paul Renard, Antoine Rousseau, Cédric Schweitzer, Florent Aptel
{"title":"患者对青光眼治疗的偏好和理解:法国青光眼协会的一项全国性调查。","authors":"Paul Bastelica, Antoine Labbe, Marwan Sahyoun, Christophe Baudouin, Cédric Lamirel, Muriel Poli, Jean-Paul Renard, Antoine Rousseau, Cédric Schweitzer, Florent Aptel","doi":"10.1007/s12325-025-03353-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Glaucoma treatment predominantly involves the use of topical anti-glaucoma eye drops, with patient adherence influenced by individual preferences. This study aimed to assess these preferences and highlight the importance of personalized treatment approaches among ophthalmologists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This French multicenter, cross-sectional study involved 21 ophthalmologists-members of the Board of Directors of the French Society of Glaucoma-from both public and private practices, who distributed a standardized questionnaire to their patients with glaucoma. The questionnaire collected data on demographics, treatment-related experiences, patient preferences, and the prioritization of six treatment criteria: cost, efficacy, dosing frequency, side effects, environmental impact, and ease of use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 798 patients with glaucoma participated. There was no strong preference between multi-dose bottles and single-dose units (32.0% vs. 37.4%, respectively, with 29.2% of patients showing no preference). Side effects were reported by 31.8% of patients, and the use of artificial tears was significantly higher among those with longer treatment durations (31.3% for ≤ 2 years vs. 65.6% for > 20 years, p = 0.001). Notably, 63% of patients were unaware that their eye drops could contain preservatives. Regarding generics, 29.9% of patients had previously used one, while only 25.6% were willing to switch from their prescribed brand to a generic equivalent. Adherence was suboptimal, with only 66.2% of patients reporting being compliant. Younger age (p < 0.001) and lack of awareness about preservatives (p < 0.001) were significantly associated with non-adherence. When ranking treatment criteria, patients prioritized efficacy, followed by side effects, ease of use, cost, and environmental impact.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This nationwide survey conducted by the French Glaucoma Society underscores the diversity of patient preferences and the critical need for personalized glaucoma care. A substantial proportion of patients feels insufficiently informed about preservatives and generics, which may negatively impact adherence. Enhanced patient education and individualized treatment strategies are essential for improving outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":7482,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient Preferences and Understanding of Glaucoma Treatment: A Nationwide Survey by the French Glaucoma Society.\",\"authors\":\"Paul Bastelica, Antoine Labbe, Marwan Sahyoun, Christophe Baudouin, Cédric Lamirel, Muriel Poli, Jean-Paul Renard, Antoine Rousseau, Cédric Schweitzer, Florent Aptel\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12325-025-03353-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Glaucoma treatment predominantly involves the use of topical anti-glaucoma eye drops, with patient adherence influenced by individual preferences. This study aimed to assess these preferences and highlight the importance of personalized treatment approaches among ophthalmologists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This French multicenter, cross-sectional study involved 21 ophthalmologists-members of the Board of Directors of the French Society of Glaucoma-from both public and private practices, who distributed a standardized questionnaire to their patients with glaucoma. The questionnaire collected data on demographics, treatment-related experiences, patient preferences, and the prioritization of six treatment criteria: cost, efficacy, dosing frequency, side effects, environmental impact, and ease of use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 798 patients with glaucoma participated. There was no strong preference between multi-dose bottles and single-dose units (32.0% vs. 37.4%, respectively, with 29.2% of patients showing no preference). Side effects were reported by 31.8% of patients, and the use of artificial tears was significantly higher among those with longer treatment durations (31.3% for ≤ 2 years vs. 65.6% for > 20 years, p = 0.001). Notably, 63% of patients were unaware that their eye drops could contain preservatives. Regarding generics, 29.9% of patients had previously used one, while only 25.6% were willing to switch from their prescribed brand to a generic equivalent. Adherence was suboptimal, with only 66.2% of patients reporting being compliant. Younger age (p < 0.001) and lack of awareness about preservatives (p < 0.001) were significantly associated with non-adherence. When ranking treatment criteria, patients prioritized efficacy, followed by side effects, ease of use, cost, and environmental impact.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This nationwide survey conducted by the French Glaucoma Society underscores the diversity of patient preferences and the critical need for personalized glaucoma care. A substantial proportion of patients feels insufficiently informed about preservatives and generics, which may negatively impact adherence. Enhanced patient education and individualized treatment strategies are essential for improving outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-025-03353-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-025-03353-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

青光眼的治疗主要包括使用局部抗青光眼滴眼液,患者的依从性受个人偏好的影响。本研究旨在评估这些偏好,并强调眼科医生个性化治疗方法的重要性。方法:这项法国多中心横断面研究涉及21名眼科医生(法国青光眼协会董事会成员),他们来自公立和私立诊所,向他们的青光眼患者分发标准化问卷。调查问卷收集了人口统计数据、治疗相关经验、患者偏好以及六项治疗标准的优先顺序:成本、疗效、给药频率、副作用、环境影响和易用性。结果:共有798例青光眼患者参与。多剂量瓶和单剂量单位之间没有强烈的偏好(分别为32.0%和37.4%,29.2%的患者没有偏好)。31.8%的患者报告了副作用,而在治疗时间较长的患者中,人工泪液的使用率明显较高(≤2年的31.3% vs. 100 ~ 20年的65.6%,p = 0.001)。值得注意的是,63%的患者不知道他们的眼药水可能含有防腐剂。关于仿制药,29.9%的患者以前使用过一种,而只有25.6%的患者愿意从处方品牌切换到仿制药。依从性是次优的,只有66.2%的患者报告依从。结论:这项由法国青光眼协会开展的全国性调查强调了患者偏好的多样性和个性化青光眼护理的迫切需要。相当大比例的患者感觉对防腐剂和仿制药的了解不足,这可能会对依从性产生负面影响。加强患者教育和个性化治疗策略对改善结果至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patient Preferences and Understanding of Glaucoma Treatment: A Nationwide Survey by the French Glaucoma Society.

Introduction: Glaucoma treatment predominantly involves the use of topical anti-glaucoma eye drops, with patient adherence influenced by individual preferences. This study aimed to assess these preferences and highlight the importance of personalized treatment approaches among ophthalmologists.

Methods: This French multicenter, cross-sectional study involved 21 ophthalmologists-members of the Board of Directors of the French Society of Glaucoma-from both public and private practices, who distributed a standardized questionnaire to their patients with glaucoma. The questionnaire collected data on demographics, treatment-related experiences, patient preferences, and the prioritization of six treatment criteria: cost, efficacy, dosing frequency, side effects, environmental impact, and ease of use.

Results: A total of 798 patients with glaucoma participated. There was no strong preference between multi-dose bottles and single-dose units (32.0% vs. 37.4%, respectively, with 29.2% of patients showing no preference). Side effects were reported by 31.8% of patients, and the use of artificial tears was significantly higher among those with longer treatment durations (31.3% for ≤ 2 years vs. 65.6% for > 20 years, p = 0.001). Notably, 63% of patients were unaware that their eye drops could contain preservatives. Regarding generics, 29.9% of patients had previously used one, while only 25.6% were willing to switch from their prescribed brand to a generic equivalent. Adherence was suboptimal, with only 66.2% of patients reporting being compliant. Younger age (p < 0.001) and lack of awareness about preservatives (p < 0.001) were significantly associated with non-adherence. When ranking treatment criteria, patients prioritized efficacy, followed by side effects, ease of use, cost, and environmental impact.

Conclusion: This nationwide survey conducted by the French Glaucoma Society underscores the diversity of patient preferences and the critical need for personalized glaucoma care. A substantial proportion of patients feels insufficiently informed about preservatives and generics, which may negatively impact adherence. Enhanced patient education and individualized treatment strategies are essential for improving outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Therapy
Advances in Therapy 医学-药学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
2.60%
发文量
353
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Therapy is an international, peer reviewed, rapid-publication (peer review in 2 weeks, published 3–4 weeks from acceptance) journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of therapeutics and interventions (including devices) across all therapeutic areas. Studies relating to diagnostics and diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged. The journal is of interest to a broad audience of healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, communications and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from all over the world. Advances in Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信