{"title":"手灵巧与功能障碍的剂量-反应关系:来自Kasama研究的纵向研究。","authors":"Namhoon Lim, Kenji Tsunoda, Jaehoon Seol, Yujiro Asano, Koki Nagata, Taishi Tsuji, Keisuke Fujii, Yuya Fujii, Kaori Teraoka, Tomohiro Okura","doi":"10.4235/agmr.25.0075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Poor hand dexterity may increase the risk of functional disability; however, few studies have examined the relationship between hand dexterity and incident functional disability. The aim of this study was to prospectively investigate the dose-response association of hand dexterity with incident functional disability in community-dwelling older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 1,069 older adults aged ≥65 years in Kasama City, Japan. Peg-moving and circle-drawing tasks were used to evaluate hand dexterity. Functional disability was identified using the Japanese Long-Term Care Insurance System database. Restricted cubic spline analysis was performed to investigate the dose-response association between hand dexterity and incident functional disability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During a mean follow-up of 8.5 years (maximum 14.0 years), 248 participants (23.2%) developed functional disability. The lowest performance group in each hand dexterity test had a significantly higher risk of functional disability than the highest performance group (peg-moving: HR = 1.92, 95% CI = 1.29-2.87; circle drawing: HR = 1.66, 95% CI = 1.15-2.41). Spline analysis confirmed curvilinear dose-response associations between hand dexterity and incident functional disability. Increased risk was observed when participants performed worse than the cut points (peg-moving: 37.9/38.0 seconds; circle drawing: 21/20 points), and no decreased risk was observed for those who performed better than these cut points.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Easily evaluated hand dexterity tests may be valuable for predicting functional disability in older adults. Curvilinear dose-response associations suggest that maintaining adequate hand dexterity could be a key strategy to support functional independence.</p>","PeriodicalId":44729,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dose-response Association between Hand Dexterity and Functional Disability: A Longitudinal Study from the Kasama Study.\",\"authors\":\"Namhoon Lim, Kenji Tsunoda, Jaehoon Seol, Yujiro Asano, Koki Nagata, Taishi Tsuji, Keisuke Fujii, Yuya Fujii, Kaori Teraoka, Tomohiro Okura\",\"doi\":\"10.4235/agmr.25.0075\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Poor hand dexterity may increase the risk of functional disability; however, few studies have examined the relationship between hand dexterity and incident functional disability. The aim of this study was to prospectively investigate the dose-response association of hand dexterity with incident functional disability in community-dwelling older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 1,069 older adults aged ≥65 years in Kasama City, Japan. Peg-moving and circle-drawing tasks were used to evaluate hand dexterity. Functional disability was identified using the Japanese Long-Term Care Insurance System database. Restricted cubic spline analysis was performed to investigate the dose-response association between hand dexterity and incident functional disability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During a mean follow-up of 8.5 years (maximum 14.0 years), 248 participants (23.2%) developed functional disability. The lowest performance group in each hand dexterity test had a significantly higher risk of functional disability than the highest performance group (peg-moving: HR = 1.92, 95% CI = 1.29-2.87; circle drawing: HR = 1.66, 95% CI = 1.15-2.41). Spline analysis confirmed curvilinear dose-response associations between hand dexterity and incident functional disability. Increased risk was observed when participants performed worse than the cut points (peg-moving: 37.9/38.0 seconds; circle drawing: 21/20 points), and no decreased risk was observed for those who performed better than these cut points.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Easily evaluated hand dexterity tests may be valuable for predicting functional disability in older adults. Curvilinear dose-response associations suggest that maintaining adequate hand dexterity could be a key strategy to support functional independence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44729,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4235/agmr.25.0075\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4235/agmr.25.0075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:手灵巧度差可能增加功能性残疾的风险;然而,很少有研究考察手灵巧性与偶发性功能障碍之间的关系。本研究的目的是前瞻性地调查社区居住的老年人手灵巧性与偶发性功能障碍的剂量-反应关系。方法:本研究纳入日本笠间市1069名年龄≥65岁的老年人。用移动钉子和画圆来评估手的灵巧性。使用日本长期护理保险系统数据库确定功能性残疾。采用限制性三次样条分析研究了手灵巧度与意外功能障碍之间的剂量-反应关系。结果:在平均8.5年(最长14.0年)的随访期间,248名参与者(23.2%)出现功能障碍。每项手灵巧性测试中表现最差的组出现功能障碍的风险明显高于表现最好的组(动钉:HR = 1.92, 95% CI = 1.29-2.87;画圆:HR = 1.66, 95% CI = 1.15-2.41)。样条分析证实了手灵巧度与偶发功能残疾之间的曲线剂量-反应关系。当参与者表现比切割点差时,观察到风险增加(移动挂钩:37.9/38.0秒;画圆圈:21/20分),而表现比这些切割点更好的人没有观察到风险降低。结论:易于评估的手灵活性测试可能对预测老年人功能障碍有价值。曲线剂量-反应关联表明,保持足够的手灵活性可能是支持功能独立性的关键策略。
Dose-response Association between Hand Dexterity and Functional Disability: A Longitudinal Study from the Kasama Study.
Background: Poor hand dexterity may increase the risk of functional disability; however, few studies have examined the relationship between hand dexterity and incident functional disability. The aim of this study was to prospectively investigate the dose-response association of hand dexterity with incident functional disability in community-dwelling older adults.
Methods: This study included 1,069 older adults aged ≥65 years in Kasama City, Japan. Peg-moving and circle-drawing tasks were used to evaluate hand dexterity. Functional disability was identified using the Japanese Long-Term Care Insurance System database. Restricted cubic spline analysis was performed to investigate the dose-response association between hand dexterity and incident functional disability.
Results: During a mean follow-up of 8.5 years (maximum 14.0 years), 248 participants (23.2%) developed functional disability. The lowest performance group in each hand dexterity test had a significantly higher risk of functional disability than the highest performance group (peg-moving: HR = 1.92, 95% CI = 1.29-2.87; circle drawing: HR = 1.66, 95% CI = 1.15-2.41). Spline analysis confirmed curvilinear dose-response associations between hand dexterity and incident functional disability. Increased risk was observed when participants performed worse than the cut points (peg-moving: 37.9/38.0 seconds; circle drawing: 21/20 points), and no decreased risk was observed for those who performed better than these cut points.
Conclusion: Easily evaluated hand dexterity tests may be valuable for predicting functional disability in older adults. Curvilinear dose-response associations suggest that maintaining adequate hand dexterity could be a key strategy to support functional independence.